← Back to Patent Explorer
US5406612A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Method of and apparatus for standardizing and monitoring image quality in mammography

Assignee: Thomas Jefferson University
•
Filing: 1993-08-04
•
Granted: 1995-04-11
•
Expires: 2013-08-04
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract Methods and apparatus for correcting the effect on image quality of a film processor which develops a radiographic image of a structure of interest on a film having an emulsion is disclosed. Such methods and apparatus include shielding a first portion of the film along one edge from the x-ray energy used for imaging the structure of interest and impressing a first calibrated test pattern on the first portion of the film. The first pattern includes a first calibrated graded stepwise density pattern having density positions. The density pattern is produced by visible light. A first plurality of symbols is located adjacent the first pattern, wherein each symbol indicates the magnitude of one of the density positions. A control film of similar emulsion as the emulsion of the image film is provided and impressed with a second calibrated test pattern along one edge. The second pattern includes a second calibrated graded stepwise density pattern having density positions, which pattern was also produced by visible light. A second plurality of symbols is located adjacent the second pattern, wherein each symbol indicates the magnitude of one of the density positions. The intensity and spectrum of the visible light used for impressing the first and second patterns is adjustable. The film is processed in a film processor to develop the first pattern and the radiographic image of the structure of interest. The control film is processed to develop the second pattern. The performance of the film processor used to develop the film is measured by comparing and noting the symbols associated with those density positions between the first and second patterns which match. Physical parameters of selected portions of the developed image of the structure of interest are measured, such parameters define image quality. These parameters are corrected for the effect of film processor performance by adjusting the values of the measured physical parameters according to the optical density values at the match positions of the first and second patterns.

Inventors

  • 👤 Benjamin M. Galkin

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-08 02:21
CPC Classifications
G; G03; G03D; G03D13/00; G03D13/007; G03B; G03B42/00; G03B42/02; G03B42/04; G03B42/047; H; H05; H05G; H05G1/00; H05G1/08; H05G1/26; A; A61; A61B; A61B6/00; A61B6/58; A61B6/582; A61B6/583

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 20
Claim 1
Independent Claim 199 words
A system for evaluating the performance of a radiographic imaging film processor, said system comprising: a cassette: a radiographic imaging film of a first emulsion disposed within said cassette, said film comprising a first exposable area for imaging a structure of interest using x-rays and a second exposable area for imaging a first calibrated graded density pattern impressed by light, said second area being shielded from the effects of x-rays during imaging of the structure of interest and a first plurality of symbols, located adjacent said first calibrated graded density pattern, wherein each symbol indicates the magnitude of one of said density positions; and a control film of a second emulsion, wherein said first and second emulsions are identical, said control film having a light induced second calibrated control density pattern and a second plurality of symbols, located adjacent said second calibrated graded density pattern, wherein each symbol indicates the magnitude of one of said density positions, wherein said control film and said imaging film are developed in the same film processor, wherein the performance of the film processor which develops the radiographic image on the film is measured by comparing said first and second calibrated graded density patterns.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 199 words
A system for evaluating the performance of a radiographic imaging film processor, said system comprising: a cassette: a radiographic imaging film of a first emulsion disposed within said cassette, said film comprising a first exposable area for imaging a structure of interest using x-rays and a second exposable area for imaging a first calibrated graded density pattern impressed by light, said second area being shielded from the effects of x-rays during imaging of the structure of interest and a first plurality of symbols, located adjacent said first calibrated graded density pattern, wherein each symbol indicates the magnitude of one of said density positions; and a control film of a second emulsion, wherein said first and second emulsions are identical, said control film having a light induced second calibrated control density pattern and a second plurality of symbols, located adjacent said second calibrated graded density pattern, wherein each symbol indicates the magnitude of one of said density positions, wherein said control film and said imaging film are developed in the same film processor, wherein the performance of the film processor which develops the radiographic image on the film is measured by comparing said first and second calibrated graded density patterns.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 20 words
The system recited in claim 1 wherein the graded density pattern is created from modulated light of known spectral characteristics.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 42 words
The system recited in claim 1 wherein the graded density pattern is impressed on the second exposable area of the film after exposure of the emulsion to x-rays to impress the image of the object of interest on the first exposable area.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 42 words
The system recited in claim 1 wherein the graded density pattern is impressed on the second exposable area of the film before exposure of the emulsion to x-rays to impress the image of the object of interest on the first exposable area.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 18 words
The system recited in claim 1 wherein the control density pattern is photographically imaged on a control film.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 20 words
The system recited in claim 5 wherein the control density pattern is precalibrated in terms of a plurality of parameters.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 16 words
The system recited in claim 6 wherein the plurality of parameters is determined by densitometric analysis.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 51 words
The system recited in claim 1 wherein the imaging film further comprises a first identifying means for identifying film type and wherein the control film further comprises second identifying means for identifying film type wherein it can be determined that the film and the control film are of a same type.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 117 words
The system recited in claim 1 wherein said cassette comprises: a housing, having a front tube side and a back side, said housing being adapted to contain said imaging film, said imaging film being a single emulsion film, and a single intensifying screen, said screen facing and pressed against said emulsion surface of said film, for irradiating the exposable area of the emulsion with fluorescent energy induced by x-ray energy, thereby impressing an image of the structure of interest on the first exposable area; first means for blocking x-ray energy from reaching said second exposable area of the film, and second means for maintaining the film in contact with said intensifying screen when said cassette is closed.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 46 words
The system recited in claim 9 wherein said cassette contains first means for blocking x-ray energy from reaching said second area of the film wherein said first means for blocking x-ray energy, blocks x-ray energy from reaching a portion of one edge of said intensifying screen.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 42 words
The system recited in claim 9 wherein said intensifying screen and said film are rectangularly shaped and wherein said second area of the film is located along a long edge of said film, said edge being furthest from the structure of interest.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 16 words
The system recited in claim 9 wherein said intensifying screen is substantially co-extensive with said film.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 35 words
The system recited in claim 9 wherein the area of said intensifying screen is smaller that said film so as to prevent production of fluorescent radiation that could reach said second area of the film.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 40 words
The system recited in claim 9 wherein the intensifying screen is adapted with an opaque strip located along a long edge of said screen to block fluorescent energy, induced by x-ray energy, from reaching said second area of the film.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 31 words
The system recited in claim 9 wherein the intensifying screen is adapted to allow the calibrated graded density pattern to be impressed by light on the second area of the film.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 53 words
The system recited in claim 1 wherein said cassette containing said imaging film is shielded from x-rays along one edge during exposure of the object of interest to x-rays, said shielding being external to the cassette, said shielding being co-extensive with said second area of emulsion for imaging said calibrated graded density pattern.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 21 words
The system recited in claim 1 wherein said second area of said film further comprises an area for impressing identifying information.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 18 words
The system recited in claim 1 wherein said control film further comprises an area for impressing identifying information.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 34 words
The system of claim 1, further comprising a platform for holding said cassette, said platform comprising shielding for shielding said second area from the effects of x-rays during imaging of the structure of interest.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US5063583A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1998-04-10 1998-10-10 1999-04-11 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2002-04-10 2002-10-10 2003-04-11 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2006-04-10 2006-10-10 2007-04-11 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag