US5170780A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of credibility assessment based on feedback-elicited P3 responses of brain
Assignee: Individual
•
Filing: 1991-05-30
•
Granted: 1992-12-15
•
Expires: 2011-05-30
Abstract
Abstract A method for evoking an event related potential in a person in order to evaluate the person's beliefs, knowledge, attitudes, or veracity relating to certain subject matter comprising the steps of presenting the person with a series of statements or questions at least some of which relate to the subject matter, having the person make replies of affirmance or disaffirmance about each statement or question, presenting the person with a purported evaluation of the veracity of each of his replies, each of the evaluations caused to vary to present at least confirmation or disconfirmation of the replies and measuring the P3 of the person in response to the purported evaluations whereby the beliefs, knowledge, attitudes, or veracity of the person about the subject matter can be determined.
Inventors
- 👤 J. Peter Rosenfeld
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-07 13:59
CPC Classifications
A; A61; A61B; A61B5/00; A61B5/24; A61B5/316; A61B5/369; A61B5/377
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 21
Claim 1
Independent Claim
64 words
A method of evaluating the beliefs, attitudes, or credibility of a subject comprising the steps of: (1) asking the subject a question; (2) providing the subject with feedback as to whether or not a reply by the subject to said question is correct: (3) evaluating the subject's physiological ERP response to the feedback to evaluate the subject's beliefs, attitudes, or credibility regarding his reply.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
64 words
A method of evaluating the beliefs, attitudes, or credibility of a subject comprising the steps of: (1) asking the subject a question; (2) providing the subject with feedback as to whether or not a reply by the subject to said question is correct: (3) evaluating the subject's physiological ERP response to the feedback to evaluate the subject's beliefs, attitudes, or credibility regarding his reply.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 1 further including the step of having the subject provide an assessment of how confident he is in the correctness of his response.
Claim 4
Independent Claim
83 words
A method of evaluation the belief, attitudes, or credibility of a subject comprising the steps of: (1) asking the subject a series of questions to which the subject provides replies: (2) providing the subject with feedback with respect to each question of said series of questions as to whether or not the reply by the subject to said question is correct; and (3) evaluating the subject's physiological ERP response to the feedback to evaluate the subject's beliefs, attitudes, or credibility regarding his replies.
Claim 5
Independent Claim
83 words
A method of evaluation the belief, attitudes, or credibility of a subject comprising the steps of: (1) asking the subject a series of questions to which the subject provides replies: (2) providing the subject with feedback with respect to each question of said series of questions as to whether or not the reply by the subject to said question is correct; and (3) evaluating the subject's physiological ERP response to the feedback to evaluate the subject's beliefs, attitudes, or credibility regarding his replies.
Claim 6
Independent Claim
129 words
A method for evoking an event related potential in a subject relating to an event about which the subject may have knowledge, comprising the steps of: presenting the subject with a series of statements at least some of which relate to the event about which the subject may have knowledge, and further about which said series of statements the subject is to make reply representations of affirmance or disaffirmance; presenting the subject with a purported evaluation of the veracity of each of the subject's replies, each of said evaluations caused to vary to present at least confirmation or disconfirmation of said replies of the subject; measuring the P3 of the subject in response to the purported evaluation; whereby the knowledge of the subject about the event can be determined.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
129 words
A method for evoking an event related potential in a subject relating to an event about which the subject may have knowledge, comprising the steps of: presenting the subject with a series of statements at least some of which relate to the event about which the subject may have knowledge, and further about which said series of statements the subject is to make reply representations of affirmance or disaffirmance; presenting the subject with a purported evaluation of the veracity of each of the subject's replies, each of said evaluations caused to vary to present at least confirmation or disconfirmation of said replies of the subject; measuring the P3 of the subject in response to the purported evaluation; whereby the knowledge of the subject about the event can be determined.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 4 in which the subject provides a representation of the level of confidence in the correctness of each of his reply representations.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method of claim 4 in which the evaluation is a feedback representation.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 4 in which the subject is informed that the veracity of each of his reply representations is being made.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
82 words
The method of claim 4 in which said evaluations are made to vary in accordance with a predetermined schedule so that a predetermined percentage of said evaluations of the subject's reply representations related to the event affirm said reply representations and a predetermined percentage of said evaluations of the subject's reply representations related to the event disaffirm said reply representations whereby disaffirmance of the subject's negative representation related to the event is indicative of the subjects lack of knowledge concerning the event.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
118 words
A method for evoking an event related potential in a subject relating to an event about which the subject may have knowledge, comprising the steps of: asking the subject personal questions to which the subject may reply in either the positive or negative; leading the subject to believe that his answers will be analyzed to determine his veracity and also that an evaluation of his veracity will be presented to him; providing the subject with a purported evaluation of his veracity; and analyzing the subject's P3 brain waves whereby the subject's veracity or personal knowledge with respect to certain questions can be determined based upon a comparison of the P3 response to intentionally presented disconfirming and confirming feedback.
Claim 13
Independent Claim
118 words
A method for evoking an event related potential in a subject relating to an event about which the subject may have knowledge, comprising the steps of: asking the subject personal questions to which the subject may reply in either the positive or negative; leading the subject to believe that his answers will be analyzed to determine his veracity and also that an evaluation of his veracity will be presented to him; providing the subject with a purported evaluation of his veracity; and analyzing the subject's P3 brain waves whereby the subject's veracity or personal knowledge with respect to certain questions can be determined based upon a comparison of the P3 response to intentionally presented disconfirming and confirming feedback.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
210 words
The method of claim 9 in which the subject's veracity or personal knowledge with respect to certain questions can be determined based upon the following criteria: a truthful subject providing a truthful reply to a specific question will have the expectation of being believed so that if evaluating feedback is provided in reply to his honest response indicating untruthfulness, his disconfirmed expectancy should results in a relatively large P3 response; an untruthful subject providing an untruthful reply to a specific question will have a relatively low expectation of being believed so that if evaluating feedback is provided in reply to his untruthful dishonest response indicating untruthfulness, his confirmed expectancy should results in a relatively smaller P3 response; a truthful subject providing a truthful reply to a specific question will have the expectation of being believed so that if evaluating feedback is provided in reply to his honest response indicating truthfulness, his confirmed expectancy should result in a relatively small P3 response; and an untruthful subject providing an untruthful reply to a specific question will have a relatively low expectation of being believed so that if an evaluating feedback indicating is provided in reply to his untruthful response indicating truthfulness, his disconfirmed expectancy should results in a relatively large P3 response.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 9 in which the personal questions asked of the subject concern attitudes, thoughts, memories, actions, or behavior.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 9 including the step of presenting the personal questions on a computer terminal screen.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 9 including the step of having the subject repeat each of the questions and then respond affirmatively or negatively in reply to each question.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 9 wherein the step of providing the subject with a purported evaluation of his veracity further includes flashing a message on a computer screen.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 9 including the step of having the subject repeat each purported evaluation of his veracity.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 15 including the step of having the subject answer in a complete sentence specific to the question asked.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
61 words
The method of claim 9 in which the purported evaluations are determined by a pre-existing schedule so that a certain percent of the subject's answers on a given question will evoke a "true" and the remainder, a "false" whereby the feedback itself is thus false at times and unrelated to the subject's cognitions or emotions at the time of his answer.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4932416A
Cited
US4941477A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1995-12-15 | 1996-06-15 | 1996-12-15 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1999-12-15 | 2000-06-15 | 2000-12-15 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2003-12-15 | 2004-06-15 | 2004-12-15 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |