US5424945A — System for evaluating a psychological effect of a…

Claim 1

Independent Claim 204 words

An automated method of evaluating a psychological effect of an image embodied in image data, comprising the steps of: accepting image data in the form of digital data, each digital datum corresponding to at least one pixel in the image; polling the image data and identifying at least one subset of the image data by a visually-perceptible characteristic thereof; deriving from the identified image data a point-score relating to an extent of image data associated with the visually-perceptible characteristic in all the image data; providing a plurality of selectable algorithms, each algorithm relating the visually-perceptible characteristic to a predetermined psychological effect; displaying a set of objective questions and prompting for answers thereto, the set of objective questions being organized into a plurality of subsets, each unique subset of questions relating to a specific algorithm; receiving a combination of answers relating to a subset of objective questions; selecting an algorithm based on the subset of questions receiving a predetermined answer; applying the point-score to the selected algorithm relating the visually-perceptible characteristic to a predetermined psychological effect, yielding a value indicative of the presence of the psychological effect in the image; and displaying a report indicative of the presence of the psychological effect in the image.

Claim 2

Dependent Claim 204 words

An automated method of evaluating a psychological effect of an image embodied in image data, comprising the steps of: accepting image data in the form of digital data, each digital datum corresponding to at least one pixel in the image; polling the image data and identifying at least one subset of the image data by a visually-perceptible characteristic thereof; deriving from the identified image data a point-score relating to an extent of image data associated with the visually-perceptible characteristic in all the image data; providing a plurality of selectable algorithms, each algorithm relating the visually-perceptible characteristic to a predetermined psychological effect; displaying a set of objective questions and prompting for answers thereto, the set of objective questions being organized into a plurality of subsets, each unique subset of questions relating to a specific algorithm; receiving a combination of answers relating to a subset of objective questions; selecting an algorithm based on the subset of questions receiving a predetermined answer; applying the point-score to the selected algorithm relating the visually-perceptible characteristic to a predetermined psychological effect, yielding a value indicative of the presence of the psychological effect in the image; and displaying a report indicative of the presence of the psychological effect in the image.

Claim 3

Dependent Claim 23 words

A method as in claim 1, wherein said identifying step identifies an identity of a font associated with the subset of image data.

Claim 4

Dependent Claim 21 words

A method as in claim 1, wherein said identifying step identifies a character size associated with the subset of image data.

Claim 5

Dependent Claim 23 words

A method as in claim 1, wherein said identifying step identifies a presence of a color associated with the subset of image data.

Claim 6

Dependent Claim 42 words

A method as in claim 1, further comprising the step of calculating the proportion of the image surface related to a subset of the image data, based on the font, character size, and number of characters of the font and character size.

Claim 7

Dependent Claim 22 words

A method as in claim 1, further comprising the step of determining the optical weight associated with a subset of image data.

Claim 8

Dependent Claim 32 words

A method as in claim 1, wherein the deriving step includes a step of comparing a visually-perceptible characteristic of two subsets of image data and deriving a point-score based on the comparison.

Claim 9

Dependent Claim 33 words

A method as in claim 1, wherein the deriving step includes a step of comparing the relative optical densities of two subsets of image data, and deriving a point-score based on the comparison.

Claim 10

Dependent Claim 33 words

A method as in claim 1, wherein the deriving step includes a step of comparing relative surface areas associated with two subsets of image data, and deriving a point-score based on the comparison.

Claim 11

Dependent Claim 53 words

A method as in claim 1, wherein the deriving step includes a step of comparing a proportion of a subset of image data associated with a subregion of the entire image with a proportion of the subset of image data not associated with the subregion, and deriving a point-score based on the comparison.

Claim 12

Dependent Claim 22 words

A method as in claim 1, wherein the deriving step includes a step of determining the number of colors in the image.

Claim 13

Dependent Claim 25 words

A method as in claim 1, wherein the deriving step includes a step of determining the identity of a combination of colors in the image.

Claim 14

Dependent Claim 28 words

A method as in claim 1, wherein the applying step accepts as an input an inherent psychological effect of a font associated with the subset of image data.

Claim 15

Dependent Claim 27 words

A method as in claim 1, wherein the applying step accepts as an input therein an inherent psychological effect of a combination of colors in the image.

Claim 16

Dependent Claim 29 words

A method as in claim 1, wherein the applying step accepts as an input therein an extent of symmetry through a predetermined axis of image data within the image.

Claim 17

Dependent Claim 36 words

A method as in claim 1, further comprising the steps of: selecting a plurality of algorithm; applying the point-score to at least one algorithm to obtain relative values of psychological effects associated with the selected algorithms.

Claim 18

Dependent Claim 89 words

A method as in claim 1, wherein the image comprises a plurality of aspects, and further comprising the steps of: determining the proportion of each aspect identified with each of a plurality of types of image data; comparing the proportions of each aspect identified with each of a plurality of types of image data among a plurality of aspects; and deriving a point-score related to the consistency of the proportions of each aspect identified with each of a plurality of types of image data among a plurality of aspects.

Claim 19

Dependent Claim 64 words

A method as in claim 1, further comprising the steps of: identifying a subset of the image data with a predetermined subregion within the image; determining the proportion of area within the subregion identified with at least one type of image data; and deriving a point-score related to the proportion of area within the subregion identified with at least one type of image data.

Claim 20

Dependent Claim 87 words

A method as in claim 18, further comprising the steps of: comparing the proportion of area within the subregion identified with at least one type of image data to the proportion of area outside the subregion identified with the at least one type of image data; and deriving a point-score related to the relative proportion of area within the subregion identified with at least one type of image data to the proportion of area outside the subregion identified with the at least one type of image data.

Annuity Stage	Window Opens	Payment Deadline	Surcharge Period Until	Estimated Fee	Status
3.5 Years (Year 4)	1998-06-12	1998-12-12	1999-06-13	$2000.00	Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8)	2002-06-12	2002-12-12	2003-06-13	$3760.00	Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12)	2006-06-12	2006-12-12	2007-06-13	$7700.00	Window Closed / Lapsed

System for evaluating a psychological effect of a document

Abstract

Inventors

Bibliographic Details

Claims Analysis

References Cited (Backward Citations)

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Assigned Categories & Tags

Assign Category Tag