Vision guided laser welding

Claim 3

The method defined in claim 1, which further includes successively repeating steps D through I to effect a weld joint at each of a plurality of weld sites on the workpiece.

Claim 4

The method defined in claim 1, wherein the camera views the weld site through the laser beam optics of the focussing head.

Claim 5

The method defined in claim 3, wherein said locating step includes the steps of 1) calculating from a first plurality of identified structural feature positions a first position for the optimum weld point, 2) calculating from a second plurality of identified structural feature positions relative to said first optimum weld point position a second position for the optimum weld point, and 3) accepting the first optimum weld point position as the true optimum weld point position when the second optimum weld point position is substantially coincident therewith.

Claim 6

The method defined in claim 3, which further includes the step of back illuminating the workpiece to cast a high contrast image of the weld site for viewing by the camera.

Claim 7

The method defined in claim 3, which further includes a calibration procedure comprising the steps of 1) placing a coupon of solid sheet material on the positioning table, 2) burning a hole in the coupon using the laser beam, 3) storing a first image of the camera field of view including the burn hole, 4) inspecting the stored image to define the position of the centroid of the burn hole and centerline in the camera field of view, 5) indexing the coupon a predetermined distance along the X axis of the positioning table, 6) storing a second image of the coupon including the burn hole, 7) inspecting the second image to define the position in the camera field of view of the burn hole centeroid, 8) indexing the coupon a predetermined distance along the Y axis of the positioning table, 9) storing a third image of the coupon including the burn hole, 10) inspecting the third image to define the position in the camera field of view of the burn hold centroid, and 11) ratioing the length of X and Y burn hole centroid movements in pixel dimensional units of the camera field of view stored image with the lengths of X and Y burn hole centroid movements in positioning table dimensional units to derive respective X and Y axes calibration constants.

Claim 8

The method defined in claim 3, wherein the workpiece is a nuclear fuel bundle spacer including a matrix array of ferrules and a plurality weld sites, each including the most poximate tangent points on an adjacent pair of ferrules at the ends thereof facing the focussing head and camera.

Claim 9

The method defined in claim 7, wherein the spacer structural features are points on the inner and outer edges of each adjacent pair of ferrules.

Claim 10

The method defined in claim 8, wherein said locating step includes the steps of 1) identifying the respective positions of first and second extreme points on the inner edges of the adjacent ferrules nearest the proximate tangent points, and, 2) calculating the respective midpoints between the X and Y pixel coordinates of the first and second points to define the position of the optimum weld point.

Claim 11

The method defined in claim 9, wherein said locating step further includes the step of confirming that the calculated optimum weld point position defined by calculating step 2) is the true optimum weld point position by 1) identifying the positions of third and fourth points on the outer edge of one ferrule that are equidistant (M) from the calculated optimum weld point position to each side of the weld site, 2) identifying the positions of fifth and sixth points on the outer edge of the other ferrule that are equidistant (M) from the calculated optimum weld point position to each side of the weld site, 3) calculating the midpoint of a first line connecting the third and fifth points and the midpoint of a second line connecting the fourth and sixth points, 4) calculating the midpoint of a third line connecting the first and second line midpoints to define a confirming optimum weld point position, and 5) accepting the calculated optimum weld point position as the true optimum weld point position when the confirming optimum weld point position is substantially coincident therewith.

Claim 12

The method defined in claim 10, which further includes the step of back illuminating the spacer to cast a high contrast image of the weld site for viewing by the camera.

Claim 13

The method defined in claim 5, which further includes the steps of 1) storing an image of the weld joint, and 2) inspecting the stored image pixel data to determine if the weld joint meets quality assurance standards.

Claim 14

Apparatus for affecting a precision weld joint at a weld site on a workpiece, said apparatus including, in combination: A. an X-Y positioning table for supporting the workpiece; B. a laser welder including a focussing head for directing a laser beam at the workpiece; C. a camera mounted in fixed relation, to said focussing head with the centerline of the laser beam within the field of view of said camera; D. a X-Y positioning table controller; E. means providing coarse positioning inputs to said controller for indexing said table to nominally position a weld site within the field of view of said camera; F. means responsive to the video output of said camera for storing an image of the weld site in pixel data format; and G. a computer for processing the stored pixel data to 1) identify the positions in said camera field of view of workpiece structural features adjacent the weld site, 2) calculate, from the identified structural feature positions, the position of an optimum weld point on the weld site relative to the position of the centerline of the laser beam, and 3) provide fine positioning inputs to said controller for indexing said table to position the optimum weld point in alignment with the laser beam centerline preparatory to affecting a weld joint by the laser beam.

Claim 15

Apparatus for affecting a precision weld joint at a weld site on a workpiece, said apparatus including, in combination: A. an X-Y positioning table for supporting the workpiece; B. a laser welder including a focussing head for directing a laser beam at the workpiece; C. a camera mounted in fixed relation, to said focussing head with the centerline of the laser beam within the field of view of said camera; D. a X-Y positioning table controller; E. means providing coarse positioning inputs to said controller for indexing said table to nominally position a weld site within the field of view of said camera; F. means responsive to the video output of said camera for storing an image of the weld site in pixel data format; and G. a computer for processing the stored pixel data to 1) identify the positions in said camera field of view of workpiece structural features adjacent the weld site, 2) calculate, from the identified structural feature positions, the position of an optimum weld point on the weld site relative to the position of the centerline of the laser beam, and 3) provide fine positioning inputs to said controller for indexing said table to position the optimum weld point in alignment with the laser beam centerline preparatory to affecting a weld joint by the laser beam.

Claim 16

The apparatus defined in claim 13, wherein said camera is positioned to view the weld site through laser bean optics of said focussing head.

Claim 17

The apparatus defined in claim 14, which further includes an optimum weld point location algorithm for controlling the processing of pixel data by said computer to 1) calculate from a first plurality of identified structural feature positions a first position of an optimum weld point, 2) calculate from a second plurality of identified structural feature positions relative to said first optimum weld point position a second position of an optimum weld point, and, 3) accepting said first optimum weld point position as a true optimum weld point position when said first and second optimum weld point positions are substantially coincident.

Claim 18

The apparatus defined in claim 15, which further includes a light source for back illuminating the workpiece to cast a high contrast image of the weld site for viewing by said camera.

Claim 19

The apparatus defined in claim 16, wherein the workpiece is a nuclear fuel bundle spacer including a matrix array of ferrules and a plurality weld sites, each including the most poximate tangent points on an adjacent pair of ferrules at the ends thereof facing said focussing head and camera.

Claim 20

The apparatus defined in claim 17, wherein the spacer structural features are points on the inner and outer edges of each adjacent pair of ferrules.

Claim 21

The apparatus defined in claim 18, which further includes a calibration algorithm for operating said computer to locate the position of the centerline of said laser beam in the field of view of said camera and to calibrate the pixel dimension units of the stored field of view X-Y coordinate system to the dimension units of the X-Y coordinate system of said table.