US5307272A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Minefield reconnaissance and detector system
Assignee: United States Department of Energy
•
Filing: 1991-08-19
•
Granted: 1994-04-26
•
Expires: 2011-08-19
Abstract
Abstract A multi-sensor system (10) for detecting the presence of objects on the surface of the ground or buried just under the surface, such as anti-personnel or anti-tank mines or the like. A remote sensor platform (12) has a plurality of metal detector sensors (22) and a plurality of short pulse radar sensors (24). The remote sensor platform (12) is remotely controlled from a processing and control unit (14) and signals from the remote sensor platform (12) are sent to the processing and control unit (14) where they are individually evaluated in separate data analysis subprocess steps (34, 36) to obtain a probability "score" for each of the pluralities of sensors (22, 24). These probability scores are combined in a fusion subprocess step (38) by comparing score sets to a probability table (130) which is derived based upon the historical incidence of object present conditions given that score set. A decision making rule is applied to provide an output which is optionally provided to a marker subprocess (40) for controlling a marker device (76) to mark the location of found objects.
Inventors
- 👤 Millard T. Butler
- 👤 Steven P. Cave
- 👤 James D. Creager
- 👤 Charles M. Johnson
- 👤 John B. Mathes
- 👤 Kirk J. Smith
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-02 05:07
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01V; G01V3/00; G01V3/15; F; F41; F41H; F41H11/00; F41H11/12; G01V3/38
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 16
Claim 1
Independent Claim
202 words
A method for determining the presence of objects on or under the surface of the ground, comprising the steps of: a. obtaining a plurality of response signals from a plurality of sensor devices; b. digitizing each of the response signals such that the response signals can be stored in a digital computer and further such that calculations can be performed using the response signals as data within the digital computer; c. analyzing each of the response signals to detect anomalous signal characteristics, if present in the response signal, and assigning a score to each of the response signals, which score is proportional to an estimated probability that any such anomalous signal characteristic present in the response signal is indicative of the presence of an anomalous object; d. combining the scores into score sets and comparing the score sets with a known outcome given historical incidence of identical score sets; e. repeating steps a. through e. incrementally as the sensor devices are moved over the surface of the ground; and f. applying a decision rule to produce a decision based upon historical data and a determination of the relative cost of a false negative decision versus the cost of a false positive decision.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
202 words
A method for determining the presence of objects on or under the surface of the ground, comprising the steps of: a. obtaining a plurality of response signals from a plurality of sensor devices; b. digitizing each of the response signals such that the response signals can be stored in a digital computer and further such that calculations can be performed using the response signals as data within the digital computer; c. analyzing each of the response signals to detect anomalous signal characteristics, if present in the response signal, and assigning a score to each of the response signals, which score is proportional to an estimated probability that any such anomalous signal characteristic present in the response signal is indicative of the presence of an anomalous object; d. combining the scores into score sets and comparing the score sets with a known outcome given historical incidence of identical score sets; e. repeating steps a. through e. incrementally as the sensor devices are moved over the surface of the ground; and f. applying a decision rule to produce a decision based upon historical data and a determination of the relative cost of a false negative decision versus the cost of a false positive decision.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 1, wherein: a marker device is caused to mark those locations on the surface of the ground where said response signals result in a decision that an object is present.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 1, wherein: the plurality of sensor devices includes a plurality of metal detector sensors and further includes a plurality of short pulse radar sensors.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
61 words
The method of claim 3, wherein: said metal detector sensors and said short pulse radar sensors are arranged with each one of said metal detector sensors paired with one of said short pulse radar sensors; and the scores sets are pairs of scores obtained from one of said metal detector sensors and the corresponding one of said short pulse radar sensors.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
172 words
A mine detection device for detecting the presence of land mines and similar objects, comprising: a self propelled mobile platform for propelling, under remote control, a plurality of sensor devices over the surface of the ground; a control unit from which the mobile platform is remotely steered and controlled and to which a plurality of signals from said sensor devices are provided; and signal conducting means for conducting signals between said mobile platform and said control unit, wherein; said plurality of sensor devices is arranged in a plurality of sensor arrays with each of said sensor arrays having therein a like number of said sensors, each of said sensor arrays being a linear array with said linear array positioned perpendicular to a direction of travel of the mobile platform; and each of said signals from each of said sensors is separately analyzed to determine if it includes an aberration indicative of a mine and a score is established for each of said signals to indicate the probability of a mine present condition.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
172 words
A mine detection device for detecting the presence of land mines and similar objects, comprising: a self propelled mobile platform for propelling, under remote control, a plurality of sensor devices over the surface of the ground; a control unit from which the mobile platform is remotely steered and controlled and to which a plurality of signals from said sensor devices are provided; and signal conducting means for conducting signals between said mobile platform and said control unit, wherein; said plurality of sensor devices is arranged in a plurality of sensor arrays with each of said sensor arrays having therein a like number of said sensors, each of said sensor arrays being a linear array with said linear array positioned perpendicular to a direction of travel of the mobile platform; and each of said signals from each of said sensors is separately analyzed to determine if it includes an aberration indicative of a mine and a score is established for each of said signals to indicate the probability of a mine present condition.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
77 words
The mine detector of claim 5, wherein: said plurality of sensor devices includes at least one metal detector, and each of a series of said signals from said metal detector is analyzed in steps including; a. digitizing said signal; b. examining at least a portion of said signal to determine the slope of that portion of said signal; and c. producing a probability figure indicative of the likelihood that such slope indicates the presence of a mine.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
95 words
The mine detector of claim 5, wherein: said plurality of sensor devices includes at least one short pulse radar sensor, and each of a series of said signals from said short pulse radar sensor is analyzed in steps including; a. digitizing said signal; b. determining the location of a ground return portion of the signal; c. establishing a sample window in fixed relationship to said ground return portion of said signal; and d. determining the energy represented by that portion of said signal which lies within said sample window to produce a calculated waveform energy.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
48 words
The mine detector of claim 7, wherein: said score for each of said radar sensor signals is established to be proportional to a ratio of said calculated waveform energy as compared to a nominal waveform energy, said nominal waveform energy being an average of prior calculated waveform energies.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
192 words
The mine detector of claim 5, wherein: said plurality of sensor devices includes at least one short pulse radar sensor, and each of a series of said signals from said short pulse radar sensor is analyzed in steps including; a. digitizing each of a series of said signals; b. determining the location of a ground return portion of each of said series of signals; c. establishing an object search window in fixed relationship to said ground return portion of each of said signals; d. locating a waveform maximum point within said object search window; e. establishing a feature extraction window in relation to said waveform maximum point; f. determining an average high amplitude reduction of said maximum point as compared to at least some of said signals preceding and succeeding a signal presently under analysis; g. locating a waveform minimum point within said object search window; h. determining an average low amplitude reduction of said minimum point as compared to at least some of said signals preceding and succeeding said signal presently under analysis; and i. determining a differential sum of said average high amplitude reduction and said average low amplitude reduction.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
63 words
The mine detector of claim 5, wherein: said scores from at least some of said sensor devices are combined to produce a score set, and said score sets are compared to a data table, said data table being a correlation of each possible score set to the proportional incidence of a mine present condition existing, given the corresponding one of said score sets.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
63 words
The mine detector of claim 10, wherein: said data table is selected from a plurality of data tables with each of said data tables of said plurality of data tables having been derived from data gathered under a defined set of conditions such that each of said data tables is specifically suited for specific conditions under which the mine detector might be used.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
20 words
The mine detector of claim 10, wherein: a decision is made by application of an adaption of Bayes Decision Rule.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
61 words
The mine detector of claim 10, wherein: a decision is made to declare a mine present condition or, alternatively, to declare a mine not present condition based upon information derived from said data table and a relative assessment of a cost of incorrectly declaring said mine present condition as compared to a cost of incorrectly declaring said mine not present condition.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
26 words
The mine detector of claim 13, wherein: a marker device is activated to mark a location of a mine when said mine present condition is declared.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1997-04-25 | 1997-10-25 | 1998-04-26 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2001-04-25 | 2001-10-25 | 2002-04-26 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2005-04-25 | 2005-10-25 | 2006-04-26 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |