US5317316A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of altitude track initialization in an aircraft tracking system
Assignee: L3 Technologies Inc
•
Filing: 1992-12-22
•
Granted: 1994-05-31
•
Expires: 2012-12-22
Abstract
Abstract A method of processing a plurality of replies of target aircraft provided in response to interrogation signals from the surveillance aircraft during surveillance periods to determine whether an altitude track may be initialized for use in a traffic alert and collision avoidance system includes the step of selecting three replies, one from each of three consecutive surveillance periods. The replies have binary or coded altitude data of high or low confidence. The binary or coded altitude data of non-adjacent and adjacent replies of the selected replies are compared and an altitude difference value for each of the comparisons is generated. Further efforts to initialize a track are discarded if any of the altitude difference values are greater than first predetermined separated altitudes if and only if such compared non-adjacent and adjacent replies have binary or coded altitude data of high confidence. The binary or coded altitude data of the non-adjacent and adjacent replies are further compared whether or not the replies have binary data of low or high confidence to determine whether an altitude track may be initialized. The process applies if the altitude data is Gilham code, binary, or other encoded data with single bit errors.
Inventors
- 👤 Patricia K. Sturm
- 👤 Kathryn W. Ybarra
- 👤 Lewis R. Motisher
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-25 08:28
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01S; G01S13/00; G01S13/74; G01S13/76; G01S13/765; G01S13/78; G01S13/781; G01S13/784; G01S13/88; G01S13/93; G01S13/933
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 9
Claim 1
Independent Claim
177 words
A method of processing a plurality of replies of target aircraft provided in response to interrogation signals from a surveillance aircraft during surveillance periods to determine whether an altitude track may be initialized for use in a traffic alert and collision avoidance system, said method comprising the steps of: selecting three replies, one from each of three consecutive surveillance periods, said replies having binary or coded altitude data of high or low confidence; comparing the binary or coded altitude data of non-adjacent and adjacent replies of the selected replies and generating an altitude difference value for each of the comparisons; discarding further efforts to initialize a track if any of the altitude difference values are greater than first predetermined separated altitudes if and only if such non-adjacent and adjacent replies have binary or coded altitude data of high confidence; and further comparing the binary or coded altitude data of the non-adjacent and the adjacent replies whether or not the replies have binary data of low or high confidence to determine whether an altitude track may be initialized.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
177 words
A method of processing a plurality of replies of target aircraft provided in response to interrogation signals from a surveillance aircraft during surveillance periods to determine whether an altitude track may be initialized for use in a traffic alert and collision avoidance system, said method comprising the steps of: selecting three replies, one from each of three consecutive surveillance periods, said replies having binary or coded altitude data of high or low confidence; comparing the binary or coded altitude data of non-adjacent and adjacent replies of the selected replies and generating an altitude difference value for each of the comparisons; discarding further efforts to initialize a track if any of the altitude difference values are greater than first predetermined separated altitudes if and only if such non-adjacent and adjacent replies have binary or coded altitude data of high confidence; and further comparing the binary or coded altitude data of the non-adjacent and the adjacent replies whether or not the replies have binary data of low or high confidence to determine whether an altitude track may be initialized.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
172 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein said further comparing step comprises the steps of: correlating the selected replies such that the selected replies may be used to initialize an altitude track regardless of whether the replies have binary or coded altitude data of high or low confidence if the altitude difference values of compared adjacent replies are less than second predetermined separated altitudes; and correlating the replies regardless of whether the replies have binary or coded altitude data of high or low confidence if the altitude difference value of one of the compared adjacent replies or the non-adjacent replies is less than third predetermined separated altitudes and only if the binary or coded altitude data of the replies of said one of the compared adjacent replies or the non-adjacent replies is not more than one bit different than the binary or coded altitude of the reply which is not part of said one of the compared adjacent replies or the non-adjacent replies which was less than the third predetermined separated altitudes.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
103 words
A method according to claim 2, further comprising the step of selecting an initial altitude of an altitude track allowed to be initialized upon correlation of the selected replies, the selecting step including the steps of: choosing the altitude of the reply of the most recent surveillance period if such reply has binary or coded altitude data of high confidence; and selecting the altitude of the reply in the most recent surveillance period of said one of adjacent replies or nonadjacent replies leading to the initialization of a track if all the selected replies have binary or coded altitude data of low confidence.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
57 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein said first predetermined separated altitudes include a non-adjacent predetermined altitude separation for comparison to altitude difference values of compared non-adjacent replies and an adjacent predetermined altitude separation for comparison to altitude difference values of compared adjacent replies, the adjacent predetermined altitude separation being less than the non-adjacent predetermined altitude separation.
Claim 6
Independent Claim
183 words
A method of processing a plurality of replies of target aircraft provided in response to interrogation signals from a surveillance aircraft during surveillance periods to determine whether an altitude track may be initialized for use in a traffic alert and collision avoidance system, said method comprising the steps of: selecting a reply having binary or coded altitude data of high or low confidence from three consecutive surveillance periods; comparing the binary or coded altitude data of each of the selected replies to the binary or coded altitude data of the other selected replies; generating altitude value differences representative of a difference in altitude of each comparison and bit difference values representative of whether a certain number of bits of the binary or coded altitude data are different for the replies of each comparison; and comparing the altitude value differences to predetermined altitude difference values and the bit difference values to a predetermined number of bits to determine depending on whether the binary or coded altitude data is of high or low confidence whether the altitude track may be initialized from the selected replies.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
183 words
A method of processing a plurality of replies of target aircraft provided in response to interrogation signals from a surveillance aircraft during surveillance periods to determine whether an altitude track may be initialized for use in a traffic alert and collision avoidance system, said method comprising the steps of: selecting a reply having binary or coded altitude data of high or low confidence from three consecutive surveillance periods; comparing the binary or coded altitude data of each of the selected replies to the binary or coded altitude data of the other selected replies; generating altitude value differences representative of a difference in altitude of each comparison and bit difference values representative of whether a certain number of bits of the binary or coded altitude data are different for the replies of each comparison; and comparing the altitude value differences to predetermined altitude difference values and the bit difference values to a predetermined number of bits to determine depending on whether the binary or coded altitude data is of high or low confidence whether the altitude track may be initialized from the selected replies.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
343 words
A method according to claim 5, wherein the step of comparing the altitude value differences with the predetermined altitude difference values and the bit difference values to the predetermined number of bits comprises the steps of: comparing the altitude value differences of each comparison of replies to first predetermined altitude difference ranges if the binary or coded altitude data of each selected reply is of high confidence; allowing an altitude track to be initialized if all the altitude value differences of each comparison fall within the first predetermined altitude difference ranges; comparing the altitude value differences of comparisons of replies made between adjacent selected replies to second predetermined altitude difference ranges whether or not the binary or coded altitude data of the replies is of low or high confidence; allowing an altitude track to be initialized if all the altitude value differences of comparisons made between adjacent selected replies fall within the second predetermined altitude difference ranges; comparing the altitude value differences of each comparison of replies to third predetermined altitude difference ranges and the bit difference values of each comparison of replies to the predetermined number of bits whether or not the binary or coded altitude data is of low or high confidence; and allowing an altitude track to be initialized if the altitude value differences of comparisons of adjacent selected replies fall within the third predetermined altitude difference ranges and the bit difference values of each reply of the adjacent replies which fall within the third predetermined altitude difference ranges as compared to the reply which is not one of the adjacent replies are less than the predetermined number of bits and allowing an altitude track to be initialized if the altitude value difference of the comparison of non-adjacent selected replies falls within the third required altitude difference ranges and the bit difference values of each of the replies of the non-adjacent replies which fall within the third predetermined altitude ranges compared to the reply which is not one of the non-adjacent replies are less than the predetermined number of bits.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
85 words
A method according to claim 5, further comprising the step of: selecting an initial altitude for a track allowed to be initialized by choosing either the altitude of the most recent reply of the selected replies having high confidence binary or coded altitude data or the altitude of the most recent reply of a comparison of adjacent or non-adjacent replies which resulted in the track being allowed to be initialized if the binary or coded altitude data for all the replies are of low confidence.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US5081457A
Cited
US5107268A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1997-05-30 | 1997-11-29 | 1998-05-31 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2001-05-30 | 2001-11-29 | 2002-05-31 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2005-05-30 | 2005-11-29 | 2006-05-31 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |