US5205936A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Sequencing batch reactors
Assignee: Waterlink Inc
•
Filing: 1992-02-05
•
Granted: 1993-04-27
•
Expires: 2012-02-05
Abstract
Abstract A sequencing batch reactor is controlled to provide an effective, efficient treatment of raw waste water. Controls include regular withdrawal of mixed liquor during each cycle of operation. The withdrawal is volumetrically controlled to provide a sludge retention time of 5 to 10 days in the system. This produces a carbon and nitrogen oxydizing bacterial culture with good setting properties. Hydraulic loads in the system are controlled according to liquid levels, while the bacterial processes are controlled by timed sequences. A storm control procedure monitors the influent rate and shortens the cycle times according to the magnitude rate, to increase the system capacity. The system also includes a novel effluent withdrawal system, with a check valve controlled intake about midway up the reactor. This is trouble-free, with the check valve preventing sludge entry into the effluent withdrawal and maintaining prime on the effluent withdrawal pump.
Inventors
- 👤 Brian H. Topnik
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-04 18:57
CPC Classifications
C; C02; C02F; C02F3/00; C02F3/02; C02F3/12; C02F3/1236; C02F3/1263; C02F3/006; Y; Y02; Y02W; Y02W10/00; Y02W10/10
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
146 words
A storm control procedure for use in a process of treating influent waste water which treatment process comprises: fill and react cycle comprising supplying waste water to be treated to a reactor and injecting air into the waste water; react cycle comprising aerobically treating the waste water in the reactor for a predetermined react time after completion of the fill and react cycle; settle cycle comprising maintaining quiescent conditions in the reactor for a predetermined settle time to allow sludge in the waste water to settle; and decant cycle comprising withdrawing effluent from the reactor, the storm control procedure comprising: monitoring the actual waste water influent rate; comparing the actual waste water influent rate with a selected waste water influent rate; and reducing the duration of at least one of said cycles when the actual waste water influent rate exceeds the selected waste water influent rate.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
146 words
A storm control procedure for use in a process of treating influent waste water which treatment process comprises: fill and react cycle comprising supplying waste water to be treated to a reactor and injecting air into the waste water; react cycle comprising aerobically treating the waste water in the reactor for a predetermined react time after completion of the fill and react cycle; settle cycle comprising maintaining quiescent conditions in the reactor for a predetermined settle time to allow sludge in the waste water to settle; and decant cycle comprising withdrawing effluent from the reactor, the storm control procedure comprising: monitoring the actual waste water influent rate; comparing the actual waste water influent rate with a selected waste water influent rate; and reducing the duration of at least one of said cycles when the actual waste water influent rate exceeds the selected waste water influent rate.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
39 words
A control procedure according to claim 1 comprising sequentially reducing the duration of a plurality of the cycles of the treatment process as the actual waste water influent rate sequentially exceeds a plurality of selected waste water influent rates.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
49 words
A control procedure according to claim 1 comprising comparing the actual waste water influent rate to the apparatus with a selected first phase influent rates and reducing the duration of the decant cycle in response to an actual waste water influent rate greater than the first phase influent rate.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
66 words
A control process according to claim 3 further comprising comparing the actual waste water influent rate with a second selected storm phase waste water influent rate greater than the first storm phase waste water influent rate and reducing the duration of the settle cycle to less than the predetermined settle time in response to an actual influent rate greater than the second storm phase influent rate.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
68 words
A control procedure according to claim 4, further comprising comparing the actual and third storm phase influent rate with a third selected storm phase waste water influent rate greater than the second storm phase waste water influent rate and reducing the duration of the react cycle to less than the predetermined react time in response to an actual influent rate greater than the third storm phase influent rate.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
58 words
A control process according to claim 5 further comprising comparing the actual waste water influent rate with a fourth selected storm phase waste water influent rate greater than the third storm phase waste water influent rate reducing the react cycle duration to zero in response to an actual influent rate greater than the fourth storm phase influent rate.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
79 words
A control process according to claim 6 wherein the duration of the decant cycle is reduced by substantially one half, the duration of the settle cycle is reduced to substantially one half of the predetermined settled time and the duration of the react cycle is reduced to substantially one half of the predetermined react time in response to an actual influent rate greater than the third storm phase influent rates and less than the fourth storm phase influent rate.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
20 words
A control process according to claim 3 wherein the duration of the decant cycle is reduced by substantially one half.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
38 words
A control process according to claim 4 wherein the duration of the decant cycle is reduced by substantially one half and the duration of the settle cycle is reduced to substantially one half of the predetermined settled time.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1996-04-26 | 1996-10-26 | 1997-04-27 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2000-04-26 | 2000-10-26 | 2001-04-27 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2004-04-26 | 2004-10-26 | 2005-04-27 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |