US5426972A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Monitoring soil compaction
Assignee: Gas Technology Institute
•
Filing: 1993-04-20
•
Granted: 1995-06-27
•
Expires: 2013-04-20
Abstract
Abstract Methods and apparatus for determining whether soil is satisfactorily compacted. An operator delivers impact energy to the soil, and the amount of impact energy transmitted through the soil is repeatedly sensed and stored. A modelling formula, which approximates the variation of the stored amounts of impact energy, is used to generate current and target values for the level of compaction; if the current value equals or exceeds the target value, the soil is considered to be satisfactorily compacted.
Inventors
- 👤 Frank J. Heirtzler
- 👤 Robert L. Cardenas
- 👤 David M. George
- 👤 Kenneth A. Pasch
- 👤 Daniel R. Deguire
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-03 11:38
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01N; G01N3/00; G01N3/30; G01N33/00; G01N33/24
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 15
Claim 1
Independent Claim
179 words
A method for determining whether a compactable material is satisfactorily compacted, comprising: delivering compaction energy pulses to said compactable material, sensing the amount of compaction energy transmitted through said compactable material in response to energy pulses, storing data indicative of the amount of transmitted compaction energy sensed in said sensing step, repeating said delivering, sensing, and storing one or more times to sense and store a progression of data indicative of transmitted compaction energy, generating signals representative of a current level of compaction of said compactable material and a target level of compaction of said compactable material from said progression of data indicative of transmitted compaction energy, said generating signals step including the steps of producing a modelling formula which approximates said progression of data indicative of transmitted compaction energy, and generating a signal representative of said current level and said target level from said produced modelling formula, comparing said current level of compaction to said target level of compaction, and if said current level equals or exceeds said target level, determining that said compactable material is satisfactorily compacted.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
179 words
A method for determining whether a compactable material is satisfactorily compacted, comprising: delivering compaction energy pulses to said compactable material, sensing the amount of compaction energy transmitted through said compactable material in response to energy pulses, storing data indicative of the amount of transmitted compaction energy sensed in said sensing step, repeating said delivering, sensing, and storing one or more times to sense and store a progression of data indicative of transmitted compaction energy, generating signals representative of a current level of compaction of said compactable material and a target level of compaction of said compactable material from said progression of data indicative of transmitted compaction energy, said generating signals step including the steps of producing a modelling formula which approximates said progression of data indicative of transmitted compaction energy, and generating a signal representative of said current level and said target level from said produced modelling formula, comparing said current level of compaction to said target level of compaction, and if said current level equals or exceeds said target level, determining that said compactable material is satisfactorily compacted.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
11 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said compactable material is soil.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising after determining that said compactable material is satisfactorily compacted, signalling satisfactory compaction to an operator.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said modelling formula approaches a fixed asymptotic value, and said target level of compaction is a fraction of said asymptotic value.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
48 words
The method of claim 4 wherein said modelling formula is ##EQU8## where t is the number of the repetition of said sensing step during which transmitted compaction energy is sensed, and b and m are parameters which are adjusted to approximate said formula to said progression of data.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method of claim 1 wherein sensing the amount of compaction energy comprises repeatedly sensing the peak amplitude of an electrical signal generated by a sensor over successive sampling periods, and retaining only those peak amplitudes larger than a predetermined threshold.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method of claim 4 wherein sensing the amount of compaction energy comprises repeatedly sensing the peak amplitude of an electrical signal generated by a sensor over successive sampling periods, and retaining only those peak amplitudes larger than a predetermined threshold.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 7 wherein sensing the amount of compaction energy further comprises forming a low-pass filtered version of said retained peak amplitudes.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 8 wherein forming a low-pass filtered version of a peak amplitude comprises averaging said peak amplitude with other peak amplitudes sensed during prior repetitions of said sensing step.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 8 wherein sensing the amount of compaction energy further comprises forming a logarithmic transformation of said low-pass filtered version of said retained peak amplitudes.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 10 wherein sensing the amount of compaction energy further comprises applying a linear regression to said logarithmic transformation of said low-pass filtered version of said retained peak amplitudes.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 11 wherein applying said linear regression includes applying a weighting formula to said logarithmic transformation of said low-pass filtered version of said retained peak amplitudes.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
11 words
The method of claim 12 wherein said compactable material is soil.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 13 further comprising after determining that said compactable material is satisfactorily compacted, signalling satisfactory compaction to an operator.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3456596A
Cited
US3641181A
Cited
US4149253A
Cited
US3998090A
Cited
USRE31195E
Cited
US4348901A
Cited
US4467652A
Cited
SU973702A1
Cited
US4495434A
Cited
SU1318653A1
Cited
JPS62134557A
Cited
SU1388799A1
Cited
WO1991014182A1
Cited
US5105650A
Cited
US5177415A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1998-06-26 | 1998-12-26 | 1999-06-27 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2002-06-26 | 2002-12-26 | 2003-06-27 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2006-06-26 | 2006-12-26 | 2007-06-27 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |