US5406209A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Methods and apparatus for testing circuit boards
Assignee: RPX Clearinghouse LLC
•
Filing: 1993-02-04
•
Granted: 1995-04-11
•
Expires: 2013-02-04
Abstract
Abstract In methods and apparatus for non-contact testing of an electronic circuit board at least one electromagnetic emission sensing probe is disposed a short distance from a circuit board under test, the circuit board is operated while sensing electromagnetic emission from a region of the circuit board near the probe, and a time domain representation of the sensed electromagnetic emission is developed. The time domain representation of the sensed electromagnetic emission is compared to a time domain representation of electromagnetic emission of a circuit board known to be operating properly. Preferably, an array of electric field sensing probes is used to sense emissions from several regions of the circuit board simultaneously, and time domain representations of the sensed electromagnetic emissions are simultaneously developed and compared to respective time domain representations of electromagnetic emissions from circuit boards known to be operating properly.
Inventors
- 👤 Nigel P. Johnson
- 👤 Dan Leonida
- 👤 Richard R. Goulette
- 👤 Stanislus K. Xavier
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-31 20:16
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01R; G01R31/00; G01R31/28; G01R31/302; G01R31/308; G01R31/311
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 49
Claim 1
Independent Claim
126 words
A method for non-contact testing of electronic circuit boards, the method comprising: disposing at least one electromagnetic emission sensing probe a short distance from a circuit board under test; applying time dependent test signals to operate the circuit board while sensing electromagnetic emission from a region of the circuit board near the probe; developing a time domain representation of the sensed electromagnetic emission, the time domain representation comprising a signal representing evolution of the sensed electromagnetic emission from said region of said circuit board over a finite period of time; and comparing the time domain representation of the sensed electromagnetic emission to a time domain representation of electromagnetic emission from a corresponding region of a similar circuit board subject to the same time dependent test signals.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
126 words
A method for non-contact testing of electronic circuit boards, the method comprising: disposing at least one electromagnetic emission sensing probe a short distance from a circuit board under test; applying time dependent test signals to operate the circuit board while sensing electromagnetic emission from a region of the circuit board near the probe; developing a time domain representation of the sensed electromagnetic emission, the time domain representation comprising a signal representing evolution of the sensed electromagnetic emission from said region of said circuit board over a finite period of time; and comparing the time domain representation of the sensed electromagnetic emission to a time domain representation of electromagnetic emission from a corresponding region of a similar circuit board subject to the same time dependent test signals.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
36 words
A method as defined in claim 1, comprising disposing a plurality of electromagnetic emission sensing probes a short distance from the circuit board to sense electromagnetic emission from a plurality of regions of the circuit board.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
60 words
A method as defined in claim 2, comprising: simultaneously sensing electromagnetic emission with each of the probes; simultaneously developing a time domain representation of the electromagnetic emission sensed by each probe; and simultaneously comparing the time domain representations of the sensed electromagnetic emission to respective time domain representations of electromagnetic emission of a circuit board known to be operating properly.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
88 words
A method as defined in claim 1, comprising: successively disposing the probe in different locations, each location being a short distance from a corresponding region of the circuit board; and repeating application of the time dependent test signals to operate the circuit board while successively sensing electromagnetic emission at each location of the probe; successively developing time domain representations of the sensed electromagnetic emission; and successively comparing the time domain representations of the sensed electromagnetic emission to time domain representations of electromagnetic emission of a similar circuit board.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
119 words
A method as defined in claim 2, comprising: successively disposing the plurality of probes in different locations, each location being a short distance from a corresponding region of the circuit board; repeating application of the time dependent test signals to operate the circuit board while simultaneously sensing electromagnetic emission with each probe at each successive location of the plurality of probes; simultaneously developing time domain representations of the electromagnetic emission sensed by each probe at each successive location of the plurality of probes; and simultaneously comparing the time domain representations of the electromagnetic emission sensed by each probe to time domain representations of electromagnetic emission of a similar circuit board at each successive location of the plurality of probes.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
37 words
A method as defined in claim 1, wherein the test signals comprise timing signals for synchronizing operation of the circuit board to operation of apparatus used to develop the time domain representations of the sensed electromagnetic emission.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
28 words
A method as defined in claim 6, where the test signals comprise signals in addition to timing signals, the additional signals exercising predetermined elements of the circuit board.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
21 words
A method as defined in claim 7, wherein the additional signals exercise built in self test elements of the circuit board.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
23 words
A method as defined in claim 1, comprising sensing an electric field of the electromagnetic emission of the circuit board with the probe.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
22 words
A method as defined in claim 1, wherein the step of developing a time domain representation comprises amplifying the sensed electromagnetic emission.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
25 words
A method as defined in claim 1, wherein the step of developing a time domain representation comprises sampling and digitally encoding the sensed electromagnetic emission.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
17 words
A method as defined in claim 11, comprising digitally encoding the sensed electromagnetic emission by successive approximation.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
20 words
A method as defined in claim 12, comprising digitally encoding a single bit per sample of the sensed electromagnetic emission.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
60 words
A method as defined in claim 6, comprising: periodically restarting operation of the circuit board at successive restart times; and sampling electromagnetic emission from the circuit board at a predetermined number of sampling times between successive restart times, the sampling times having sampling delays with respect to the restart times, the sampling delays being varied according to a sampling algorithm.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
15 words
A method as defined in claim 14, comprising incrementing the sampling delay between restart times.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
53 words
A method as defined in claim 15, comprising: sampling electromagnetic emission from the circuit board at a single sampling time between successive restart times; and incrementing the sampling delay through a series of fine delay increments, and incrementing the sampling delay through a series of coarse delay increments for each fine delay increment.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
59 words
A method as defined in claim 1, wherein the step of comparing the time domain representations comprises comparing samples of the sensed electromagnetic emission to upper limits and lower limits of sampled electromagnetic emission of at least one circuit board known to be operating properly to determine whether the sensed electromagnetic emission falls between the upper and lower limits.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
40 words
A method as defined in claim 1, wherein the time domain representation of the sensed electromagnetic emission is compared to a time domain representation of electromagnetic emission previously measured from at least one circuit board known to be operating properly.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
34 words
A method as defined in claim 1, wherein the time domain representation of the sensed electromagnetic emission is compared to a calculated time domain representation simulating electromagnetic emission from a properly operating circuit board.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
137 words
Apparatus for non-contact testing of an electronic circuit board, comprising: a controller for applying time dependent test signals to operate the circuit board; at least one non-contact electromagnetic emission sensing probe for sensing electromagnetic emission from a region of the circuit board near the probe while said time dependent test signals are applied to the circuit board; and a signal analyzer for developing a time domain representation of the sensed electromagnetic emission from said region, and for comparing the time domain representation of the sensed electromagnetic emission to a time domain representation of electromagnetic emission from a corresponding region of a similar circuit board subject to the same time dependent test signals, the time domain representation of the sensed electromagnetic emission comprising a signal representing evolution of the sensed electromagnetic emission over a finite period of time.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
137 words
Apparatus for non-contact testing of an electronic circuit board, comprising: a controller for applying time dependent test signals to operate the circuit board; at least one non-contact electromagnetic emission sensing probe for sensing electromagnetic emission from a region of the circuit board near the probe while said time dependent test signals are applied to the circuit board; and a signal analyzer for developing a time domain representation of the sensed electromagnetic emission from said region, and for comparing the time domain representation of the sensed electromagnetic emission to a time domain representation of electromagnetic emission from a corresponding region of a similar circuit board subject to the same time dependent test signals, the time domain representation of the sensed electromagnetic emission comprising a signal representing evolution of the sensed electromagnetic emission over a finite period of time.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
96 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 20, wherein the controller comprises: a master clock generator for generating a master clock signal; a board clock generator for generating a board clock signal for operating the circuit board under test, the board clock signal being synchronized to the master clock signal; a timing circuit for generating sampling pulses for application to the signal analyzer to trigger sampling of the electromagnetic emissions sensed by the probe, the sampling pulses being synchronized to the master clock signal; and a master processor for controlling the timing circuit according to a sampling algorithm.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
52 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 21, wherein: the master clock signal has a master clock rate; and the board clock generator is a phase lock loop responsive to the master clock signal for generating a board clock signal having a board clock rate which is a multiple of the master clock rate.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
43 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 21, wherein the master processor is operable to supply at least one test input signal to the circuit board under test to exercise the circuit board under test, each test input signal being synchronized to the master clock.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
84 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 21, wherein the timing circuit comprises: a sampling pulse generator for deriving sampling pulses from the master clock signal; and a fine delay element responsive to a fine delay select code to delay the sampling pulses relative to the master clock signal by a fine delay corresponding to the fine delay select code, the master processor being operable to cycle the fine delay select code to sample the electromagnetic emissions sensed by the probe according to the sampling algorithm.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
91 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 24, wherein: the fine delay element is responsive to the fine delay select code and the master clock signal to generate a modified master clock signal at the master clock rate, the modified master clock signal having a duty cycle which corresponds to the fine delay select code; and the sampling pulse generator comprises a phase lock loop operable to generate sampling pulses at a multiple of the master clock rate, the sampling pulses being synchronized to a trailing edge of the modified master clock signal.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
85 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 25, wherein the sampling pulse generator further comprises: a counter for counting sampling pulses; a sampling pulse gate responsive to outputs of the counter and to a coarse delay select code to compare the outputs of the counter to the coarse delay select code and to pass a sampling pulse only when the outputs of the counter match the coarse delay select code, the master processor being operable to cycle the coarse delay select code according to the sampling algorithm.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
41 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 26, wherein the master processor is operable to cycle the coarse delay select code through a full range of values for each value of the fine delay select code before changing the fine delay select code.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
43 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 20, comprising a single electromagnetic emission sensing probe, the apparatus further comprising a drive mechanism for effecting relative movement of the probe and the circuit board for sampling of electromagnetic emission from different regions of the circuit board.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
14 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 20, comprising an array of electromagnetic emission sensing probes.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
47 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 29, wherein the array of probes is a linear array, and the apparatus further comprises a drive mechanism for effecting relative movement of the probe array and the circuit board for sampling of electromagnetic emission from different regions of the circuit board.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
15 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 29, wherein the array of probes is a rectangular array.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
38 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 29, wherein the apparatus further comprises a drive mechanism for effecting relative movement of the probe array and the circuit board for sampling of electromagnetic emission from different regions of the circuit board.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
18 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 20, wherein the electromagnetic emission sensing probe is an electric field sensing probe.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
18 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 29, wherein each probe of the array is an electric field sensing probe.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
39 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 20, comprising a spacer element having a fixed spatial relationship with the probe such that the probe is disposed a short distance from the circuit board when the spacer element contacts the circuit board.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
71 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 29, comprising a plurality of spacer elements having fixed spatial relationships with respective probes of the array such that the probes are disposed a short distance from the circuit board when the spacer elements contact the circuit board, the spacer elements being compliantly mounted for relative movement on contacting the circuit board such that the probe array can conform to surface relief of the circuit board.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim
74 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 20, wherein the signal analyzer comprises at least one signal analysis element, the signal analysis element comprising: a comparison circuit for comparing signals sensed by the probe to stored signals; and a probe processor for controlling the comparison circuit to effect analog to digital conversion of the sensed signals, storage of the digital signals, recall of the digital signals and comparison of the recalled signals with the sensed signals.
Claim 40
Dependent Claim
62 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 37, wherein the comparison circuit comprises: a digital to analog converter for converting digital signals supplied by the probe processor to analog reference signals; a comparator for comparing signals sensed by the probe to the analog reference signals; and a flip-flop responsive to a sampling pulse for providing results of the signal comparison to the probe processor.
Claim 41
Dependent Claim
32 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 38, wherein the probe processor cooperates with the digital to analog converter and the comparator to digitally encode the signals sensed by the probe by successive approximation.
Claim 42
Dependent Claim
42 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 39, wherein the probe processor cooperates with the controller to perform successive comparisons of signals sensed by the respective probe to analog reference signals on successive samples to derive one bit of digital information from each sample.
Claim 43
Dependent Claim
138 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 37, wherein the comparison circuit comprises: an upper limit digital to analog converter for converting digital upper limit signals supplied by the probe processor to analog upper limit reference signals; a lower limit digital to analog converter for converting digital lower limit signals supplied by the probe processor to analog lower limit reference signals; an upper limit comparator for comparing signals sensed by the probe to the upper limit reference signals; a lower limit comparator for comparing signals sensed by the probe to the lower limit reference signals; an upper limit flip-flop responsive to a sampling pulse for providing results of the upper limit signal comparison to the probe processor; and a lower limit flip-flop responsive to a sampling pulse for providing results of the lower limit signal comparison to the probe processor.
Claim 44
Dependent Claim
71 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 29, wherein: the probes are operable such that electromagnetic emission from respective regions of the circuit board near each probe can be sensed simultaneously; and the signal analyzer is operable such that time domain representations of the electromagnetic emission sensed from plural regions are developed simultaneously and compared simultaneously to respective time domain representations of electromagnetic emission of a circuit board known to be operating properly.
Claim 45
Dependent Claim
35 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 42, wherein the signal analyzer comprises a plurality of signal analysis elements, each signal analysis element being connected to a respective probe for analysis of signals sensed by that probe.
Claim 46
Dependent Claim
54 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 42, wherein the signal analyzer comprises a plurality of signal analysis elements, each signal analysis element being connected to a respective group of probes via a multiplexor, the multiplexor being operable by the controller for successively sensing and processing signals on each probe in the respective group of probes.
Claim 47
Dependent Claim
41 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 29, wherein the signal analyzer comprises a single signal analysis element connected to all of the probes via a multiplexor, the multiplexor being operable by the controller for successively sensing and processing signals on each probe.
Claim 48
Dependent Claim
33 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 43, wherein each signal analysis element and its respective probe has a respective carrier, the carriers being mountable in close proximity to form a dense array of probes.
Claim 49
Dependent Claim
35 words
Apparatus as defined in claim 44, wherein each signal analysis element and its respective group of probes have a respective carrier, the carriers being mountable in close proximity to form a dense array of probes.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1998-04-10 | 1998-10-10 | 1999-04-11 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2002-04-10 | 2002-10-10 | 2003-04-11 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2006-04-10 | 2006-10-10 | 2007-04-11 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |