US5241185A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Proximity correction method for e-beam lithography
Assignee: International Business Machines Corp
•
Filing: 1992-01-08
•
Granted: 1993-08-31
•
Expires: 2012-01-08
Abstract
Abstract A method of proximity correction in an E-beam lithography system wherein each design shape is contracted by a predetermined bias and the E-beam dose required at any given point of the design is determined such that each of the design shapes is enlarged, on development, by the value of the predetermined bias, the determination of the E-beam dose being made in accordance with a predetermined relationship between an indicator, such as the electron backscatter, and the required E-beam dose, the indicator being defined for a plurality of points arranged on a coarse grid on the design and being indicative of the degree of the proximity effect at the respective point, the determination of the required dose being made by solving, at each of the plurality of points on the design, an integral equation relating the indicator to the E-beam dose distribution.
Inventors
- 👤 Abraham Z. Meiri
- 👤 Dov Ramm
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-07 02:22
CPC Classifications
H; H01; H01J; H01J37/00; H01J37/30; H01J37/317; H01J37/3174; B; B82; B82Y; B82Y10/00; B82Y40/00; H01J37/302; H01J37/3023; H01J37/3026; H01J2237/00; H01J2237/30; H01J2237/317; H01J2237/3175; H01J2237/31761; H01J2237/31764; H01J2237/31769
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 15
Claim 1
Independent Claim
174 words
Method of proximity correction in an E-Beam lithography system for exposing, on an E-beam sensitive resist, a design comprising at least one design shape, the method comprising; contracting each design shape by a predetermined bias to form a contracted design shape wherein the shape control requirement is that each contracted design shape be enlarged, on development, by the value of the predetermined bias; and determining the E-beam dose required at any given point of the design such that, on development, a shape control requirement is satisfied, wherein the determination of the E-beam dose: a) is made in accordance with a predetermined relationship between an indicator and the required E-beam dose, the indicator being indicative of the degree of the proximity effect at any point on the design; b) is constrained so that the dose is zero at points not on a design shape; and c) comprises the step of calculating the solution of an integral equation relating the indicator to the E-beam dose distribution at least at a plurality of points on the design.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
174 words
Method of proximity correction in an E-Beam lithography system for exposing, on an E-beam sensitive resist, a design comprising at least one design shape, the method comprising; contracting each design shape by a predetermined bias to form a contracted design shape wherein the shape control requirement is that each contracted design shape be enlarged, on development, by the value of the predetermined bias; and determining the E-beam dose required at any given point of the design such that, on development, a shape control requirement is satisfied, wherein the determination of the E-beam dose: a) is made in accordance with a predetermined relationship between an indicator and the required E-beam dose, the indicator being indicative of the degree of the proximity effect at any point on the design; b) is constrained so that the dose is zero at points not on a design shape; and c) comprises the step of calculating the solution of an integral equation relating the indicator to the E-beam dose distribution at least at a plurality of points on the design.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
13 words
Method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the indicator is the electron backscatter.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
67 words
Method as claimed in claim 2 wherein the predetermined relationship is predetermined by determining, for the E-beam lithography system and a predetermined value of the bias, a relationship between the backscatter at a point on the edge of a design shape and the E-beam dose required at that point such that the edge of the design shape be moved, on development, by the value of the bias.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
60 words
Method as claimed in claim 2 wherein the predetermined relationship is represented by the equation D=2t-2S, where D is the required dose, S is the electron backscatter and t is a threshold dose wherein if the dose applied to a point on the resist is greater than the threshold dose the resist is completely dissolved, on development, at that point.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
37 words
Method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the predetermined relationship between the indicator and the required dose is that the required E-beam dose is equal to the indicator for points which lie on a contracted design shape.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
34 words
Method as claimed in claim 5 wherein the determination of the E-beam dose at any given point on the design comprises combining the values of the indicator at ones of the plurality of points.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
67 words
Method as claimed in claim 6 comprising the step of partitioning the shapes of the design into edge regions and internal regions prior to determination of the required dose, each internal region being completely surrounded by an edge region, and wherein the E-beam dose for points in the internal regions is determined with the additional constraint that on development all the resist at that point be dissolved.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
86 words
Method as claimed in claim 7 wherein the solution of the integral equation comprises performing iteratively the steps of: determining, for each of the plurality of points, the indicator for a trial dose function; determining, in accordance with the predetermined relationship and from the value of the indicator at each of the plurality of points, the dose required at each of the plurality of points such that the shape control requirement be satisfied and using the determined required dose values as the next trial dose function.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
42 words
Method as claimed in claim 8 wherein the step of determining the required dose comprises multiplying the dose by a correction factor, the correction factor substantially correcting for the shape distortion caused by the forward scattering of the electrons from the resist.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
34 words
Method as claimed claim 9 wherein the plurality of points are arranged on a cartesian grid, the spacing of the grid points being greater than the smallest linear dimension of the smallest design shape.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
167 words
Proximity correction system for an E-beam lithography system wherein a design comprising at least one design shape is exposed on an E-beam sensitive resist, the system comprising: means for contracting each design shape by a predetermined bias to form a contracted design shape and logic means for determining the E-beam dose required at any given point of the design such that each contracted design shape is enlarged, on development, by the value of the predetermined bias, and wherein; a) said logic means determines the required E-beam dose according to a predetermined relationship between an indicator and the required E-beam dose, the indicator being indicative of the degree of the proximity effect at any point on the design, b) said logic means constrains the required E-beam dose to be zero at points not on a design shape; and c) said logic means comprises means for calculating the solution, at a plurality of points on the design, of an integral equation relating the indicator to the E-beam dose distribution.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
167 words
Proximity correction system for an E-beam lithography system wherein a design comprising at least one design shape is exposed on an E-beam sensitive resist, the system comprising: means for contracting each design shape by a predetermined bias to form a contracted design shape and logic means for determining the E-beam dose required at any given point of the design such that each contracted design shape is enlarged, on development, by the value of the predetermined bias, and wherein; a) said logic means determines the required E-beam dose according to a predetermined relationship between an indicator and the required E-beam dose, the indicator being indicative of the degree of the proximity effect at any point on the design, b) said logic means constrains the required E-beam dose to be zero at points not on a design shape; and c) said logic means comprises means for calculating the solution, at a plurality of points on the design, of an integral equation relating the indicator to the E-beam dose distribution.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
15 words
A proximity correction system, as in claim 11, wherein the indicator is the electron backscatter.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
70 words
A proximity correction system, as in claim 12, wherein the predetermined relationship is represented by the equation D=2t-2S and wherein D is the required dose, S is the electron backscatter, and t is a threshold dose such that when a dose is applied to a point on the resist which is greater than said threshold dose then the resist is completely dissolved, on development, at that point on the resist.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4500790A
Cited
US4463265A
Cited
EP0110042A2
Cited
US4520269A
Cited
US4943729A
Cited
US5051598A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1996-08-30 | 1997-03-01 | 1997-08-31 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2000-08-30 | 2001-03-01 | 2001-08-31 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2004-08-30 | 2005-03-01 | 2005-08-31 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |