US5266790A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Focusing technique suitable for use with an unpatterned specular substrate
Assignee: Ultratech Inc
•
Filing: 1992-12-21
•
Granted: 1993-11-30
•
Expires: 2012-12-21
Abstract
Abstract A microlithographic stepper, employing a Half-Field Dyson projection optical system, achieves focusing of an image of a first-layer reticle pattern on a completely unpatterned reflective wafer surface by including a repetitive diffraction pattern on the reticle which has a configuration in which a particular ordinal diffraction order is normally missing. In response to being simultaneously illuminated with each of two incident monochromatic beams of light, diffraction orders generated by the repetitive diffraction pattern are imaged on the reflective wafer surface and then reflected back to and reimaged on the repetitive diffraction pattern on the reticle. Diffraction orders generated on the first encounter with the repetitive diffraction pattern generate light in the originally missing ordinal diffraction order on the second encounter. If more than one diffraction order from the first encounter contribute toward generating this missing-order light, then the light intensity of the originally missing order will depend on focus position of the wafer. Best focus will generate either maximum or minimum light intensity of the originally missing order. Using a single wavelength, a single repetitive diffraction pattern period, and a single incidence angle, provides a limited unambiguous focus range. However, by using a second wavelength, a second repetitive diffraction pattern period, or a second incidence angle, the unambiguous focus range is substantially extended. Each of these separate incident illuminating beams gives rise to its own set of reflected diffraction-order light. Thus, each of the two monochromatic beams of light gives rise to reflected diffraction-order light from each of two sets that occupy the position of the normally-missing particular ordinal diffraction order. Detection of interference maxima and minima in the intensity of this light, derived either by moving the wafer surface through in-focus or by electro-optic means responsive to this light being orthogonally polarized, permits best focus to be achieved.
Inventors
- 👤 David A. Markle
- 👤 Gerald J. Alonzo
- 👤 Hwan J. Jeong
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-31 13:51
CPC Classifications
G; G03; G03F; G03F7/00; G03F7/70; G03F7/70216; G03F7/70225; G02; G02B; G02B7/00; G02B7/28; G03F9/00; G03F9/70; G03F9/7003; G03F9/7023; G03F9/7026; G03F9/7049
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 43
Claim 1
Independent Claim
267 words
In a method for focusing a projection optical system on a reflective surface; said method comprising the steps of: (a) illuminating at least one repetitive diffraction pattern located in the object plane of said projection optical system with a beam of radiation including a given wavelength to derive thereby a plurality of different diffraction orders which are imaged by said projection optical system onto said reflective surface, said repetitive diffraction pattern having a certain configuration that is intended to result in substantially all energy to be missing from a particular one of said plurality of diffraction orders; and (b) employing said projection optical system to reimage the energy of each of at least two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders reflected from said reflective surface back onto said repetitive diffraction pattern in said object plane to derive thereby diffracted energy from each of said reimaged two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders located in the position normally occupied by said particular missing one of said plurality of diffraction orders; whereby interference between the diffracted radiation of said given wavelength of said reimaged two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders located in the position normally occupied by said particular missing one of said plurality of diffraction orders causes the radiation intensity thereof to vary sinusoidally in accordance with the amount of focus error of said projection optical system in focusing on said reflective surface, and a maxima or a minima in the radiation intensity of said reimaged two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders is indicative of the quantitative value of said focus error.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
267 words
In a method for focusing a projection optical system on a reflective surface; said method comprising the steps of: (a) illuminating at least one repetitive diffraction pattern located in the object plane of said projection optical system with a beam of radiation including a given wavelength to derive thereby a plurality of different diffraction orders which are imaged by said projection optical system onto said reflective surface, said repetitive diffraction pattern having a certain configuration that is intended to result in substantially all energy to be missing from a particular one of said plurality of diffraction orders; and (b) employing said projection optical system to reimage the energy of each of at least two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders reflected from said reflective surface back onto said repetitive diffraction pattern in said object plane to derive thereby diffracted energy from each of said reimaged two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders located in the position normally occupied by said particular missing one of said plurality of diffraction orders; whereby interference between the diffracted radiation of said given wavelength of said reimaged two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders located in the position normally occupied by said particular missing one of said plurality of diffraction orders causes the radiation intensity thereof to vary sinusoidally in accordance with the amount of focus error of said projection optical system in focusing on said reflective surface, and a maxima or a minima in the radiation intensity of said reimaged two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders is indicative of the quantitative value of said focus error.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
72 words
The method defined in claim 1, further including the step of: (c) varying the relative positions of said repetitive diffraction pattern and said reflective surface with respect to one another and in response to said variation in relative positions sensing the radiation intensity of said reimaged two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders; whereby a sensed maxima or a minima in said radiation intensity is indicative of a zero focus error.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
136 words
The method defined in claim 1, wherein: step (a) comprises the steps of (c) illuminating said one repetitive diffraction pattern with a beam of plane-polarized radiation including said given wavelength; and (d) spatially rotating the plane of polarization of one of said two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders by substantially 90° with respect to the other to provide orthogonal planes of polarization thereof, thereby permitting them to be treated separately; and step (b) comprises the steps of (e) electro-optically phase shifting by a variable amount diffracted energy from one of said reimaged two given ones of said imaged orthogonally-polarized diffraction orders with respect to the other; and (f) converting said phase-shifted reimaged orthogonally-polarized diffraction orders to two diffraction orders that have a common plane of polarization, thereby permitting them to interfere with one another.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
111 words
The method defined in claim 3, wherein: step (e) comprises electro-optically phase shifting said diffracted energy from one of said reimaged two given ones of said imaged orthogonally-polarized diffraction orders with respect to the other in accordance with the value of an applied variable signal; and step (f) further includes sensing the radiation intensity of said interfering two diffraction orders that have a common plane of polarization in response to a change in the value of said applied variable signal; whereby the value of said applied variable signal at which a maxima or a minima in said radiation intensity is sensed is indicative of the quantitative value of said focus error.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
43 words
The method defined in claim 1, wherein: step (f) comprises converting said phase-shifted reimaged orthogonally-polarized diffraction orders to two diffraction orders that have a common plane of polarization oriented at substantially 45° with respect to each of said phase-shifted reimaged orthogonally-polarized diffraction orders.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
262 words
The focusing method defined in claim 1, wherein: said repetitive diffraction pattern comprises at least one set of periodically-spaced elements having a certain configuration; step (a) comprises simultaneously illuminating a set of said repetitive diffraction patterns with a plurality of n radiation beams having individually-assigned wavelengths λ 1 . . . λ n and individually-assigned incident angles φ 1 . . . φ n , wherein the individually-assigned wavelength of each of said plurality of n radiation beams differs in value from one another, and/or the individually-assigned incident angle of each of said plurality of n radiation beams differs in value from one another, and/or, in the case in which said repetitive diffraction pattern comprises more than one set, the period of each of said periodically-spaced elements of each of said respective sets is different from one another; and step (b) comprises employing said projection optical system to reimage the radiation of each of at least two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders of each of said plurality of n radiation beams reflected from said reflective surface back onto said repetitive diffraction pattern to derive thereby diffracted radiation from each of said reimaged two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders said plurality of diffraction orders of each of said plurality of n said plurality of diffraction orders of each of said plurality of n radiation beams; whereby a simultaneous maxima or a minima in the radiation intensity of each of said reimaged two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders is indicative of the quantitative value of said focus error.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
269 words
In a focusing system for focusing a projection optical system on a reflective surface; said focusing system comprising: first means for illuminating at least one repetitive diffraction pattern located in the object plane of said projection optical system with a radiation beam including a given wavelength to derive thereby a plurality of different diffraction orders which are imaged by said projection optical system onto said reflective surface, said repetitive diffraction pattern having a certain configuration that is intended to result in substantially all radiation to be missing from a particular one of said plurality of diffraction orders; and second means for employing said projection optical system to reimage the radiation of each of at least two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders reflected from said reflective surface back onto said repetitive diffraction pattern in said object plane to derive thereby diffracted radiation from each of said reimaged two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders located in the position normally occupied by said particular missing one of said plurality of diffraction orders; whereby interference between the diffracted radiation of said given wavelength of said reimaged two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders located in the position normally occupied by said particular missing one of said plurality of diffraction orders causes the radiation intensity thereof to vary sinusoidally in accordance with the amount of focus error of said projection optical system in focusing on said reflective surface, and a maxima or a minima in the radiation intensity of said reimaged two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders is indicative of the quantitative value of said focus error.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
269 words
In a focusing system for focusing a projection optical system on a reflective surface; said focusing system comprising: first means for illuminating at least one repetitive diffraction pattern located in the object plane of said projection optical system with a radiation beam including a given wavelength to derive thereby a plurality of different diffraction orders which are imaged by said projection optical system onto said reflective surface, said repetitive diffraction pattern having a certain configuration that is intended to result in substantially all radiation to be missing from a particular one of said plurality of diffraction orders; and second means for employing said projection optical system to reimage the radiation of each of at least two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders reflected from said reflective surface back onto said repetitive diffraction pattern in said object plane to derive thereby diffracted radiation from each of said reimaged two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders located in the position normally occupied by said particular missing one of said plurality of diffraction orders; whereby interference between the diffracted radiation of said given wavelength of said reimaged two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders located in the position normally occupied by said particular missing one of said plurality of diffraction orders causes the radiation intensity thereof to vary sinusoidally in accordance with the amount of focus error of said projection optical system in focusing on said reflective surface, and a maxima or a minima in the radiation intensity of said reimaged two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders is indicative of the quantitative value of said focus error.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
72 words
The focusing system defined in claim 7, further comprising: third means for varying the relative positions of said repetitive diffraction pattern and said reflective surface with respect to one another and in response to said variation in relative positions sensing the radiation intensity of said reimaged two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders; whereby a sensed maxima or a minima in said radiation intensity is indicative of a zero focus error.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
137 words
The focusing system defined in claim 7, wherein: said first means comprises means for illuminating said one repetitive diffraction pattern with a beam of plane-polarized radiation including said given wavelength; and means for spatially rotating the plane of polarization of one of said two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders by substantially 90° with respect to the other to provide orthogonal planes of polarization thereof, thereby permitting them to be treated separately; and said second means comprises means for electro-optically phase shifting by a variable amount diffracted energy from one of said reimaged two given ones of said imaged orthogonally-polarized diffraction orders with respect to the other; and means for converting said phase-shifted reimaged orthogonally-polarized diffraction orders to two diffraction orders that have a common plane of polarization, thereby permitting them to interfere with one another.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
62 words
The focusing system defined in claim 9, wherein: means for converting said phase-shifted reimaged orthogonally-polarized diffraction orders to two diffraction orders that have a common plane of polarization convert said phase-shifted reimaged orthogonally-polarized diffraction orders to two diffraction orders that have a common plane of polarization oriented at substantially 45° with respect to each of of said phase-shifted reimaged orthogonally-polarized diffraction orders.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
32 words
The focusing system defined in claim 9, wherein: said spatially-rotating means includes a half-wave plate disposed in the path of only one of said two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
109 words
The focusing system defined in claim 9, wherein: said means for electro-optically phase shifting includes means that electro-optically phase shifts said diffracted energy from one of said reimaged two given ones of said imaged orthogonally-polarized diffraction orders with respect to the other in accordance with the value of an applied variable signal; and said focusing system further comprises detector means for sensing the radiation intensity of said interfering two diffraction orders that have a common plane of polarization; whereby the value of said applied variable signal at which a maxima or a minima in said radiation intensity is sensed is indicative of the quantitative value of said focus error.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
31 words
The focusing system defined in claim 12, wherein: said means that electro-optically phase shifts said diffracted energy in accordance with the value of an applied variable signal comprises a Pockels cell.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
19 words
The focusing system defined in claim 12, wherein: said converting means comprises a quarter-wave plate and a plane polarizer.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
269 words
The focusing system defined in claim 7, wherein: said repetitive diffraction pattern comprises at least one set of periodically-spaced elements having a certain configuration; said first means comprises third means for simultaneously illuminating a set of said repetitive diffraction pattern with a plurality of n radiation beams having individually-assigned wavelengths λ 1 . . . λ n and individually-assigned incident angles φ 1 . . . φ n , wherein the individually-assigned wavelength of each of said plurality of n radiation beams differs in value from one another, and/or the individually-assigned incident angle of each of said plurality of n radiation beams differs in value from one another, and/or, in the case in which said repetitive diffraction pattern comprises more than one set, the period of each of said periodically-spaced elements of each of said respective sets is different from one another; and said second means comprises fourth means employing said projection optical system to reimage the radiation of each of at least two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders of each of said plurality of n radiation beams reflected from said reflective surface back onto said repetitive diffraction pattern to derive thereby diffracted radiation from each of said reimaged two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders located in the position normally occupied by said particular missing one of said plurality of diffraction orders of each of said plurality of n radiation beams; whereby a simultaneous maxima or a minima in the radiation intensity of each of said reimaged two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders is indicative of the quantitative value of said focus error.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
80 words
The focusing system defined in claim 7 for use with a microlithographic stepper that includes said projection optical system and a wafer-supporting movable stepper stage in the vicinity of the focus of said projection optical system for moving a wafer through said focus; wherein: said reflective surface comprises the surface of said wafer; and said repetitive diffraction pattern is included in a given reticle pattern disposed on a reticle situated substantially in said object plane of said projection optical system.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
19 words
The focusing system defined in claim 16, wherein: said given reticle pattern comprises a reflective pattern on said reticle.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
13 words
The focusing system defined in claim 16, wherein: said radiation is light radiation.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
17 words
The focusing system defined in claim 16, wherein: said microlithographic stepper is a Half-Field Dyson microlithographic stepper.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
75 words
The focusing system defined in claim 16, further comprising: detector means, including an intensity detector positioned to detect the intensity of said radiation of said imaged diffraction orders that are located in the position normally occupied by said particular missing one of said plurality of diffraction orders, for deriving an output used to control the positioning of said movable stepper stage in response to said intensity of said radiation reaching a maxima or a minima.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
269 words
The focusing system defined in claim 16, wherein: said repetitive diffraction pattern comprises at least one set of periodically-spaced elements having a certain configuration; said first means comprises third means for simultaneously illuminating a set of said repetitive diffraction pattern with a plurality of n radiation beams having individually-assigned wavelengths λ 1 . . . λ n and individually-assigned incident angles φ 1 . . . φ n , wherein the individually-assigned wavelength of each of said plurality of n radiation beams differs in value from one another, and/or the individually-assigned incident angle of each of said plurality of n radiation beams differs in value from one another, and/or, in the case in which said repetitive diffraction pattern comprises more than one set, the period of each of said periodically-spaced elements of each of said respective sets is different from one another; and said second means comprises fourth means employing said projection optical system to reimage the radiation of each of at least two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders of each of said plurality of n radiation beams reflected from said reflective surface back onto said repetitive diffraction pattern to derive thereby diffracted radiation from each of said reimaged two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders located in the position normally occupied by said particular missing one of said plurality of diffraction orders of each of said plurality of n radiation beams; whereby a simultaneous maxima or a minima in the radiation intensity of each of said reimaged two given ones of said imaged diffraction orders is indicative of the quantitative value of said focus error.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
14 words
The focusing system defined in claim 21, wherein: the value of n is 2.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
93 words
The focusing system defined in claim 21, further comprising: detector means, including a separate-intensity detector positioned to detect the intensity of said radiation of said imaged diffraction orders that are located in the position normally occupied by said particular missing one of said plurality of diffraction orders of each of said plurality of n radiation beams, for deriving an output used to control the positioning of said movable stepper stage in response to said intensity of said radiation detected by all of said separate-intensity detectors substantially simultaneously reaching a maxima or a minima.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
24 words
The focusing system defined in claim 7, wherein: said repetitive diffraction pattern comprises at least one set of periodically-spaced elements having a certain configuration.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
83 words
The focusing system defined in claim 24, wherein: said one set of periodically-spaced reflective elements have a certain configuration that comprises a linear grating consisting of a single group of equidistant substantially parallel elements, in which the width of each element of said single group of said linear grating is substantially a and the period of said single group of said linear grating is substantially P, and the ratio P/a is substantially a given integer m having a value of at least 2.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
9 words
The focusing system defined in claim 25, wherein m=2.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
90 words
The focusing system defined in claim 24, wherein: said one set of periodically-spaced elements have a certain configuration that comprises first and second separated groups of equidistant substantially parallel linear elements, in which the period of each of said first and second separated groups of said certain configuration is substantially P and the separation between said first and second separated groups of said certain configuration is substantially d, and ##EQU2## where m is a given integer and n is the ordinal value of the particular diffraction order that is missing.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
14 words
The focusing system defined in claim 27, wherein: where m=0 and n=2, whereby d=P/4.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
83 words
The focusing system defined in claim 24, wherein: said one set of periodically-spaced reflective elements have a certain two-dimensional configuration that comprises substantially square elements arranged in a checkerboard pattern, in which the size of each side of each square element of said certain two-dimensional configuration is substantially a and the period of said certain two-dimensional configuration in each of its two dimensions is substantially P, and the ratio P/a is substantially a given integer m having a value of at least 2.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
9 words
The focusing system defined in claim 29, wherein m=2.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
161 words
In a reticle including a reticle pattern disposed thereon, said reticle, in use, being situated in the object plane of microlithographic-stepper projection optical system which images said reticle pattern on a reflective surface of a wafer; the improvement in said reticle comprising: a repetitive diffraction pattern incorporated in said reticle pattern, said repetitive diffraction pattern comprising at least one set of periodically-spaced reflective elements having a certain configuration, wherein said configuration of said periodically-spaced reflective elements of each set is such that illumination of said repetitive diffraction pattern results in both the positive and negative of a particular ordinal diffraction order of each set thereof being substantially missing, and, in the case in which said repetitive diffraction pattern comprises more than one set, the value of said period is different for each of said sets; whereby said repetitive diffraction pattern can be used to focus the image of said reticle pattern substantially in the image plane of said projection optical system.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
161 words
In a reticle including a reticle pattern disposed thereon, said reticle, in use, being situated in the object plane of microlithographic-stepper projection optical system which images said reticle pattern on a reflective surface of a wafer; the improvement in said reticle comprising: a repetitive diffraction pattern incorporated in said reticle pattern, said repetitive diffraction pattern comprising at least one set of periodically-spaced reflective elements having a certain configuration, wherein said configuration of said periodically-spaced reflective elements of each set is such that illumination of said repetitive diffraction pattern results in both the positive and negative of a particular ordinal diffraction order of each set thereof being substantially missing, and, in the case in which said repetitive diffraction pattern comprises more than one set, the value of said period is different for each of said sets; whereby said repetitive diffraction pattern can be used to focus the image of said reticle pattern substantially in the image plane of said projection optical system.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
82 words
The reticle defined in claim 31, wherein: said one set of periodically-spaced reflective elements have a certain configuration that comprises a linear grating consisting of a single group of equidistant substantially parallel elements, in which the width of each element of said single group of said linear grating is substantially a and the period of said single group of said linear grating is substantially P, and the ratio P/a is substantially a given integer m having a value of at least 2.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
8 words
The reticle defined in claim 32, wherein m=2.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
99 words
The reticle defined in claim 31, wherein: said one set of periodically-spaced elements have a certain configuration that comprises first and second separated groups of equidistant substantially parallel linear elements, in which the period of each of said first and second separated groups of said substantially in the image plane of said projection optical system certain configuration is substantially P and the separation between said first and second separated groups of said certain configuration is substantially d, and ##EQU3## where m is a given integer and n is the ordinal value of the particular diffraction order that is missing.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
13 words
The reticle defined in claim 34, wherein: where m=0 and n=2, whereby d=P/4.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim
82 words
The reticle defined in claim 31, wherein: said one set of periodically-spaced reflective elements have a certain two-dimensional configuration that comprises substantially square elements arranged in a checkerboard pattern, in which the size of each side of each square element of said certain two-dimensional configuration is substantially a and the period of said certain two-dimensional configuration in each of its two dimensions is substantially P, and the ratio P/a is substantially a given integer m having a value of at least 2.
Claim 40
Dependent Claim
8 words
The reticle defined in claim 36, wherein m=2.
Claim 41
Dependent Claim
70 words
The reticle defined in claim 31, wherein: said reticle pattern disposed on said reticle incorporates a first-layer pattern disposed thereon in predetermined spaced relationship with respect to said repetitive diffraction pattern incorporated in said reticle pattern such that the subsequent patterning of the surface of said wafer with an in-focus image of said reticle pattern results in said repetitive diffraction pattern being coincident with a scribe line on said wafer.
Claim 42
Dependent Claim
15 words
The reticle defined in claim 31, wherein: said reticle pattern is a reflective reticle pattern.
Claim 43
Dependent Claim
28 words
The reticle defined in claim 31, wherein: said reticle, in use, is situated in the object plane of the projection optical system of a Half-Field Dyson microlithographic stepper.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1996-11-29 | 1997-05-31 | 1997-11-30 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2000-11-29 | 2001-05-31 | 2001-11-30 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2004-11-29 | 2005-05-31 | 2005-11-30 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |