← Back to Patent Explorer
US5361199A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Automated procurement system with multi-system data access

Assignee: Texas Instruments Inc
•
Filing: 1990-07-31
•
Granted: 1994-11-01
•
Expires: 2010-07-31
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract An automated procurement system, in which a buyer workstation is in communication with a mainframe database that stores global data relevant to procurement documents and reports. The workstation is programmed with an interactive buyer interface that displays procurement documents, provides support data to aid in decision-making, and provides various document attachments. Data is uploaded and downloaded to and from the mainframe and the workstation in a manner that is transparent to the buyer.

Inventors

  • 👤 Kenneth M. Shoquist
  • 👤 Gary C. Young
  • 👤 Amy L. Mathis
  • 👤 Bob W. Withers

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-01 23:23
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06Q; G06Q10/00; G06Q10/08; G06Q10/087; G06Q30/00; G06Q30/06; G06Q30/0601; G06Q30/0623; G06Q30/0625; G06Q30/0641

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim 294 words
A method performed by a computer system implementing an automated procurement system including a mainframe computer, a global database, a local database and a server computer, comprising the computer performed steps of: storing global data in said global database of said mainframe computer, said mainframe computer being programmed with mainframe transfer software; storing local data in said local database of said server computer, said server computer being programmed with server transfer software so that said server computer is in communication with said mainframe computer; controlling by said server computer a workstation for interactive input and output with a buyer, said workstation being programmed with a buyer interface, and said workstation being in communication with said server computer; accessing said buyer interface to permit said buyer to process procurement documents; determining by said server computer whether process data corresponding to said process of said procurement documents is located in said global data in said global database or in said local data in said local database; controlling by said computer system a manager system to approve said procurement documents after said procurement documents are processed; and providing, by said mainframe transfer software and said server transfer software, said process data to said buyer so that a location of said process data is determined without interaction of said buyer; and wherein the method further comprises the step of supplying said global data from said global database for use by said buyer for decision-making; and wherein said global data includes supplier rankings including criteria data to rank each supplier with respect to other suppliers, and the method further comprises the steps of determining by the computer system said supplier rankings, displaying said supplier rankings on said workstation, and receiving input from said buyer responsive to said supplier rankings.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 294 words
A method performed by a computer system implementing an automated procurement system including a mainframe computer, a global database, a local database and a server computer, comprising the computer performed steps of: storing global data in said global database of said mainframe computer, said mainframe computer being programmed with mainframe transfer software; storing local data in said local database of said server computer, said server computer being programmed with server transfer software so that said server computer is in communication with said mainframe computer; controlling by said server computer a workstation for interactive input and output with a buyer, said workstation being programmed with a buyer interface, and said workstation being in communication with said server computer; accessing said buyer interface to permit said buyer to process procurement documents; determining by said server computer whether process data corresponding to said process of said procurement documents is located in said global data in said global database or in said local data in said local database; controlling by said computer system a manager system to approve said procurement documents after said procurement documents are processed; and providing, by said mainframe transfer software and said server transfer software, said process data to said buyer so that a location of said process data is determined without interaction of said buyer; and wherein the method further comprises the step of supplying said global data from said global database for use by said buyer for decision-making; and wherein said global data includes supplier rankings including criteria data to rank each supplier with respect to other suppliers, and the method further comprises the steps of determining by the computer system said supplier rankings, displaying said supplier rankings on said workstation, and receiving input from said buyer responsive to said supplier rankings.
Claim 3
Independent Claim 216 words
A method performed by a computer system for automated procurement, using an interactive workstation having a local database and a buyer interface, in communication with a mainframe having a global database, comprising the computer performed steps of: displaying a plurality of documents used for procurement on said workstation, said documents including queries for data to be supplied by a buyer; selecting a document on said workstation from said documents; determining by said workstation whether support data is needed for processing said selected document and supporting said selected document is located in said global database; retrieving by said workstation said support data from said global database if needed to support said selected document in accordance with said determining step; displaying said support data on said interactive workstation if needed to support said selected document in accordance with said determining step; ranking by said computer system suppliers to rank each supplier with respect to other suppliers in response to a request for said support data; receiving input data from said buyer in response to displaying said support data for processing said document, by using said buyer interface; and updating and maintaining said support data so that said support data in said local database is the same as said support data in said global database by said computer system.
Claim 4
Independent Claim 216 words
A method performed by a computer system for automated procurement, using an interactive workstation having a local database and a buyer interface, in communication with a mainframe having a global database, comprising the computer performed steps of: displaying a plurality of documents used for procurement on said workstation, said documents including queries for data to be supplied by a buyer; selecting a document on said workstation from said documents; determining by said workstation whether support data is needed for processing said selected document and supporting said selected document is located in said global database; retrieving by said workstation said support data from said global database if needed to support said selected document in accordance with said determining step; displaying said support data on said interactive workstation if needed to support said selected document in accordance with said determining step; ranking by said computer system suppliers to rank each supplier with respect to other suppliers in response to a request for said support data; receiving input data from said buyer in response to displaying said support data for processing said document, by using said buyer interface; and updating and maintaining said support data so that said support data in said local database is the same as said support data in said global database by said computer system.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 33 words
The method of claim 2, wherein said method further comprises the step of routing said document to appropriate users of other computer systems, said other computer systems being in communication with said mainframe.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 27 words
The method of claim 2, wherein said method further comprises the step of using said workstation to inform said buyer of a worklist of documents requiring processing.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 40 words
The method of claim 4, wherein said worklists include a line of data representing a single document and the method further comprises the step of selecting an additional document from said worklist to be initialized for display of additional data.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 25 words
The method of claim 4, wherein said method further comprises the step of sorting said worklist according to a data field selected by said buyer.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 24 words
The method of claim 2, wherein said method further comprises the step of selecting and processing attachments to said selected document by said buyer.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 25 words
The method of claim 2, wherein the method further comprises the step of determining said support data needed for processing, by using said buyer interface.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US4635189A Cited
US4851988A Cited
US4897781A Cited
US4939689A Cited
US5208665A Cited
US5109515A Cited
US5008853A Cited
US5124909A Cited
US4961148A Cited
US5136501A Cited
US5101353A Cited
US5101352A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1997-10-31 1998-05-02 1998-11-01 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2001-10-31 2002-05-02 2002-11-01 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2005-10-31 2006-05-02 2006-11-01 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag