US5267329A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Process for automatically detecting and locating a target from a plurality of two dimensional images
Assignee: Kaman Aerospace Corp
•
Filing: 1990-08-10
•
Granted: 1993-11-30
•
Expires: 2010-08-10
Abstract
Abstract A novel data processing technique is provided for detecting and locating a target from a plurality of two-dimensional images generated by an imaging sensor such as an imaging lidar system. The present invention processes this series of two dimensional images (made with one or more imaging detectors) in an optimal statistical fashion to reliably detect and locate targets. This invention is a process by which the images are mathematically modified to reduce the deleterious effects of noise and thereby provide the highest possible probability of detection while simultaneously maintaining a very low probability of false alarm. The data processing technique described herein also provides an estimate of the reliability of the detection, the target location and an output image to be displayed for visual confirmation and perhaps classification by the operator. The method of the present invention includes some or all of the following steps: noise reduction, spatial filtering, noise parameter extraction, asymmetric threshold detection, contrast stretching, localization, recognition, range or depth determination and subimage mosaic generation. The present invention is particularly well suited for processing two dimensional images of underwater targets generated by an imaging sensor located on an airborne platform whereby the underwater target is precisely and accurately detected, located and identified.
Inventors
- 👤 Bobby L. Ulich
- 👤 John W. Montgomery
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-24 19:58
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06T; G06T7/00; G06T7/70; G06V; G06V10/00; G06V10/20; G06V10/255
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 21
Claim 1
Independent Claim
239 words
A method for processing a plurality of two dimensional camera images of a target, the images being comprises of a plurality of pixels with each pixel having a particular pixel intensity and all of the images further having been generated by an active imaging sensor, the active imaging sensor comprising at least one pulsed light transmitter and at least one range gated camera receiver, the method comprising the steps of: (1) digitizing the camera images; (2) calculating the mean and the standard deviation about the mean of the camera images; and (3) determining whether a target was detected using threshold detection analysis based upon the calculated mean and standard deviation about the mean; wherein step (3) further comprises the steps of: (4) determining if each pixels intensity in each image is lower than a selected intensity value defining a potential target shadow or higher than a selected intensity value defining a potential target reflection; (5) determining if the potential target shadow is an actual target or due to noise by comparing said pixel intensity to a range of first preselected threshold values in the event that each pixel intensity in each image defines a target shadow; and (6) determining if the potential target reflection is an actual target or due to noise by comparing said pixel intensity to a range of second preselected threshold values in the event that each pixel intensity in each image defines a target reflection.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
239 words
A method for processing a plurality of two dimensional camera images of a target, the images being comprises of a plurality of pixels with each pixel having a particular pixel intensity and all of the images further having been generated by an active imaging sensor, the active imaging sensor comprising at least one pulsed light transmitter and at least one range gated camera receiver, the method comprising the steps of: (1) digitizing the camera images; (2) calculating the mean and the standard deviation about the mean of the camera images; and (3) determining whether a target was detected using threshold detection analysis based upon the calculated mean and standard deviation about the mean; wherein step (3) further comprises the steps of: (4) determining if each pixels intensity in each image is lower than a selected intensity value defining a potential target shadow or higher than a selected intensity value defining a potential target reflection; (5) determining if the potential target shadow is an actual target or due to noise by comparing said pixel intensity to a range of first preselected threshold values in the event that each pixel intensity in each image defines a target shadow; and (6) determining if the potential target reflection is an actual target or due to noise by comparing said pixel intensity to a range of second preselected threshold values in the event that each pixel intensity in each image defines a target reflection.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
46 words
The method of claim 1 including: calculating the average and peak intensities for each camera image; and adjusting the gain of the at least one camera subsequent to calculating the average and peak intensities wherein optimum intrascene dynamic range is achieved in the next camera exposure.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method of claim 1 including the step of: reducing the noise level of the camera images.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 3 wherein said noise reduction step further comprises: coregistering and averaging all images which are of the same scene wherein background noise level is reduced.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method of claim 1 including the step of: spatially filtering the camera images.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 5 wherein said spatial filtering step further comprises: filtering the camera images to enhance any target signature and suppress undesired high and low spatial frequencies.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 6 wherein said filtering step further comprises: bandpass spatial filtering wherein each pixel intensity value is replaced with the output of a two dimensional spatial convolution calculation.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 1 wherein: said first preselected threshold values are equal to said second preselected threshold values, but have opposing signs defining symmetric values.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 1 wherein: said first preselected threshold values are not equal to said second preselected threshold values defining asymmetric values.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 1 including the step of: determining the probability of false alarms as a function of the first and second preselected threshold values and as a function of the probability density function of the noise.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 1 wherein a target has been detected in the camera images and including the steps of: stretching in contrast a portion of the image near the target defining a subimage.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 1 wherein a target has been detected in the camera images and including the step of: determining the X and Y coordinates of the target.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 12 wherein: said X and Y coordinates are determined using either the peak signal pixel location or an intensity centroid calculation.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
48 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the imaging sensor is located on an airborne platform having onboard navigational instruments and including the step of: determining absolute latitude and longitude of the target using onboard navigational instruments and a correction for the target location relative to the airborne platform.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 12 including the step of: correlating the target location with previous target detections in the same location to increase probability of detection.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 1 wherein a target has been detected in the camera images and including the step of: determining target depth zone.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
53 words
The method of claim 16 wherein the step of determining target depth zone comprises: comparing images from at least two adjacent range gates and determining which range gate target is present as a function of whether the target is a shadow or reflection or not present in each of the adjacent range gates.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 1 wherein a target has been detected in the camera images and including the step of: combining subimages of the target into a composite mosaic.
Claim 20
Independent Claim
129 words
A method for processing a plurality of two dimensional camera images of a target, all of the images having been generated by an active imaging sensor comprised of at least one pulsed light transmitter and at least one range gated camera receiver and being located on an airborne platform having onboard navigational instruments, comprising the steps of: (1) digitizing the camera images; (2) analyzing the digitized camera images to determine whether a target was detected; and (3) determining target depth zone wherein the step of determining target depth zone comprises; comparing images from at least two adjacent range gates and determining which range gate target is present as a function of whether the target is a shadow or reflection or not present in each of the adjacent range gates.
Claim 21
Independent Claim
129 words
A method for processing a plurality of two dimensional camera images of a target, all of the images having been generated by an active imaging sensor comprised of at least one pulsed light transmitter and at least one range gated camera receiver and being located on an airborne platform having onboard navigational instruments, comprising the steps of: (1) digitizing the camera images; (2) analyzing the digitized camera images to determine whether a target was detected; and (3) determining target depth zone wherein the step of determining target depth zone comprises; comparing images from at least two adjacent range gates and determining which range gate target is present as a function of whether the target is a shadow or reflection or not present in each of the adjacent range gates.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3947833A
Cited
US4497065A
Cited
US4550435A
Cited
US4739401A
Cited
US4736439A
Cited
US4970660A
Cited
US4845500A
Cited
US4862257A
Cited
US4920412A
Cited
US4964721A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1996-11-29 | 1997-05-31 | 1997-11-30 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2000-11-29 | 2001-05-31 | 2001-11-30 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2004-11-29 | 2005-05-31 | 2005-11-30 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |