US5247585A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Object recognition device
Assignee: Sigmax Ltd
•
Filing: 1989-12-01
•
Granted: 1993-09-21
•
Expires: 2009-12-01
Abstract
Abstract In an object recognition device for judging the normality of an object to be recognized, a monitor region including a plurality of monitor points and being represented by one of the monitor points is superimposed of an image produced by video signals obtained from the object. Additionally, the variation of luminance information obtained from the monitor region with respect to reference information is monitored. In a case where the position of the monitor region on the video image of the object becomes unsuitable for normality determination, a correction range is set at and around the monitor point and the setting of the monitor region is updated to one of a plurality of the monitor points having luminance information obtained when the monitor region is moved to one of the plurality of monitor points contained in the correction range, on which the judgement of normality is facilitated.
Inventors
- 👤 Masaharu Watanabe
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-02 22:45
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06T; G06T7/00; G06T7/0002; G06T7/0004; G06T7/70; G06T7/73; B; B29; B29C; B29C45/00; B29C45/17; B29C45/84; B29C45/842
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 14
Claim 1
Independent Claim
143 words
An object recognition device for judging whether or not an object to be recognized is normal comprising: means for superimposing a monitor region including a plurality of monitor points and being represented by one of said monitor points, on an image produced by video signals obtained from the object; means for setting a correction range at and around said one of said monitor points; means for monitoring a variation of luminance information obtained from the monitor points contained in said correction range with respect to reference information; and means for updating setting of the monitor region when positional deviation of said object occurs to be represented by one of a plurality of monitor points contained in said correction range based on said variations of luminance information of said monitor points contained in said correction range, on which the judgment of normality is facilitated.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
143 words
An object recognition device for judging whether or not an object to be recognized is normal comprising: means for superimposing a monitor region including a plurality of monitor points and being represented by one of said monitor points, on an image produced by video signals obtained from the object; means for setting a correction range at and around said one of said monitor points; means for monitoring a variation of luminance information obtained from the monitor points contained in said correction range with respect to reference information; and means for updating setting of the monitor region when positional deviation of said object occurs to be represented by one of a plurality of monitor points contained in said correction range based on said variations of luminance information of said monitor points contained in said correction range, on which the judgment of normality is facilitated.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
63 words
The device as claimed in claim 1, wherein said monitor point having said luminance information on which the judgement of normality is facilitated is determined according to an amount of variation of luminance of an area around a first monitor point whose luminance variation is maximum and a second monitor point having substantially the same luminance as that of the first monitor point.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
67 words
The device as claimed in claim 1, wherein said updating means updates said monitor region based on a detection locus along which said one of said plurality of monitor points is shifted while selecting a different one of said monitor points contained in said correction range in a predetermined sequence around said shifted monitor point and obtaining luminance information of said respective monitor points along said locus.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
27 words
The device as claimed in claim 3, wherein said detection locus has an outwardly expanding convoluted pattern starting at said one of said plurality of monitor points.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
60 words
The device as claimed in claim 4, further comprising means for providing a plurality of correction ranges including said shifted monitor points as common starting monitor points by grouping said shifted monitor points on said locus and for obtaining luminance information of selected one of said plurality of correction ranges so that an area of said correction range is variable.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
20 words
The device as claimed in any of claims 1 to 4, wherein an area of said correction range is variable.
Claim 8
Independent Claim
20 words
The device claimed in any of claims 1 to 5, wherein said setting of said monitor region is manually performed.
Claim 9
Independent Claim
27 words
The device claimed in any of claims 1 to 5, wherein said setting of said monitor region is performed according to data supplied from an external memory.
Claim 10
Independent Claim
19 words
The device as claimed in any of claims 1 to 5, wherein said monitor region has a variable shape.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
19 words
The device as claimed in claim 1, wherein said object is a product molded by an injection mold machine.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
56 words
The device as claimed in claim 10, wherein said variation of luminance information corresponds to a variation in luminance information between reference information and information obtained after said mold machine is opened but before said product is pushed out of said mold machine and information obtained after said product is pushed out of said mold machine.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
15 words
The device as claimed in claim 1, wherein said object is a printed circuit board.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
34 words
The device as claimed in claim 1, wherein said updating means updates said representing one of said monitor points to a monitor point having a corresponding variation of luminance which is a maximum value.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4479145A
Cited
US4579455A
Cited
US4876727A
Cited
US4805123A
Cited
US4805123B1
Cited
US4860371A
Cited
US4896278A
Cited
US4982439A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1996-09-20 | 1997-03-22 | 1997-09-21 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2000-09-20 | 2001-03-22 | 2001-09-21 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2004-09-20 | 2005-03-22 | 2005-09-21 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |