US5440237A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Electronic force sensing with sensor normalization
Assignee: Intellectual Ventures I LLC
•
Filing: 1993-06-01
•
Granted: 1995-08-08
•
Expires: 2013-06-01
Abstract
Abstract Methods and apparatus are disclosed for normalizing electronic sensor data to correct for variations in individual sensor transfer characteristics which are not known in advance. A general characteristic transfer function for a sensor type of interest is determined empirically. A baseline response reading is acquired from an individual sensor, and that baseline response applied to the general transfer function to determine a specific transfer function for the individual sensor. The specific transfer function is used to calculate normalized data. One application of the invention is in computer cursor control pointing devices such as a joystick. Because the invention compensates for wide variations in sensor characteristics, inexpensive sensors such as force-sensitive resistors may be used in a joystick without sacrificing pointing accuracy and ergonomic efficiency.
Inventors
- 👤 Daniel R. Brown
- 👤 Philip D. Biehl
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-29 13:58
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01D; G01D18/00; G01D18/002; G01D18/006; G01L; G01L25/00
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 14
Claim 1
Independent Claim
146 words
A method of acquiring data from a individual electronic sensor of a specific type during external stimulus of the individual sensor to correct in-use for variations in sensitivity among sensors of the specific type, the method comprising: providing a general characteristic transfer function indicative of the sensors of a specific type: reading a baseline response of the specific sensor in an absence of external stimulus that is indicative of its transfer characteristics; while an external stimulus is applied to the sensor, reading an activated response value exhibited by the sensor; determining a specific transfer function for the individual sensor by applying the baseline response to the general characteristic transfer function; and applying the specific transfer function to the activated response value to determine an indication of the magnitude of the applied external stimulus, thereby correcting in-use for variations in sensitivity among sensors of the specific type.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
146 words
A method of acquiring data from a individual electronic sensor of a specific type during external stimulus of the individual sensor to correct in-use for variations in sensitivity among sensors of the specific type, the method comprising: providing a general characteristic transfer function indicative of the sensors of a specific type: reading a baseline response of the specific sensor in an absence of external stimulus that is indicative of its transfer characteristics; while an external stimulus is applied to the sensor, reading an activated response value exhibited by the sensor; determining a specific transfer function for the individual sensor by applying the baseline response to the general characteristic transfer function; and applying the specific transfer function to the activated response value to determine an indication of the magnitude of the applied external stimulus, thereby correcting in-use for variations in sensitivity among sensors of the specific type.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
93 words
A method according to claim 1 wherein: the specific type of sensor is an interleaved FSR; the general characteristic transfer function is a 1/X curve that asymptotically approaches a predetermined minimum resistance value; the baseline response is a preloaded resistance value; and the activated response is a resistance reading acquired while an external force is applied to the FSR; and said determining the specific transfer function and applying the specific transfer function includes computing a ratio of the baseline response less the minimum resistance, divided by the activated response less the minimum resistance.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
99 words
A method according to claim 1 wherein: the specific type of sensor is an arrayed transducer; the baseline response is a resistance reading acquired from the transducer at rest; the general characteristic transfer function is a linear force-to-resistance curve having a value proportional to the baseline response; the activated response is a resistance reading acquired while an external force is applied to the arrayed transducer; and said determining the specific transfer function and applying the specific transfer function includes computing a product of the activated response less the baseline response, and a scaling factor proportional to the baseline response.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
47 words
A method according to claim 1 wherein: the electronic sensor is a force sensor; determining a baseline response includes reading a response exhibited by the sensor when no external force is applied to the sensor; and the external stimulus is an external force applied to the sensor.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
43 words
A method according to claim 4 further comprising: providing a predetermined nominal minimum response value for the sensor; and wherein the specific transfer function of the sensor is determined based on the nominal minimum response value and the baseline response of the sensor.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
89 words
A method according to claim 5 wherein: the force sensor is an FSR type of sensor having a general characteristic transfer function that is a generally inverse function of applied force; the baseline response is a resistance reading taken while the sensor is preloaded and in the absence of an external force; and said computing step includes determining a quantity proportional to the external force applied to the sensor as a ratio of the baseline response less the minimum response, divided by the measured response less the minimum response.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
40 words
A method according to claim 5 wherein the computing step includes normalizing the sensitivity of the sensor responsive to the baseline reading so that a predetermined change of one force "count" approximately corresponds to a predetermined change in applied force.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
37 words
A method according to claim 5 wherein reading the FSR includes: converting the activated FSR resistance to an analog voltage; and converting the analog voltage to a digital count for computing an indication of the applied force.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
43 words
A method according to claim 5 wherein determining a baseline resistance includes: determining whether or not an external force is applied to the FSR; and while no external force is applied to the FSR, reading the FSR to acquire the baseline resistance reading.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
56 words
A method according to claim 5 wherein providing the minimum response value includes measuring response values of each of a statistically significant number of sensors under an applied force adequate to drive each sensor to exhibit approximately its minimum response value, and then combining the measured minimum response values to form the nominal minimum response value.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
20 words
A method according to claim 10 wherein said combining step includes computing an average of the measured minimum response values.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
26 words
A method according to claim 10 wherein said combining step includes selecting a smallest of the measured minimum response values as the nominal minimum response value.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
57 words
A method according to claim 10 wherein the sensor transfer characteristic is a generally inverse relationship between applied force and response; and said computing the quantity proportional to the external force applied to the sensor is determined by a ratio of the baseline response less the minimum response, divided by the measured response less the minimum response.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4374381A
Cited
US4399515A
Cited
US4446715B1
Cited
US4446715A
Cited
US4716536A
Cited
US4725950A
Cited
DE3523701A1
Cited
EP0302385A2
Cited
WO1989003019A1
Cited
WO1989006023A1
Cited
US5012231A
Cited
DE3913648C1
Cited
US5247467A
Cited
US5135002A
Cited
US5269311A
Cited
US5345400A
Cited
US5095453A
Cited
EP0535907A2
Cited
US5347476A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1998-08-07 | 1999-02-06 | 1999-08-08 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2002-08-07 | 2003-02-06 | 2003-08-08 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2006-08-07 | 2007-02-06 | 2007-08-08 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |