US5345385A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for detecting driving situation with respect to vehicle yaw behavior
Assignee: Mercedes Benz Group AG
•
Filing: 1992-07-01
•
Granted: 1994-09-06
•
Expires: 2012-07-01
Abstract
Abstract A method detects the driving situation with respect to the yaw behavior of the vehicle, in which a desired value of the vehicle yaw angle rate μ des is derived in a computer unit from measured values (such as vehicle speed, steering wheel angle), and at least one sensor signal is supplied to the computer unit from which the actual value of the vehicle yaw angle rate μ act is derived. The difference between the desired value of the yaw angle rate μ des and the actual value of the yaw angle rate μ act is formed in the computer unit. The actual value of the yaw angle rate μ act is subtracted from the desired value of the yaw angle rate μ des , and at least one output signal is generated in and emitted by the computer unit from this difference. The output signal represents the detected driving situation with respect to the yaw behavior of the vehicle. The magnitude of the time derivative of the difference is used to derive whether there is a tendency towards an increasingly critical driving situation.
Inventors
- 👤 Adam Zomotor
- 👤 Walter Klinkner
- 👤 Erich Schindler
- 👤 Frank-Werner Mohn
- 👤 Thomas Wohland
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-07 19:05
CPC Classifications
B; B62; B62D; B62D6/00; B60; B60T; B60T8/00; B60T8/17; B60T8/1755; G; G05; G05D; G05D1/00; G05D1/08; G05D1/0891
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 13
Claim 1
Independent Claim
259 words
A method for detecting an undesired yaw behavior of a vehicle, which behavior produces instability, comprising the steps of forming a desired value of the vehicle yaw angle rate μ des in a computer unit from values measured by sensors on the vehicle, supplying to the computer unit at least one sensor signal to form an actual value of the vehicle yaw angle rate μ act , determining in the computer unit any difference between the desired value of the yaw angle rate μ des and the actual value of the yaw angle rate μ act , by subtracting the actual value of the yaw angle rate μ act from the desired value of the yaw angle rate μ des , forming a time derivative of the difference in the computer unit, and generating at least one output signal in the computer unit, said at least one output signal representing the detected undesired yaw behavior of the vehicle and is used to permit intervention in a control system of the vehicle to one of increase understeering handling and to reduce oversteering handling, wherein a first part of said at least one output signal is generated in the computer unit as a function of the difference, said first part being representative of understeering or oversteering handling of the vehicle, and a second part of the output signal is generated in the computer unit as a function of the time derivative of the difference, said second part being representative of an instability increase or decrease in the handling of the vehicle.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
259 words
A method for detecting an undesired yaw behavior of a vehicle, which behavior produces instability, comprising the steps of forming a desired value of the vehicle yaw angle rate μ des in a computer unit from values measured by sensors on the vehicle, supplying to the computer unit at least one sensor signal to form an actual value of the vehicle yaw angle rate μ act , determining in the computer unit any difference between the desired value of the yaw angle rate μ des and the actual value of the yaw angle rate μ act , by subtracting the actual value of the yaw angle rate μ act from the desired value of the yaw angle rate μ des , forming a time derivative of the difference in the computer unit, and generating at least one output signal in the computer unit, said at least one output signal representing the detected undesired yaw behavior of the vehicle and is used to permit intervention in a control system of the vehicle to one of increase understeering handling and to reduce oversteering handling, wherein a first part of said at least one output signal is generated in the computer unit as a function of the difference, said first part being representative of understeering or oversteering handling of the vehicle, and a second part of the output signal is generated in the computer unit as a function of the time derivative of the difference, said second part being representative of an instability increase or decrease in the handling of the vehicle.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
73 words
The method according to claim 1, wherein a variable MULT is determined in the computer unit by multiplying the difference by the mathematical sign of the yaw angle rate μ act , and generating an output signal representative of said understeering handling of the vehicle when the variable MULT is less than zero and an output signal which represents said oversteering handling of the vehicle when the variable MULT is greater than zero.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
81 words
The method according to claim 2, wherein a variable DIFF is determined in the computer unit by multiplying the time derivative of the difference by the mathematical sign of the yaw angle rate μ act and generating by the mathematical sign of the variable MULT, and an output signal representative of an increase in vehicle instability when the variable DIFF is greater than zero and an output signal representative of an instability decrease when the variable DIFF is less than zero.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method according to claim 2, wherein an output signal representative of the order of magnitude of the understeering or oversteering handling is generated in the computer unit as a function of the value of the variable MULT.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method according to claim 3, wherein an output signal representative of the order of magnitude of the instability increase or instability decrease is generated in the computer unit as a function of the value of the variable DIFF.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method according to claim 1, wherein a warning device, arranged to be monitored by a vehicle driver, is operable as a function of said at least one output signal.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
40 words
The method according to claim 6, wherein an output signal representative of a tendency towards an increasingly critical driving situation, is generated in the computer unit when the magnitude of the time derivative of the difference exceeds a threshold value.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
73 words
The method according to claim 6, wherein a variable MULT is determined in the computer unit by multiplying the difference by the mathematical sign of the yaw angle rate μ act , and generating an output signal representative of said understeering handling of the vehicle when the variable MULT is less than zero and an output signal representative of said oversteering handling of the vehicle when the variable MULT is greater than zero.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
79 words
The method according to claim 8, wherein a variable DIFF is determined in the computer unit by multiplying the time derivative of the difference by the mathematical sign of the yaw angle rate μ act and by the mathematical sign of the variable MULT, and generating an output signal representative of an instability increase when the variable DIFF is greater than zero and an output signal representative of an instability decrease when the variable DIFF is less than zero.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method according to claim 9, wherein an output signal representative of the order of magnitude of the instability increase or instability decrease is generated in the computer unit as a function of the value of the variable DIFF.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method according to claim 3, wherein an intervention into at least one of the steering and braking of individual wheels of the vehicle occurs as a function of said at least one output signal.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method according to claim 11, wherein an output signal representative of the order of magnitude of the instability increase or instability decrease is generated in the computer unit as a function of the value of the variable DIFF.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
EP0150856A2
Cited
US4834204A
Cited
DE3608420A1
Cited
US4706979A
Cited
WO1988000542A2
Cited
US5001636A
Cited
WO1989002842A1
Cited
DE3919347A1
Cited
US5001637A
Cited
US5159553A
Cited
US5019982A
Cited
DE4010332A1
Cited
EP0392165A1
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1997-09-05 | 1998-03-07 | 1998-09-06 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2001-09-05 | 2002-03-07 | 2002-09-06 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2005-09-05 | 2006-03-07 | 2006-09-06 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |