US5265250A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Apparatus and methods for performing an application-defined operation on data as part of a system-defined operation on the data
Assignee: Nokia Bell Labs
•
Filing: 1990-03-29
•
Granted: 1993-11-23
•
Expires: 2010-03-29
Abstract
Abstract Apparatus and method for performing an application-defined operation on data as part of a system-defined operation on the data. The apparatus and method are embodied in a distributed transaction processing system in which processes running on component systems which may be heterogeneous interact according to the client-server model. In the apparatus and method, a type is associated with the data and application-defined operations which are part of certain system-defined operations are defined for each type. The system-defined operations which the application-defined operations are part of include allocation, reallocation, and deallocation of buffers and sending buffers between clients and servers using remote procedure calls. In the allocation and reallocation operations, the application-defined operation is initialization; in the deallocation operation, it is uninitialization. In buffer sending, the application-defined operations include operations done on the buffer contents before sending, routing, encoding the buffer contents into a transfer syntax, operations done on the buffer contents after sending, decoding the buffer contents from the transfer syntax after receiving, and operations done on the buffer contents after receiving. Data structures in the processes associate the data and its type and a type and its application-defined operations. Servers employ a shared bulletin board data structure to indicate the types they accept.
Inventors
- 👤 Juan M. Andrade
- 👤 Mark T. Carges
- 👤 Stephen D. Felts
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-03 00:29
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06F; G06F9/00; G06F9/06; G06F9/46; G06F9/54; G06F9/544
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 32
Claim 1
Independent Claim
109 words
Apparatus in a data processing system for performing an application-defined operation on a first data item as part of a system-defined operation on the first data item comprising: first system-defined means for accompanying the first data item with a second data item specifying an application-defined type. second system-defined means for establishing a correspondence between an executable definition of the application-defined operation and the type; and third system-defined means employed by the system-defined operation and responsive to the second data item for causing the executable definition corresponding to the type specified in the second data item to be executed on the first data item as part of the system-defined operation.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
109 words
Apparatus in a data processing system for performing an application-defined operation on a first data item as part of a system-defined operation on the first data item comprising: first system-defined means for accompanying the first data item with a second data item specifying an application-defined type. second system-defined means for establishing a correspondence between an executable definition of the application-defined operation and the type; and third system-defined means employed by the system-defined operation and responsive to the second data item for causing the executable definition corresponding to the type specified in the second data item to be executed on the first data item as part of the system-defined operation.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
72 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 1 wherein: the system-defined operation is sending the data from one component of the data processing system to another component thereof; both components further include the apparatus of claim 1; the application-defined operation in the apparatus of the one component processes the first data item prior to sending and/or the application-defined operation in the apparatus of the other component processes the first data item following sending.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
95 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 2 wherein: the one component is a client process and the other component is a server process which performs at least one function on data; the computer system further includes bulletin board means accessible to the client process for indicating whether the function performs the function on data having the type specified by the second data item; and the system-defined operation sends the first data item only if the bulletin board means indicates that the function is performed on data having the type specified by the second data item.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
88 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 3 wherein: the application-defined operation in the apparatus of the one component encodes the first data item into a first transfer syntax; the application-defined operation in the apparatus of the other component decodes first data item for the function from a second transfer syntax; the bulletin board means further indicates the second transfer syntax; and the system-defined operation sends the first data item only if the first transfer syntax is the same as the second transfer syntax indicated on the bulletin board.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
121 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 4 wherein: there are one or more application-defined types; the first transfer syntax is one of a first set of transfer syntaxes associated with a given one of the application defined types in the apparatus of the client process and the second transfer syntax is one of a second set of transfer syntaxes associated with the given one of the application defined types in the apparatus of the server process; the bulletin board means further indicates the second set of transfer syntaxes; and the system-defined operation sends the first data item only if at least one transfer syntax in the first set is the same as at least one transfer syntax in the second set.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
94 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 3 wherein: there is a plurality of application-defined types; the first system-defined means accompanies the first data item with one of the second data item; the bulletin board means indicates the types for which the server will perform the function on the first data item; and the system-defined operation sends the first data item only if the type specified by the second data item which accompanies the first data item is one of the types for which the bulletin board means indicates that the server performs the function.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
55 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 2 wherein: the one component and the other component are heterogeneous; and the application-defined operation in the apparatus of the component and the application-defined operation in the apparatus of the other component operate in succession to put the first data item into the form required by the other component.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
66 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 7 wherein: the data processing system employs a transfer syntax to transfer data from the one component to the other component; the application-defined operation in the apparatus of the one component encodes the first data item into the transfer syntax; and the application-defined operation in the apparatus of the other component decodes the first data item from the transfer syntax.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
39 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 1 wherein: the second system-defined means is an array with an element indexed by the second data item, the element containing at least a specifier for the executable definition of the application-defined operation.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
47 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 9 wherein: the application-defined operation is one of a plurality thereof and there is an executable definition corresponding to each of the application-defined operations and the element contains a specifier for the executable definition corresponding to each of the application-defined operations.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
31 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 10 wherein: the system-defined operation is one of a plurality thereof and the element associates each of the specifiers with one of the system-defined operations.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
30 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 9 wherein: the third system-defined means employs the second data item to access the element and executes the executable definition indicated by the specifier.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
37 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 9 wherein: the element further contains a name representing the type and the first system-defined means determines the value of the second data item by locating the element containing the name.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
46 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 1 wherein: the first data item is stored in a buffer; a header including the second data item accompanies the buffer; and the first system-defined means sets the second data item in the header as required to specify the type.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
62 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 1 wherein: the system-defined operation belongs to a set of system-defined operations including at least a send operation for sending the first data item to another component of the system, a send-receive operation for sending the first data item and receiving a reply from the other component, or a get reply operation for getting the reply.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
60 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 15 wherein: the send-receive operation has a send portion and a receive portion; and when the system operation is the send operation or the send portion of the send-receive operation, the application-defined operation is a first set of application-defined operations including a present operation, a routing operation, an encoding operation, and a postsend operation.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
43 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 16 wherein: when the system operation is the receive portion of the send-receive operation or the get reply operation, the application-defined operation is a second set of application-defined operations including a decode operation and a postreceive operation.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
27 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 15 wherein: the application-defined operation is a present operation when the system-defined operation is a send operation or a send-receive operation.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
37 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 15 wherein: the application-defined operation is an encode operation for encoding the first data item in a transfer syntax when the system-defined operation is a send operation or a send-receive operation.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
37 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 15 wherein: the application-defined operation is a routing operation for routing the first data item to the other component when the system-defined operation is a send operation or a send-receive operation.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
27 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 15 wherein: the application-defined operation is a postsend operation when the system-defined operation is a send operation or a send-receive operation.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
28 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 15 wherein: the application-defined operation is a postreceive operation when the system-defined operation is a send-receive operation or a get reply operation.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
38 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 15 wherein: the application-defined operation is a decode operation for decoding the first data item from a transfer syntax when the system-defined operation is a send-receive operation or a get reply operation.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
48 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 1 wherein: the application-defined operation is one of a plurality thereof, each of which has a corresponding executable definition and the second system-defined means establishes the correspondence between the executable definitions corresponding to the plurality of application defined operations and the type.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
40 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 24 wherein: the system defined operation is one of a plurality thereof and the second system-defined means further establishes a correspondence between each one of the executable definitions and one of the system-defined operations.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
47 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 1 wherein: the system-defined operation belongs to a set of system-defined operations including at least an allocate operation for allocating memory for the first data item, a deallocate operation for deallocating the memory, or a reallocate operation for reallocating the memory.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
47 words
The apparatus set forth in claim 26 wherein: the application-defined operation is an initialization operation for initializing the memory when the system defined operation is an allocate or reallocate operation or an uninitialization operation for uninitializing the memory when the system defined operation is a deallocate operation.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
195 words
A data processing system of the type employing a server process to perform a function on a first data item for a client process, the data processing system being characterized in that: the client process employs first system-defined means for accompanying the first data item with a second data item specifying an application-defined type, second system-defined means for establishing a correspondence between a first executable definition of a first application-defined operation and the type, and third system-defined means employed by the system-defined operation of sending the first data item to the server for responding to the second data item by causing the first executable definition corresponding to the type to be executed on the first data item as part of the system-defined sending operation; and the server process employs fourth system-defined means for establishing a correspondence between a second executable definition of a second application-defined operation and the type and fifth system-defined means employed by the system-defined operation of receiving the first data item from the client for responding to the second data item by causing the second executable definition to be executed on the first data item as part of the system-defined receiving operation.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
195 words
A data processing system of the type employing a server process to perform a function on a first data item for a client process, the data processing system being characterized in that: the client process employs first system-defined means for accompanying the first data item with a second data item specifying an application-defined type, second system-defined means for establishing a correspondence between a first executable definition of a first application-defined operation and the type, and third system-defined means employed by the system-defined operation of sending the first data item to the server for responding to the second data item by causing the first executable definition corresponding to the type to be executed on the first data item as part of the system-defined sending operation; and the server process employs fourth system-defined means for establishing a correspondence between a second executable definition of a second application-defined operation and the type and fifth system-defined means employed by the system-defined operation of receiving the first data item from the client for responding to the second data item by causing the second executable definition to be executed on the first data item as part of the system-defined receiving operation.
Claim 31
Independent Claim
105 words
A method used in a data processing system for performing an application-defined operation on a first data item as part of a system-defined operation on the first data item comprising the steps of: employing first system-defined means to establish a correspondence between an executable definition of the application-defined operation and an application-defined type; employing second system-defined means to accompany the first data item with a second data item specifying the type; and employing third system-defined means responsive to the second data item to cause the executable definition corresponding to the type to be executed on the first data item as part of the system-defined operation.
Claim 32
Independent Claim
105 words
A method used in a data processing system for performing an application-defined operation on a first data item as part of a system-defined operation on the first data item comprising the steps of: employing first system-defined means to establish a correspondence between an executable definition of the application-defined operation and an application-defined type; employing second system-defined means to accompany the first data item with a second data item specifying the type; and employing third system-defined means responsive to the second data item to cause the executable definition corresponding to the type to be executed on the first data item as part of the system-defined operation.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4885684A
Cited
US5075847A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1996-11-22 | 1997-05-24 | 1997-11-23 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2000-11-22 | 2001-05-24 | 2001-11-23 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2004-11-22 | 2005-05-24 | 2005-11-23 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |