US5410252A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Magnetic survey technique for determining subsurface environmental contamination
Assignee: Individual
•
Filing: 1992-05-27
•
Granted: 1995-04-25
•
Expires: 2012-05-27
Abstract
Abstract A technique for determining the extent of underground contamination within a test area involves recording of magnetic measurements at each of a plurality of test sites to generate magnetic test data. The generated magnetic test data is grouped within one of a plurality of selected data ranges, and the grouped data is displayed as a function of the test area. The displayed test data may be compared with base data related to underground contamination to determine the extent of contamination within the test area. Generated data is grouped within the plurality of data ranges each having variation of less than 25 gammas, and multiple groupings of data may be displayed with similarly colored data within one of a plurality of levels. The displayed test data may be compared with the contamination level from one or more contamination locations within the test area, and contamination locations overlayed on a map of the test area with the grouped magnetic test data.
Inventors
- 👤 Michael Potter
- 👤 Ron Sabala
- 👤 Mustafa Saribudak
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-08 14:54
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01V; G01V3/00; G01V3/08; G01V3/087
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 22
Claim 1
Independent Claim
112 words
A method of determining the extent of underground contamination within a test area, the method comprising: generating base data related to underground; selecting a plurality of test sites spaced throughout a ground surface of the test area; recording a magnetic measurement at each of the plurality of test sites to generate magnetic test data; grouping the magnetic test data within one of a plurality of selected data ranges each having a variation of less than about 25 gammas; displaying the grouped magnetic test data as a function of the test area; and comparing the displayed test data with the base data to determine the extent of underground contamination within the test area.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
112 words
A method of determining the extent of underground contamination within a test area, the method comprising: generating base data related to underground; selecting a plurality of test sites spaced throughout a ground surface of the test area; recording a magnetic measurement at each of the plurality of test sites to generate magnetic test data; grouping the magnetic test data within one of a plurality of selected data ranges each having a variation of less than about 25 gammas; displaying the grouped magnetic test data as a function of the test area; and comparing the displayed test data with the base data to determine the extent of underground contamination within the test area.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method as defined in claim 1, wherein the step of selecting a plurality of test sites comprises: selecting test sites defining a uniform grid-shape pattern over at least a portion of the test area.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method as defined in claim 1, further comprising: correcting the magnetic test data as a function of one or more non-contaminating sources.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
85 words
The method as defined in claim 3, wherein the step of correcting magnetic test data comprises: recording magnetic measurements in the vicinity of each of the one or more non-contaminating magnetic sources; determining the spacing between each of the one or more non-contaminating sources and one or more of the plurality of test sites; and calculating a magnetic correction factor attributable to the one or more non-magnetic sources and functionally related to the spacing between the one or more of the plurality of test sites.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method as defined in claim 1, further comprising: determining the depth of underground contamination at one or more of the plurality of test sites as a function of the change in the magnetic test data from adjacent ones of the plurality of test sites.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method as defined in claim 1, wherein the step of generating base data related to underground contamination action comprises: determining a contamination condition at one or more locations within the test area.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method as defined in claim 6, wherein the step of comparing the displayed test data with the base data comprises: overlaying the displayed test data and the one or more locations within the test area.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method as defined in claim 1, wherein the step of generating the base data related to underground contamination comprises: determining magnetic test data from known contaminated materials.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
43 words
The method as defined in claim 1, wherein the step of recording a magnetic measurement comprises: positioning a magnetometer over each of the plurality of test sites; and entering the magnetic measurement as a function of the test site into a portable computer.
Claim 11
Independent Claim
123 words
A method of determining the extent of underground contamination within a test area including one or more contamination locations each having a contamination level, the method comprising: selecting a plurality of test sites spaced throughout a ground surface of the test area; recording a magnetic measurement at each of the plurality of test sites to generate magnetic test data; grouping the magnetic test data within one of a plurality of selected data ranges each having a variation of less than about 25 gammas; displaying the grouped test data as a function of the test area; and comparing the displayed test data with the contamination level from the one or more contamination locations to determine the extent of underground contamination within the test area.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
123 words
A method of determining the extent of underground contamination within a test area including one or more contamination locations each having a contamination level, the method comprising: selecting a plurality of test sites spaced throughout a ground surface of the test area; recording a magnetic measurement at each of the plurality of test sites to generate magnetic test data; grouping the magnetic test data within one of a plurality of selected data ranges each having a variation of less than about 25 gammas; displaying the grouped test data as a function of the test area; and comparing the displayed test data with the contamination level from the one or more contamination locations to determine the extent of underground contamination within the test area.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method as defined in claim 10, further comprising: correcting the magnetic test data as a function of one or more non-contaminating sources.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method as defined in claim 10, further comprising: monitoring the contamination level within one or more test wells within the test area.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method as defined in claim 12, wherein the step of comparing the displayed test data with the contamination level from the one or more contamination locations comprises: overlaying the displayed test data and the contamination locations within the test area.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method as defined in claim 10, further comprising: comparing the displayed test data with magnetic test data generated from other test areas.
Claim 17
Independent Claim
116 words
A method of determining the extent of underground contamination within a test area, the method comprising: generating base data relating to migration of underground fluids; selecting a plurality of test sites defining a grid-shaped pattern spaced throughout a ground surface of the test area; positioning a magnetometer over each of the plurality of test sites to generate magnetic test data; grouping the magnetic test data within one of a plurality of selected data ranges each having a variation of less than 25 gammas; displaying the grouped test data as a function of the test area; and comparing the displayed test data with the base data to determine the extent of underground contamination within the test area.
Claim 18
Independent Claim
116 words
A method of determining the extent of underground contamination within a test area, the method comprising: generating base data relating to migration of underground fluids; selecting a plurality of test sites defining a grid-shaped pattern spaced throughout a ground surface of the test area; positioning a magnetometer over each of the plurality of test sites to generate magnetic test data; grouping the magnetic test data within one of a plurality of selected data ranges each having a variation of less than 25 gammas; displaying the grouped test data as a function of the test area; and comparing the displayed test data with the base data to determine the extent of underground contamination within the test area.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method as defined in claim 15, further comprising: comparing the displayed test data with a contamination level from one or more locations within the test area; and overlaying the displayed data and the locations within the test area.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
65 words
The method as defined in claim 15, wherein the step of grouping magnetic test data comprises: grouping the magnetic test data within one of a plurality of magnetometer levels each having a range of more than 25 gammas; and grouping magnetic test data within each of the plurality of magnetometer levels within the selected data ranges each having a variation of less than 25 gammas.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method as defined in claim 17, further comprising: displaying the grouped magnetometer levels as a function of the test area.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method as defined in claim 15, further comprising: determining magnetic test data from known contaminated materials.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2770305A
Cited
US4939460A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1998-04-24 | 1998-10-24 | 1999-04-25 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2002-04-24 | 2002-10-24 | 2003-04-25 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2006-04-24 | 2006-10-24 | 2007-04-25 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |