Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 50
Claim 1
Independent Claim
58 words
A diffraction grating of reflective or transmissive lines formed by a regular matrix of pixels each containing at least a respective curvilinear portion of one or more of said lines, which pixels when illuminated each generate a two-dimensional optical catastrophe image diffraction pattern whereby the total image diffraction pattern of the grating is optically variable but structurally stable.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
58 words
A diffraction grating of reflective or transmissive lines formed by a regular matrix of pixels each containing at least a respective curvilinear portion of one or more of said lines, which pixels when illuminated each generate a two-dimensional optical catastrophe image diffraction pattern whereby the total image diffraction pattern of the grating is optically variable but structurally stable.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
156 words
The grating of claim 1, wherein said reflective/transmissive lines of the grating are advantageously such that they are defined, in terms of coordinates x,y in the plane of the grating, by the equation S(x,y)=kN where k is a scaling factor, N is an integer and the function S(x,y) is given by: S(x,y)=W(x,y)+P(x,y)+C(x,y) (1) where S(x,y) is the initial phase function generated by the grating when illuminated normally by a collimated monochromatic light wave, W(x,y) is a carrier wave of non-zero order, P(x,y) is a picture or portrait function which determines the broad shape of the image diffraction pattern, and is piecewise relatively slowly varying with respect to x and y, and C(x,y) is a periodic lattice function of x, y which varies relatively rapidly with respect to x and y and whose Hessian is not identically zero except along certain characteristic lines corresponding to the caustics in the Fresnel or Fraunhofer diffraction pattern of the grating.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
34 words
The grating of claim 2, wherein the Hessian of C(x,y) is: [∂.sup.2 C(x,y)/∂x.sup.2 ].[∂.sup.2 C(x,y)/∂y.sup.2 ]-[∂.sup.2 C(x,y,)/∂x∂y].sup.2 ( 2) with the proviso that the Hessian be not identically zero except along predetermined characteristic lines.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
54 words
The grating of claim 2 or 3, wherein the right side of the equation for the function S(x,y) includes a focussing term of the form F(x,y)=b 1 x 2 +b 2 y 2 where b 1 and b 2 are constants chosen to focus the diffracted waves at the required distance from the grating.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
16 words
The grating of claim 1, wherein said pixels are less than 1 mm 2 in area.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
17 words
The grating of claim 5, wherein said pixels are between 0.25 and 0.75 mm 2 in area.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
29 words
The grating of claim 5, wherein said reflective lines and grooves selected from square cut grooves and sinusoidal cut grooves or a combination of square and sinusoidal cut grooves.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
73 words
A security device having improved contrast properties comprising a diffraction grating of reflective or transmissive lines, comprising a multiplicity of diffraction grating regions, which are at least partly separated by a multiplicity of grating free regions, each grating free region having a dimension which is at least large enough to be resolved by the human eye, the grating free regions not exceeding about 20 to 50% of the total area of the grating.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
73 words
A security device having improved contrast properties comprising a diffraction grating of reflective or transmissive lines, comprising a multiplicity of diffraction grating regions, which are at least partly separated by a multiplicity of grating free regions, each grating free region having a dimension which is at least large enough to be resolved by the human eye, the grating free regions not exceeding about 20 to 50% of the total area of the grating.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
49 words
The device of claim 8, wherein said diffraction grating comprises a regular matrix of pixels each defining a said diffraction grating region which, when illuminated, each generate a two-dimensional optical catastrophe image diffraction pattern whereby the total image diffraction pattern of the grating is optically variable but structurally stable.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
43 words
The grating of claim 8 or 9, wherein each grating region and each grating free region is no smaller than the resolution of the human eye, said grating free regions not exceeding about 20 to 50% of the total area of the grating.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
24 words
The device of claim 8 or 9, wherein said grating free regions do not exceed about 30% of the total area of the grating.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
29 words
The device of claim 8 or 9, wherein the diffraction grating within each pixel or within said grating region is selected to generate strong moire effects when contact printed.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
156 words
The security device of claim 9, wherein said reflective/transmissive lines of the grating are advantageously such that they are defined, in terms of coordinates x,y in the plane of the grating, by the equation S(x,y)=kN where k is a scaling factor, N is an integer and the function S(x,y) is given by: S(x,y)=W(x,y)+P(x,y)+C(x,y) (1) where S(x,y) is the initial phase function generated by the grating when illuminated normally by a collimated monochromatic light wave, W(x,y) is a carrier wave of non-zero order, P(x,y) is a picture or portrait function which determines the broad shape of the image diffraction pattern, and is piecewise relatively slowly varying with respect to x and y, and C(x,y) is a periodic lattice function of x,y which varies relatively rapidly with respect to x and y and whose Hessian is not identically zero except along certain characteristic lines corresponding to the caustics in the Fresnel or Fraunhofer diffraction pattern of the grating.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
35 words
The security device of claim 13, wherein the Hessian of C(x,y) is: [∂.sup.2 C(x,y)/∂x.sup.2 ].[∂.sup.2 C(x,y)/∂y.sup.2 ]-[∂.sup.2 C(x,y,)/∂x∂y].sup.2 ( 2) with the proviso that the Hessian be not identically zero except along predetermined characteristic lines.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
55 words
The security device of claim 13 or 14, wherein the right side of the equation for the function S(x,y) includes a focussing term of the form F(x,y)=b 1 x 2 +b 2 y 2 wherein b 1 and b 2 are constants chosen to focus the diffracted waves at the required distance from the grating.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
19 words
The security device of claim 9 or 13, wherein said pixels are less than 1 mm 2 in area.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
18 words
The security device of claim 16, wherein said pixels are between 0.25 and 0.75 mm 2 in area.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
94 words
A security device comprising a plastic film grating configured to form part of a currency note or credit card, wherein said grating is a pixellated diffraction grating in which each pixel is an individual diffraction grating of reflecting or transmissive lines, said security device, when illuminated, generating an image that is optically variable with position of view and that retains its structural stability in that the observed intensity of diffracted light from a particular point on the grating surface changes smoothly when the grating surface is crinkled in the vicinity of the observed point.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
94 words
A security device comprising a plastic film grating configured to form part of a currency note or credit card, wherein said grating is a pixellated diffraction grating in which each pixel is an individual diffraction grating of reflecting or transmissive lines, said security device, when illuminated, generating an image that is optically variable with position of view and that retains its structural stability in that the observed intensity of diffracted light from a particular point on the grating surface changes smoothly when the grating surface is crinkled in the vicinity of the observed point.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
28 words
The device of claim 18, wherein each individual diffraction grating is constructed to induce color tone effects in said image that are optically variable with position of view.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
16 words
The device of claim 18, wherein said pixels are less than 1 mm 2 in area.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
17 words
The device of claim 20, wherein said pixels are between 0.25 and 0.75 mm 2 in area.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
24 words
The device of claim 18, wherein one or more of the individual diffraction gratings are constructed to produce strong moire effects when contact printed.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
69 words
A security device comprising a plastic film grating configured to form part of a currency note or credit card, wherein said grating is a pixellated diffraction grating in which each pixel is an individual diffraction grating of reflecting or transmissive lines, said security device, when illuminated, generating an optically variable but structurally stable image, wherein each individual diffraction grating generates a two-dimensional optical catastrophe image diffraction pattern when illuminated.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
69 words
A security device comprising a plastic film grating configured to form part of a currency note or credit card, wherein said grating is a pixellated diffraction grating in which each pixel is an individual diffraction grating of reflecting or transmissive lines, said security device, when illuminated, generating an optically variable but structurally stable image, wherein each individual diffraction grating generates a two-dimensional optical catastrophe image diffraction pattern when illuminated.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
27 words
The device of claim 23, wherein said diffraction grating is constructed to induce color tone effects in said image that are optically variable with position of view.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
155 words
The device of claim 23, wherein said reflective/transmissive lines of the grating are advantageously such that they are defined, in terms of coordinates x,y in the plane of the grating, by the equation S(x,y)=kN where k is a scaling factor, N is an integer and the function S(x,y) is given by: S(x,y)=W(x,y)+P(x,y)+C(x,y) (1) where S(x,y) is the initial phase function generated by the grating when illuminated normally by a collimated monochromatic light wave, W(x,y) is a carrier wave of non-zero order, P(x,y) is a picture or portrait function which determines the broad shape of the image diffraction pattern, and is piecewise relatively slowly varying with respect to x and y, and C(x,y) is a periodic lattice function of x,y which varies relatively rapidly with respect to x and y and whose Hessian is not identically zero except along certain characteristic lines corresponding to the caustics in the Fresnel or Fraunhofer diffraction pattern of the grating.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
34 words
The device of claim 25, wherein the Hessian of C(x,y) is: [∂.sup.2 C(x,y)/∂x.sup.2 ].[∂.sup.2 C(x,y)/∂y.sup.2 ]-[∂.sup.2 C(x,y,)/∂x∂y].sup.2 ( 2) with the proviso that the Hessian be not identically zero except along predetermined characteristic lines.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
52 words
The device of claim 25, wherein the right side of the equation for the function S(x,y) includes a focussing term of the form F(x,y)=b 1 x 2 +b 2 y 2 wherein b 1 and b 2 are constants chosen to focus the diffracted waves at the required distance from the grating.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
21 words
The device of claim 18 or 23, wherein the plastic film grating is metallized and has an outer protective plastic coating.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
13 words
A currency note having the device of claim 18 or 23 attached thereto.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
13 words
A credit card having the device of claim 18 or 23 attached thereto.
Claim 35
Independent Claim
83 words
A method of providing an item susceptible to counterfeiting with a diffraction grating, comprising scanning an optically invariable image to form a matrix of pixellated portions of said image, then producing from said pixellated portions a pixellated diffraction grating in which each pixel is an individual diffraction grating of reflective or transmissive lines each including a said pixellated portion of said image, said diffraction grating, when illuminated, generating an optically variable but structurally stable image; and then attaching said grating to the item.
Claim 36
Independent Claim
83 words
A method of providing an item susceptible to counterfeiting with a diffraction grating, comprising scanning an optically invariable image to form a matrix of pixellated portions of said image, then producing from said pixellated portions a pixellated diffraction grating in which each pixel is an individual diffraction grating of reflective or transmissive lines each including a said pixellated portion of said image, said diffraction grating, when illuminated, generating an optically variable but structurally stable image; and then attaching said grating to the item.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 31, wherein each individual diffraction grating is less than 1 mm 2 in area.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method of claim 32, wherein said area is between 0.25 and 0.75 mm 2 .
Claim 39
Independent Claim
126 words
A method of providing an item susceptible to counterfeiting with a diffraction grating, comprising scanning an optically invariable image to form a matrix of pixellated portions of said image, then producing from said pixellated portions a pixellated diffraction grating in which each pixel is an individual diffraction grating of reflective or transmissive lines each including a said pixellated portion of said image, said diffraction grating, when illuminated, generating an optically variable but structurally stable image, and attaching said grating to the item, the method further comprising selecting parameters for each individual diffraction grating from one or more of brightness, stability, color, orientation, distance and angle at which the optically variable image has maximum clarity and the light source giving maximum effect to the optically variable image.
Claim 40
Independent Claim
126 words
A method of providing an item susceptible to counterfeiting with a diffraction grating, comprising scanning an optically invariable image to form a matrix of pixellated portions of said image, then producing from said pixellated portions a pixellated diffraction grating in which each pixel is an individual diffraction grating of reflective or transmissive lines each including a said pixellated portion of said image, said diffraction grating, when illuminated, generating an optically variable but structurally stable image, and attaching said grating to the item, the method further comprising selecting parameters for each individual diffraction grating from one or more of brightness, stability, color, orientation, distance and angle at which the optically variable image has maximum clarity and the light source giving maximum effect to the optically variable image.
Claim 41
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 31 or 34, further comprising constructing one or more of said individual diffraction gratings in a manner which produces strong moire effects when contact printed.
Claim 42
Dependent Claim
51 words
The method of claim 31 or 34, wherein said step of producing said grating further comprises producing a master die and then producing a plastic film replica grating from the master die, then metallizing the plastic film replica grating, and then coating the metallized plastic film with a protective plastic coating.
Claim 43
Independent Claim
96 words
A method of forming a diffraction grating, comprising scanning an optically invariable image to form a matrix of pixellated portions of said image, producing from said pixellated portions a pixellated diffraction grating in which each pixel is an individual diffraction grating of reflective or transmissive lines each including a said pixellated portion of said image, said diffraction grating, when illuminated, generating an optically variable but structurally stable image, the method further comprising forming said reflecting or transmissive lines in a manner which generates, when the diffraction grating is illuminated, a two-dimensional optical catastrophe image diffraction pattern.
Claim 44
Independent Claim
96 words
A method of forming a diffraction grating, comprising scanning an optically invariable image to form a matrix of pixellated portions of said image, producing from said pixellated portions a pixellated diffraction grating in which each pixel is an individual diffraction grating of reflective or transmissive lines each including a said pixellated portion of said image, said diffraction grating, when illuminated, generating an optically variable but structurally stable image, the method further comprising forming said reflecting or transmissive lines in a manner which generates, when the diffraction grating is illuminated, a two-dimensional optical catastrophe image diffraction pattern.
Claim 45
Dependent Claim
150 words
The method of claim 37, comprising forming said reflecting/transmissive lines of each individual grating in terms of coordinates x,y in the plane of the grating, by the equation S(x,y)=kN where k is a scaling factor, N is an integer and the function S(x,y) is given by: S(x,y)=W(x,y)+P(x,y)+C(x,y) (1) where S(x,y) is the initial phase function generated by the grating when illuminated normally by a collimated monochromatic light wave, W(x,y) is a carrier wave or non-zero order, P(x,y) is a picture or portrait function which determines the broad shape of the image diffraction pattern, and is piecewise relatively slowly varying with respect to x and y, and C(x,y) is a periodic lattice function of x,y which varies relatively rapidly with respect to x and y and whose Hessian is not identically zero except along certain characteristic lines corresponding to the caustics in the Fresnel or Fraunhofer diffraction pattern of the grating.
Claim 46
Dependent Claim
44 words
The method of claim 38, further comprising forming said reflective/transmissive lines in a manner such that the Hessian of C(x,y) is: [∂.sup.2 C(x,y)/∂x.sup.2 ].[∂.sup.2 C(x,y)/∂y.sup.2 ]-[∂.sup.2 C(x,y,)/∂x∂y].sup.2 ( 2) with the proviso that the Hessian be not identically zero except along predetermined characteristic lines.
Claim 47
Dependent Claim
59 words
The method of claim 39, further comprising forming the reflective/transmissive lines such that the right side of the equation for the function S(x,y) includes a focussing term of the form F(x,y)=b 1 x 2 +b 2 y 2 wherein b 1 and b 2 are constants chosen to focus the diffracted waves at the required distance from the grating.
Claim 48
Independent Claim
146 words
A method of providing an item susceptible to counterfeiting with a diffraction grating, comprising scanning an optically invariable image to form a matrix of pixellated portions of said image, then producing from said pixellated portions a pixellated diffraction grating in which each pixel is an individual diffraction grating of reflective or transmissive lines each including a said pixellated portion of said image, said diffraction grating, when illuminated, generating an optically variable but structurally stable image, and attaching said grating to the item, the method further comprising forming each individual diffraction grating so that they are at least partly separated from each other by a multiplicity of grating free regions, each grating free region having a dimension which is at least large enough to be resolved by the human eye, the grating free regions not exceeding about 20% to 50% of the total area of the grating.
Claim 49
Independent Claim
146 words
A method of providing an item susceptible to counterfeiting with a diffraction grating, comprising scanning an optically invariable image to form a matrix of pixellated portions of said image, then producing from said pixellated portions a pixellated diffraction grating in which each pixel is an individual diffraction grating of reflective or transmissive lines each including a said pixellated portion of said image, said diffraction grating, when illuminated, generating an optically variable but structurally stable image, and attaching said grating to the item, the method further comprising forming each individual diffraction grating so that they are at least partly separated from each other by a multiplicity of grating free regions, each grating free region having a dimension which is at least large enough to be resolved by the human eye, the grating free regions not exceeding about 20% to 50% of the total area of the grating.
Claim 50
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 41, wherein said grating free regions do not exceed about 30% of the total area of the grating.