US5410388A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Automatic compensation for toner concentration drift due to developer aging
Assignee: Xerox Corp
•
Filing: 1993-05-17
•
Granted: 1995-04-25
•
Expires: 2013-05-17
Abstract
Abstract A method of maintaining consistent large solid area development by developing a large area test patch covering the image area of a photorececptor and detecting the lead edge and trail edge density of the test patch using a densitometer to measure reflectance. If a density differential between lead and trail edge density is detected, electrostatic parameters such as toner concentration, developer bias, and photoreceptor potential are adjusted to maintain constant large solid area development.
Inventors
- 👤 James M. Pacer
- 👤 Brendan C. Casey
- 👤 George F. Bergen
- 👤 Patricia J. Weber
- 👤 William M. OuYang
- 👤 Vilmarie Lopez-Heroux
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 18:55
CPC Classifications
G; G03; G03G; G03G15/00; G03G15/50; G03G15/5033; G03G15/5041; G03G2215/00; G03G2215/00025; G03G2215/00029; G03G2215/00033; G03G2215/00037; G03G2215/00042
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
161 words
In a machine having an imaging surface, a projecting system for projecting an image onto the imaging surface, a developer for application of toner to the image projected onto the imaging surface for transfer of the image to a copy sheet, the developer responding to given set points including developer bias and imaging surface potentials, the method of automatic adjustment of the developer comprising the steps of; routinely sensing toner mass on a first developed patch within an interimage space on the imaging surface, adjusting the developer bias and imaging surface potentials in response to the routine sensing of the toner mass, upon predetermined machine operation, sensing toner mass on a second developed patch covering at least a portion of an image space on the imaging surface, and responding to said machine operation sensing to calibrate the set points of the developer for routinely sensing the toner mass on the first developed patch within the interimage space on the imaging surface.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
161 words
In a machine having an imaging surface, a projecting system for projecting an image onto the imaging surface, a developer for application of toner to the image projected onto the imaging surface for transfer of the image to a copy sheet, the developer responding to given set points including developer bias and imaging surface potentials, the method of automatic adjustment of the developer comprising the steps of; routinely sensing toner mass on a first developed patch within an interimage space on the imaging surface, adjusting the developer bias and imaging surface potentials in response to the routine sensing of the toner mass, upon predetermined machine operation, sensing toner mass on a second developed patch covering at least a portion of an image space on the imaging surface, and responding to said machine operation sensing to calibrate the set points of the developer for routinely sensing the toner mass on the first developed patch within the interimage space on the imaging surface.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the second developed patch covering at least a portion of the image space on the imaging surface covers the entire image space on the imaging surface.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
55 words
The method of claim 1 wherein sensing the toner mass on a second developed patch includes the steps of sensing a first edge of the second developed patch, sensing a second edge of the second developed patch, comparing the sensing of the first and second edges and calibrating the set points depending upon the comparison.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
99 words
In a machine having an imaging surface, a projecting system for projecting an image onto the imaging surface, a developer controlled by given set points for application of toner to the image projected onto the imaging surface, the method of automatic adjustment of the developer set points comprising the steps of developing a test patch on the imaging surface, determining a difference in toner concentration at two locations on the test patch developed on the imaging surface, comparing a field potential at the developer to a reference potential, and selectively adjusting the set points in response to said comparing.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
99 words
In a machine having an imaging surface, a projecting system for projecting an image onto the imaging surface, a developer controlled by given set points for application of toner to the image projected onto the imaging surface, the method of automatic adjustment of the developer set points comprising the steps of developing a test patch on the imaging surface, determining a difference in toner concentration at two locations on the test patch developed on the imaging surface, comparing a field potential at the developer to a reference potential, and selectively adjusting the set points in response to said comparing.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 4 wherein said field potential is the difference between a developer bias voltage and a background voltage on the imaging surface.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
46 words
The method of claim 4 wherein the step of selectively adjusting the set points in response to said comparing includes the step of proportionately decreasing a bias voltage and an image voltage on the imaging surface if the field potential is greater than the reference potential.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
37 words
The method of claim 4 wherein the step of selectively adjusting the set points in response to said comparing includes the step of increasing a bias voltage if the field potential is less than the reference potential.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
40 words
The method of claim 4 wherein the step of selectively adjusting the set points in response to said comparing includes the step of decreasing an image potential if the field potential is within a given range of the reference potential.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4519695A
Cited
US4999673A
Cited
US4980723A
Cited
US5023668A
Cited
US5253018A
Cited
US5122835A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1998-04-24 | 1998-10-24 | 1999-04-25 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2002-04-24 | 2002-10-24 | 2003-04-25 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2006-04-24 | 2006-10-24 | 2007-04-25 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |