US5384526A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
PI or PID control loop with self-limiting integrator
Assignee: TECMAR TECHNOLOGIES Inc
•
Filing: 1993-07-13
•
Granted: 1995-01-24
•
Expires: 2013-07-13
Abstract
Abstract A control system having proportional and integral functions for controlling the rotational speed of a motor. The system includes a self-limiting integrator for avoiding or limiting integral wrapup, a problem commonly associated with integral control. The self-limiting integrator includes an integrator, limit comparator, OR gate, delay circuit, and sign reversal circuitry. The integrator reverses direction of integration when an error limit is realized. The error limit, a preestablished and adjustable value, can be used to determine the rise and settle time of the speed of the motor independently of the gain.
Inventors
- 👤 George J. Bennett
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 03:50
CPC Classifications
G; G05; G05B; G05B11/00; G05B11/01; G05B11/36; G05B11/42; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S388/00; Y10S388/90; Y10S388/903; Y10S388/906
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 40
Claim 1
Independent Claim
93 words
A control system, comprising: an integrator for producing a representation of a sum of an error value over time; control loop means responsive to the representation of the sum of the error value over time for producing a control output value to modify the error value; limit detection means for determining when one or more error limit values in the control loop is realized; and means responsive to the limit detection means for reversing the sign of the error value input to the integrator when one or more error limit values is realized.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
93 words
A control system, comprising: an integrator for producing a representation of a sum of an error value over time; control loop means responsive to the representation of the sum of the error value over time for producing a control output value to modify the error value; limit detection means for determining when one or more error limit values in the control loop is realized; and means responsive to the limit detection means for reversing the sign of the error value input to the integrator when one or more error limit values is realized.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
35 words
The invention of claim 1, wherein the error limit value is adjustable and the limit detection means further comprises: a system variable; and comparator means for comparing the system variable with the error limit value.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
71 words
The invention of claim 2, wherein the means responsive to the limit detection means for reversing the sign of the error value further comprises: an OR gate responsive to the comparator means for producing a sign reversal signal; and sign reversal means responsive to the OR gate for changing the sign of the error value applied to the integrator in response to a determination that the error limit value is realized.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
32 words
The invention of claim 3, wherein the comparator means for comparing the system variable with the error limit value further comprises: sampling means for sampling the system variable at a specific interval.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
11 words
The invention of claim 4, wherein the sampling means is adjustable.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
34 words
The invention of claim 5, wherein the sampling means for sampling the system variable at a specific interval further comprises: means for introducing delay time between the OR gate and the sign reversal means.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
28 words
The invention of claim 5, wherein the sampling means for sampling the system variable at a specific interval further comprises: means for introducing hysteresis into the comparator means.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
46 words
The invention of claim 5, wherein the error limit value further comprises an input limit value; the system variable further comprises an input value; and the limit detection means further comprises an input limit detection means for comparing the input value to the input limit value.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
13 words
The invention of claim 8, wherein the input value is the error value.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
46 words
The invention of claim 5, wherein the error limit value further comprises an output limit value; the system variable further comprises an output value; and the limit detection means further comprises an output limit detection means for comparing the output value to the output limit value.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
17 words
The invention of claim 5, wherein the control loop means further comprises: proportional and integral control factors.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
13 words
The invention of claim 11, wherein the parameter to be controlled is speed.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
28 words
The invention of claim 12, further comprising: means for adjusting the error limit value to control the rise time of the speed independently of the control loop gain.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
24 words
The invention of claim 13, further comprising: means for actively controlling the error limit value to vary response of the control loop as necessary.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
20 words
The invention of claim 14, further comprising: means for adjusting the error limit value to compensate for second order effects.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
20 words
The invention of claim 15, wherein the error limit value is chosen to compensate for the effect of lagging loads.
Claim 18
Independent Claim
76 words
A method for controlling a parameter to be controlled, comprising the steps of: monitoring the parameter to be controlled; generating an error signal related to a difference between the parameter and a predetermined value; integrating said error signal in a first direction to produce a control signal; reversing the sign of the error signal prior to integration when one or more error limit values is realized; and controlling the parameter in response to the control signal.
Claim 19
Independent Claim
76 words
A method for controlling a parameter to be controlled, comprising the steps of: monitoring the parameter to be controlled; generating an error signal related to a difference between the parameter and a predetermined value; integrating said error signal in a first direction to produce a control signal; reversing the sign of the error signal prior to integration when one or more error limit values is realized; and controlling the parameter in response to the control signal.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method claimed in claim 17, further comprising the step of: adjusting the error limit value to vary the response of the control signal.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
80 words
The method claimed in claim 18, wherein the step of reversing the sign of the error signal prior to integration when one or more error limit values is realized further comprises the steps of: sampling a system variable at a specific interval; comparing the system variable with the error limit value; generating error trigger signals when the system variable exceeds the error limit value; and reversing direction of integration of the error signals in response to the error trigger signals.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method claimed in claim 19, wherein the step of sampling a system variable at a specific interval further comprises the step of: introducing delay time prior to reversing the sign of the error signal.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method claimed in claim 19, wherein the step of sampling a system variable at a specific interval further comprises the step of: introducing hysteresis prior to reversing the sign of the error signal.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method claimed in claim 19, wherein the error limit value further comprises an input error limit value.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method claimed in claim 22, wherein the step of sampling a system variable at a specific interval further comprises the step of: sampling the input error limit value prior to integration.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method claimed in claim 23, wherein the step of sampling an input error limit value further comprises the step of: sampling the error signals prior to integration.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
44 words
The method claimed in claim 22, wherein the error limit value further comprises an output error limit value and the step of sampling a system variable at a specific interval further comprises the step of: sampling the output error limit value subsequent to integration.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method claimed in claim 25, wherein said step of monitoring the parameter to be controlled further comprises the step of: monitoring a speed to be controlled.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method claimed in claim 26, further comprising the step of: adjusting the error limit value to control the rise time of the speed independently of the control loop gain.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method claimed in claim 27, further comprising the step of: actively controlling the error limit value to vary the response of the control loop as necessary.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method claimed in claim 28, further comprising the step of: adjusting the error limit value to compensate for second order effects.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method claimed in claim 29, wherein the second order effects includes the effect of lagging loads.
Claim 33
Independent Claim
66 words
A method for limiting integral wrapup in a control system, comprising the steps of: integrating an error value to produce an increasing control value for use in the control system; comparing a variable in the control system with an adjustable error limit value related thereto; and integrating the error value to produce a decreasing control value when the variable reaches the error limit value related thereto.
Claim 34
Independent Claim
66 words
A method for limiting integral wrapup in a control system, comprising the steps of: integrating an error value to produce an increasing control value for use in the control system; comparing a variable in the control system with an adjustable error limit value related thereto; and integrating the error value to produce a decreasing control value when the variable reaches the error limit value related thereto.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
31 words
The invention of claim 31, further comprising the subsequent step of: integrating the error value to produce an increasing control value when the variable reaches the error limit value related thereto.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
12 words
The invention of claim 32, wherein the variable is the error value.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
12 words
The invention of claim 33, wherein the variable is the control value.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
42 words
The invention of claim 34, further comprising the following step preliminary to integration: applying the error value to a sign reversal component to change the sign of the error signal being integrated when the variable reaches the error limit value related thereto.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim
23 words
The invention of claim 35, further comprising the step of: adjusting the error limit value to vary the response of the control value.
Claim 40
Dependent Claim
26 words
The invention of claim 36, further comprising the step of: actively controlling the error limit value to vary the response of the control system as necessary.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4319173A
Cited
US4872104A
Cited
US4893068A
Cited
US5134354A
Cited
US5265188A
Cited
US5231341A
Cited
US5223778A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1998-01-23 | 1998-07-25 | 1999-01-24 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2002-01-23 | 2002-07-25 | 2003-01-24 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2006-01-23 | 2006-07-25 | 2007-01-24 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |