← Back to Patent Explorer
US5405384A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Astigmatic correcting intrastromal corneal ring

Assignee: Addition Tech Inc
•
Filing: 1993-12-06
•
Granted: 1995-04-11
•
Expires: 2013-12-06
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract This invention is an intrastromal corneal ring ("ICR") which is not uniform in dimension. It has, typically, two or more raised areas (or areas of additional bulk) spaced apart from each other on the ring. This ring design, when introduced into the stroma and properly adjusted there, permits at least partial correction of astigmatism in the eye.

Inventors

  • 👤 Thomas A. Silvestrini

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-08 00:14
CPC Classifications
A; A61; A61F; A61F2/00; A61F2/02; A61F2/14; A61F2/147

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 28
Claim 1
Independent Claim 104 words
A split biocompatible polymeric ring for the correction of astigmatism in an eye having a cornea, which ring has a cross section, which ring is suitable for introduction into the corneal stroma and has a circumference sufficient to substantially encircle within the cornea, in which the cross section of the ring has at least two areas of comparatively larger dimension than other cross sections of the ring and allow the ring to be rotated in the cornea and where the areas of comparatively larger dimensions subtend more than about 2° of the arc of the ring and are selected to substantially correct said astigmatism.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 104 words
A split biocompatible polymeric ring for the correction of astigmatism in an eye having a cornea, which ring has a cross section, which ring is suitable for introduction into the corneal stroma and has a circumference sufficient to substantially encircle within the cornea, in which the cross section of the ring has at least two areas of comparatively larger dimension than other cross sections of the ring and allow the ring to be rotated in the cornea and where the areas of comparatively larger dimensions subtend more than about 2° of the arc of the ring and are selected to substantially correct said astigmatism.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 16 words
The ring of claim 1 in which the cross-section has two areas of comparatively larger dimension.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 39 words
The ring of claim 2 in which the regions of comparatively larger dimension are spaced apart on the circumference of the ring at an angle measured from the center of the ring between 45° and more than about 180°.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 28 words
The ring of claim 3 in which the two areas of comparatively larger dimension are spaced on the circumference of the ring about 180° apart on the ring.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 20 words
The ring of claim 2 in which the two areas of comparatively larger dimension are not symmetrical about the ring.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 22 words
The ring of claim 1 in which the areas of larger cross section have transition regions to the areas of smaller dimension.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 16 words
The ring of claim 1 additionally comprising adjusting means for positioning the ring in the eye.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 19 words
The ring of claim 1 in which the cross section has more than two areas of comparatively larger cross-section.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 15 words
The ring of claim 1 so that the ends of the split ring are joinable.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 12 words
The ring of claim 1 comprising one or more physiologically acceptable polymers.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 10 words
The ring of claim 10 where the polymer comprises polymethylmethacrylate.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 10 words
The ring of claim 10 additionally comprising a swellable polymer.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 16 words
The ring of claim 12 in which the swellable polymer is selected from polyhydroxyethylmethylacrylate and polyvinylpyrrolidone.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 113 words
A split biocompatible polymeric ring for the correction of astigmatism in an eye having a cornea, which ring has a cross-section, which ring is suitable for introduction into a previously formed intrastromal channel encircling the cornea, has a circumference sufficient to substantially encircle within the cornea, in which the cross-section of the ring has at least one area of comparatively larger dimension and, in which the ring may be rotated within the previously formed intrastromal channel and allow the ring to be rotated in the cornea and where the areas of comparatively larger dimensions subtend more than about 2° of the arc of the ring and are selected to substantially correct said astigmatism.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 113 words
A split biocompatible polymeric ring for the correction of astigmatism in an eye having a cornea, which ring has a cross-section, which ring is suitable for introduction into a previously formed intrastromal channel encircling the cornea, has a circumference sufficient to substantially encircle within the cornea, in which the cross-section of the ring has at least one area of comparatively larger dimension and, in which the ring may be rotated within the previously formed intrastromal channel and allow the ring to be rotated in the cornea and where the areas of comparatively larger dimensions subtend more than about 2° of the arc of the ring and are selected to substantially correct said astigmatism.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 16 words
The ring of claim 14 in which the cross-section has two areas of comparatively larger dimension.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 39 words
The ring of claim 15 in which the regions of comparatively larger dimension are spaced apart on the circumference of the ring at an angle measured from the center of the ring between 45° and more than about 180°.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 28 words
The ring of claim 16 in which the two areas of comparatively larger dimension are spaced on the circumference of the ring about 180° apart on the ring.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 20 words
The ring of claim 15 in which the two areas of comparatively larger dimension are not symmetrical about the ring.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 21 words
The ring of claim 14 in which the areas of larger dimension have transition regions to the areas of smaller dimension.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 16 words
The ring of claim 14 additionally comprising adjusting means for positioning the ring in the eye.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 18 words
The ring of claim 14 in which the cross-section has more than two areas of comparatively larger cross-section.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 15 words
The ring of claim 14 so that the ends of the split ring are joinable.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 12 words
The ring of claim 14 comprising one or more physiologically acceptable polymers.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 10 words
The ring of claim 23 where the polymer comprises polymethylmethacrylate.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 10 words
The ring of claim 23 additionally comprising a swellable polymer.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim 16 words
The ring of claim 25 in which the swellable polymer is selected from polyhydroxyethylmethylacrylate and polyvinylpyrrolidone.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US4688570A Cited
GB2095119A Cited
US4452235A Cited
US5188125A Cited
US4815463A Cited
US4941093A Cited
US4994081A Cited
US5067961A Cited
US4976719A Cited
US4951744A Cited
US5089443A Cited
US5090955A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1998-04-10 1998-10-10 1999-04-11 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2002-04-10 2002-10-10 2003-04-11 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2006-04-10 2006-10-10 2007-04-11 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag