US5285379A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Sliding mode control system
Assignee: Danfoss Power Solutions II Ltd
•
Filing: 1991-12-03
•
Granted: 1994-02-08
•
Expires: 2011-12-03
Abstract
Abstract Control method and apparatus for a moveable control member with n>3 observed states. The apparatus incorporates a sliding mode control system operable to maintain the state point of the moveable member on a predetermined non-linear hyperplane having n-1 dimensions. The hyperplane is such that, if the state point is maintained thereon, the maximum rate of change of the highest order observed state does not exceed that of which the control apparatus is capable. The sliding mode control system include sa digital processor operable to reference n-1 low order observed states to the predetermined hyperplane to establish a desired value of the highest order observed state. The control system compares such desired value with the observed highest order state, and implements the control action necessary to maintain the state point on the predetermined hyperplane.
Inventors
- 👤 Jonathan B. Gamble
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-31 09:28
CPC Classifications
G; G05; G05B; G05B11/00; G05B13/00; G05B13/02; G05B13/0205; G05B13/0255
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 24
Claim 1
Independent Claim
154 words
Control apparatus for a moveable control member with n≧3 observed states, characterised in that the apparatus incorporates a sliding mode control system, operable to maintain the state point of the moveable member on a predetermined non-linear hyperplane having n-1 dimensions, the hyperplane being such that if the state point is maintained thereon, the maximum rate of change of the highest order observed state does not exceed that of which the control apparatus is capable, in that the sliding mode control system comprises digital processor means operable to reference n-1 low order observed states to the predetermined hyperplane to establish a desired value of the highest order observed state, and in that the control system further comprises comparator means operable to compare said desired value with the observed highest order state, and means responsive to the comparator means and operable to implement the control action necessary to maintain the state point on the predetermined hyperplane.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
154 words
Control apparatus for a moveable control member with n≧3 observed states, characterised in that the apparatus incorporates a sliding mode control system, operable to maintain the state point of the moveable member on a predetermined non-linear hyperplane having n-1 dimensions, the hyperplane being such that if the state point is maintained thereon, the maximum rate of change of the highest order observed state does not exceed that of which the control apparatus is capable, in that the sliding mode control system comprises digital processor means operable to reference n-1 low order observed states to the predetermined hyperplane to establish a desired value of the highest order observed state, and in that the control system further comprises comparator means operable to compare said desired value with the observed highest order state, and means responsive to the comparator means and operable to implement the control action necessary to maintain the state point on the predetermined hyperplane.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
26 words
Apparatus according to claim 1, characterised in that the hyperplane is such that maximum rate of change of the highest order observed state is substantially constant.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
23 words
Apparatus according to claim 1, characterised in that the hyperplane is such that the magnitude of the highest order observed state is limited.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
24 words
Apparatus according to claim 1, characterised in that the magnitude one or more of the low order observed states, except the lowest, is limited.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
24 words
Apparatus according to claim 1, characterised in that the hyperplane is defined in the form of a look-up table loaded into the digital processor.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
33 words
Apparatus according to claim 1, characterised in that one of the n-1 low order observed states is the error between an externally applied input signal and the output of the moveable control member.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
48 words
Apparatus according to claim 1, characterised in that the n-1 low order observed states are referenced to the hyperplane at a first frequency, and the desired highest order state is compared with the observed highest order state of a second frequency which is greater than the first frequency.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
22 words
Apparatus according to claim 7, characterised in that the highest order derivative is observed using a dual rate algorithm in the processor.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
20 words
Apparatus according to claim 1, characterised in that the highest order state is referenced to the hyperplane using analogue means.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
32 words
Apparatus according to claim 1, characterised in that the low order observed states of the moveable control member are referenced to the hyperplane using digital computational means in the digital processor means.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
16 words
Apparatus according to claim 1, characterised in that the digital processor means comprises digital microprocessor means.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
48 words
Apparatus according to claim 1, characterized in that the hyperplane is defined in accordance with the equation: ##EQU22## where: ε=error between actual and desired spool positions, α=desired rate of change of spool acceleration, x=actual (measured) velocity of the valve spool, and x=actual (measured acceleration of the value spool.
Claim 14
Independent Claim
152 words
A method of controlling a moveable control member, characterised in that it comprises the steps of: i) providing a sliding mode control system for a moveable control member having n≧3 observed states, the sliding mode control system being operable to maintain the state point of the moveable member on a predetermined non-linear hyperplane have n-1 dimensions, ii) defining the hyperplane such that if the state point is maintained thereon, the maximum rate of change of the highest order observed state does not exceed that of which the control apparatus is capable, iii) referencing n-1 low order observed states of the moveable control member to the predetermined hyperplane to establish a desired value of the highest order observed state, iv) comparing the desired value with the observed highest order state, and v) using the result of said comparison to implement the control action necessary to maintain the state point on the predetermined hyperplane.
Claim 15
Independent Claim
152 words
A method of controlling a moveable control member, characterised in that it comprises the steps of: i) providing a sliding mode control system for a moveable control member having n≧3 observed states, the sliding mode control system being operable to maintain the state point of the moveable member on a predetermined non-linear hyperplane have n-1 dimensions, ii) defining the hyperplane such that if the state point is maintained thereon, the maximum rate of change of the highest order observed state does not exceed that of which the control apparatus is capable, iii) referencing n-1 low order observed states of the moveable control member to the predetermined hyperplane to establish a desired value of the highest order observed state, iv) comparing the desired value with the observed highest order state, and v) using the result of said comparison to implement the control action necessary to maintain the state point on the predetermined hyperplane.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
33 words
A method according to claim 13, characterised in that the step of defining the hyperplane involves arranging for the maximum rate of change of the highest order observed state to be substantially constant.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
29 words
A method according to claim 13, characterised in that the step of defining the hyperplane involves arranging for the magnitude of the highest order observed state to be limited.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
35 words
A method according to claim 13, characterised in that step of defining the hyperplane involves arranging for the magnitude of one or more of the low order observed states, except the lowest, to be limited.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
20 words
A method according to claim 13, characterized in that the hyperplane is defined in the form of a look-up table.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
117 words
A method according to claim 17, characterized in that the step of establishing the desired value of the highest order observed state is executed in a program within the digital processor, the programs executing the following steps: a) reading the position demand, actual position and velocity of the moveable member; b) calculating the position error (demand minus actual); c) finding the close values of error (one on either side) for which the look-up table gives acceleration values; d) doing the same for the velocity; e) taking the four acceleration values found in (c) and (d) and estimating acceleration at the actual values of error and velocity using bilinear interpolation; and f) outputting this desired value of acceleration.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
36 words
A method according to claim 13, characterised in that the step of observing the highest order derivative is implemented using a dual rate algorithm in digital processing means forming part of the sliding mode control system.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
22 words
A method according to claim 13, characterised in that the step of observing the highest order derivative is implemented using analogue means.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
27 words
A method according to claim 13, characterised in that the step of referencing the low order states to the hyperplane is implemented digitally by digital processor means.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
49 words
A method according to claim 13, characterized in that the hyperplane is defined in accordance with the equation: ##EQU23## wherein: ε=error between actual and desired spool positions, α=desired rate of change of spool acceleration, x=actual (measured) velocity of the valve spool, and x=actual (measured) acceleration of the valve spool.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1997-02-07 | 1997-08-09 | 1998-02-08 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2001-02-07 | 2001-08-09 | 2002-02-08 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2005-02-07 | 2005-08-09 | 2006-02-08 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |