US5214508A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Spatial bandwidth testing for digital data-compressed video systems
Assignee: Tektronix Inc
•
Filing: 1992-02-14
•
Granted: 1993-05-25
•
Expires: 2012-02-14
Abstract
Abstract Spatial bandwidth testing for digital data-compressed video systems is performed using a complex, or high entropy, test signal. A portion of the test signal is acquired as a control frame. This control frame is divided into a plurality of blocks. Each block is processed by a two-dimensional Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT). The test signal is input to a digital data-compressed video system and a corresponding portion of the output of the video system, a test frame, is acquired and processed in the same manner as the control frame. The resulting coefficient arrays from the control and test frames are compared to each other to obtain an output array of ratios for each block. The ratio of those coefficients corresponding to the predominant frequency of each block of the control frame are displayed as a three-dimensional gain plot. The ratio of those coefficients corresponding to low frequencies of each block of the control frame are displayed as a three-dimensional noise plot. The resulting plots provide an objective, visual indication of the characteristics of the digital data-compressed video system.
Inventors
- 👤 Douglas C. Stevens
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 22:03
CPC Classifications
H; H04; H04N; H04N17/00; H04N17/004; G; G06; G06T; G06T9/00; G06T9/007; H04N7/00; H04N7/24
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
151 words
A method of spatial bandwidth testing for a digital data-compressed video system comprising the steps of: generating a complex test signal having a range of frequencies in each of the horizontal, vertical and temporal dimensions; applying the complex test signal to the input of the video system; acquiring a portion of the complex test signal as a control frame and a corresponding portion of the output from the video system as a test frame; dividing the control and test frames into corresponding blocks of pixel data; obtaining an array of spectral coefficients for each block to produce a reference array of coefficients for blocks from the control frame and a test array of coefficients for blocks from the test frame; comparing the reference array and the test array to obtain a ratio between the corresponding coefficients; and plotting the ratios to provide a visual display of characteristics of the video system.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
151 words
A method of spatial bandwidth testing for a digital data-compressed video system comprising the steps of: generating a complex test signal having a range of frequencies in each of the horizontal, vertical and temporal dimensions; applying the complex test signal to the input of the video system; acquiring a portion of the complex test signal as a control frame and a corresponding portion of the output from the video system as a test frame; dividing the control and test frames into corresponding blocks of pixel data; obtaining an array of spectral coefficients for each block to produce a reference array of coefficients for blocks from the control frame and a test array of coefficients for blocks from the test frame; comparing the reference array and the test array to obtain a ratio between the corresponding coefficients; and plotting the ratios to provide a visual display of characteristics of the video system.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
35 words
A method as recited in claim 1 wherein the complex test signal comprises a modified zoneplate signal having a range of frequencies from a minimum to a maximum value in both horizontal and vertical directions.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
33 words
A method as recited in claim 2 wherein the minimum frequency value in both horizontal and vertical directions occurs at the upper left-hand corner of a video display of the modified zoneplate signal.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
35 words
A method as recited in claim 2 wherein the minimum frequency value in both horizontal and vertical directions occurs at the middle of the left-hand side of a video display of the modified zoneplate signal.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
30 words
A method as recited in claim 1 wherein the portion of the complex test signal and the corresponding portion of the video system output comprise one frame of video data.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
26 words
A method as recited in claim 1 wherein the obtaining step comprises the step of determining the maximum coefficient for each block of the control array.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
56 words
A method as recited in claim 6 wherein the comparing step comprises the step of determining a gain characteristic for the video system as a function of the ratio of the corresponding test coefficients to the coefficients of the control array that exceed a given percentage of the value of the maximum coefficients for each block.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
63 words
A method as recited in claim 6 wherein the comparing step comprises the step of determining a noise characteristic for the video system as a function of the ratio of the difference between the corresponding test coefficients and the control coefficients less than a given percentage of the value of the maximum coefficients for each block to the maximum coefficient for each block
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
57 words
A method as recited in claim 8 wherein the comparing step further comprises the step of determining a gain characteristic for the video system as a function of the ratio of the corresponding test coefficients to the coefficients of the control array that exceed a given percentage of the value of the maximum coefficients for each block.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1996-05-24 | 1996-11-23 | 1997-05-25 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2000-05-24 | 2000-11-23 | 2001-05-25 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2004-05-24 | 2004-11-23 | 2005-05-25 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |