US5253126A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Raw error monitoring and reporting
Assignee: Certance LLC
•
Filing: 1991-04-03
•
Granted: 1993-10-12
•
Expires: 2011-04-03
Abstract
Abstract A method for monitoring the performance of a DAT drive and a method for self-cleaning the tape heads of a DAT drive pursuant to the occurrence of an error that could not be corrected by re-reads or re-writes. The monitoring method includes the steps of (a) reading a tape, (b) determining for each of successive groups of frames respective A track and B track reference error counts representative of the A track and B track C1 error counts in each group of frames, each group having the same number of frames, and (c) providing a warning signal indicative of degraded performance if (i) either the A track reference counts for a predetermined number of consecutive frame groups exceed a predetermined threshold or the B track reference counts for a predetermined number of consecutive frame groups exceed a predetermined threshold, or (ii) if both the A track and B track reference counts for the predetermined number of consecutive frame groups exceed the predetermined threshold. The self-clean procedure includes the steps of moving the tape to the end of the tape at a speed higher than normal, moving the tape to the beginning of the tape at a speed higher than normal, positioning the tape at the location of the error, providing a warning to the user, and resuming the operation that resulted in occurrence of the error. If the error persists, the user is notified of the occurrence of an uncorrectable error.
Inventors
- 👤 Robert C. Richmond
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-05 19:52
CPC Classifications
G; G11; G11B; G11B15/00; G11B15/02; G11B15/026; G11B15/05; G11B15/087; G11B20/00; G11B20/10; G11B20/18; G11B20/1816; G11B27/00; G11B27/10; G11B27/34; G11B27/36; G11B33/00; G11B33/10; G11B5/00; G11B5/41; G11B2220/00; G11B2220/90; G11B2220/91; G11B2220/913
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
136 words
A method for monitoring the performance of a DAT drive, comprising the steps of: reading successive groups of frames from a tape, each group of frames having the same number of frames; determining for each group of frames read from the tape respective A track and B track reference error counts representative of the A track and B track C1 error counts in such group of frames; and providing a warning signal indicative of degraded performance if (i) the A track reference count for each group of S consecutive frame groups exceeds a predetermined threshold or the B track reference count for each group of S consecutive frame groups exceeds the predetermined threshold, or (ii) both the A track and B track reference counts for each group of S consecutive frame groups exceed the predetermined threshold.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
136 words
A method for monitoring the performance of a DAT drive, comprising the steps of: reading successive groups of frames from a tape, each group of frames having the same number of frames; determining for each group of frames read from the tape respective A track and B track reference error counts representative of the A track and B track C1 error counts in such group of frames; and providing a warning signal indicative of degraded performance if (i) the A track reference count for each group of S consecutive frame groups exceeds a predetermined threshold or the B track reference count for each group of S consecutive frame groups exceeds the predetermined threshold, or (ii) both the A track and B track reference counts for each group of S consecutive frame groups exceed the predetermined threshold.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
49 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the predetermined threshold is selected to represent a C1 error count that is greater than the range of the C1 error count encountered during normal operation and less than the error correction limit for the combination of C1, C2 and C3 error correction.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the A track and B track reference counts are determined from the Main area C1 error counts for the A tracks and the B tracks for each group of frames.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
74 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the step of providing a warning signal includes the steps of: providing a first warning if either but not both of the A track or B track reference counts for the predetermined number of successive frame groups exceed the predetermined threshold; and providing a second warning if both the A track and B track reference counts for the predetermined number of successive frame groups exceed the predetermined threshold.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 4 wherein the step of providing a first warning includes the step of indicating that a head clog may be present.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
166 words
Apparatus for monitoring the performance of a DAT drive, comprising: means for reading successive groups of frames from a tape and providing C1 error counts for each of the tracks of frames read from the tape, each group of frames having the same number of frames; processor means responsive to said reading means for determining for each group of frames read from the tape respective A track and B track reference error counts representative of the A track and B track C1 error counts in such group of frames, said processor means providing a warning signal indicative of degraded performance if (a) the A track reference count for each group of S consecutive frame groups exceeds a predetermined threshold or the B track reference count for each group of a predetermined number of consecutive frame groups exceeds the predetermined threshold, or (b) both the A track and B track reference counts for each group of S predetermined number of consecutive frame groups exceed the predetermined threshold.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
166 words
Apparatus for monitoring the performance of a DAT drive, comprising: means for reading successive groups of frames from a tape and providing C1 error counts for each of the tracks of frames read from the tape, each group of frames having the same number of frames; processor means responsive to said reading means for determining for each group of frames read from the tape respective A track and B track reference error counts representative of the A track and B track C1 error counts in such group of frames, said processor means providing a warning signal indicative of degraded performance if (a) the A track reference count for each group of S consecutive frame groups exceeds a predetermined threshold or the B track reference count for each group of a predetermined number of consecutive frame groups exceeds the predetermined threshold, or (b) both the A track and B track reference counts for each group of S predetermined number of consecutive frame groups exceed the predetermined threshold.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
49 words
The apparatus of claim 6 wherein the predetermined threshold is selected to represent a C1 error count that is greater than the range of the C1 error count encountered during normal operation and less than the error correction limit for the combination of C1, C2 and C3 error correction.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
36 words
The apparatus of claim 6 wherein the A track and B track reference counts are determined from the Main area C1 error counts for the A tracks and the B tracks for each group of frames.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US5124986A
Cited
US5113397A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1996-10-11 | 1997-04-12 | 1997-10-12 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2000-10-11 | 2001-04-12 | 2001-10-12 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2004-10-11 | 2005-04-12 | 2005-10-12 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |