US5146539A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for utilizing formant frequencies in speech recognition
Assignee: Texas Instruments Inc
•
Filing: 1988-11-08
•
Granted: 1992-09-08
•
Expires: 2008-11-08
Abstract
Abstract A speech recognizer which utilizes hypothesis testing to determine formant frequencies for use in speech recognition. A pre-processor (36) receives speech signal frames and utilizes linear predictive coding to generate all formant frequency candidates. An optimum formant selector (38) operates with a comparator (40) to select from the formant candidates those formants which best match stored reference formants. A dynamic time warper (42) and high level recognition logic (44) operate to determine whether or not to declare a recognized word.
Inventors
- 👤 George R. Doddington
- 👤 Yeunung Chen
- 👤 R. Gary Leonard
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-26 08:22
CPC Classifications
G; G10; G10L; G10L15/00; G10L15/02; G10L25/00; G10L25/03; G10L25/15
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 9
Claim 1
Independent Claim
191 words
A method for recognizing speech signals organized into a sequence of frames, said method comprising: storing a plurality of reference frames of formant frequencies representative of linguistic units providing a vocabulary of words; generating a plurality of format frequency candidates for each frame of the speech signals desired to be recognized; creating a plurality of all possible subsets of optimum formant frequencies for each frame based upon the plurality of formant frequency candidates generated for the respective frame, wherein each subset comprises some but not all of the formant frequency candidates generated for that frame; comparing each subset of the plurality of all possible subsets of optimum formant frequencies for each frame of the speech signals to be recognized with each of the plurality of reference frames of formant frequencies; selecting one subset from said plurality of all possible subsets of optimum formant frequencies for each frame from said formant frequency candidates which best matches the stored formant frequencies of a corresponding reference frame of formant frequencies in accordance with predetermined criteria; and recognizing said speech signals in response to the selected one subset of optimum formant frequencies for respective frames.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
191 words
A method for recognizing speech signals organized into a sequence of frames, said method comprising: storing a plurality of reference frames of formant frequencies representative of linguistic units providing a vocabulary of words; generating a plurality of format frequency candidates for each frame of the speech signals desired to be recognized; creating a plurality of all possible subsets of optimum formant frequencies for each frame based upon the plurality of formant frequency candidates generated for the respective frame, wherein each subset comprises some but not all of the formant frequency candidates generated for that frame; comparing each subset of the plurality of all possible subsets of optimum formant frequencies for each frame of the speech signals to be recognized with each of the plurality of reference frames of formant frequencies; selecting one subset from said plurality of all possible subsets of optimum formant frequencies for each frame from said formant frequency candidates which best matches the stored formant frequencies of a corresponding reference frame of formant frequencies in accordance with predetermined criteria; and recognizing said speech signals in response to the selected one subset of optimum formant frequencies for respective frames.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
40 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said step of generating a plurality of formant frequency candidates for each frame of the speech signals to be recognized utilizes linear predictive coding to generate said formant frequency candidates for the respective frame.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
53 words
The method of claim 2 wherein said step of generating a plurality of formant frequency candidates for each frame of the speech signals to be recognized further includes: factoring the output of said linear predictive coding with a Bairstow algorithm to provide roots indicative of respective formant frequency candidates for each respective frame.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said step of selecting utilizes the pitch frequency of the speech signals as an aspect of said predetermined criteria.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said step of selecting comprises: generating representations of said formant frequency candidates as mel frequency and log bandwidth; and modeling said representations as multivariate Gaussian random variables.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
52 words
The method of claim 5 wherein said step of recognizing said speech signals further includes: computing a likelihood function of the best match of a selected subset of optimum formant frequencies for a respective frame with a corresponding reference frame of formant frequencies utilizing a covariance matrix being correct speech signal recognition.
Claim 8
Independent Claim
211 words
A method for recognizing speech signals organized into a sequence of frames, said method comprising: storing a plurality of reference frames of formant frequencies representative of linguistic units providing a vocabulary of words in which each reference frame contains a predetermined number of primary formant frequencies; generating a plurality of format frequency candidates for each frame of the speech signals desired to be recognized; grouping the formant frequency candidates for each frame into all possible combinations of subsets thereof having the same predetermined number of formant frequencies of each of the plurality of reference frames, wherein each subset comprises some but not all of the formant frequency candidates generated for that frame; comparing each of the possible combinations of subsets of formant frequency candidates for each frame of the speech signals to be recognized with the formant frequencies contained in each of the plurality of reference frames; selecting one subset of all possible subsets of optimum formant frequencies for each frame from said formant frequency candidates for the respective frame which best matches the stored formant frequencies of a respective reference frame in accordance with predetermined criteria; and recognizing said speech signals in response to the selected optimum formant frequencies comprising the selected subset of formant frequencies for each respective frame.
Claim 9
Independent Claim
211 words
A method for recognizing speech signals organized into a sequence of frames, said method comprising: storing a plurality of reference frames of formant frequencies representative of linguistic units providing a vocabulary of words in which each reference frame contains a predetermined number of primary formant frequencies; generating a plurality of format frequency candidates for each frame of the speech signals desired to be recognized; grouping the formant frequency candidates for each frame into all possible combinations of subsets thereof having the same predetermined number of formant frequencies of each of the plurality of reference frames, wherein each subset comprises some but not all of the formant frequency candidates generated for that frame; comparing each of the possible combinations of subsets of formant frequency candidates for each frame of the speech signals to be recognized with the formant frequencies contained in each of the plurality of reference frames; selecting one subset of all possible subsets of optimum formant frequencies for each frame from said formant frequency candidates for the respective frame which best matches the stored formant frequencies of a respective reference frame in accordance with predetermined criteria; and recognizing said speech signals in response to the selected optimum formant frequencies comprising the selected subset of formant frequencies for each respective frame.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3553372A
Cited
US4227177A
Cited
US4346262A
Cited
US4486899A
Cited
US4424415A
Cited
US4590605A
Cited
US4536886A
Cited
US4625286A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1995-09-08 | 1996-03-09 | 1996-09-08 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1999-09-08 | 2000-03-09 | 2000-09-08 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2003-09-08 | 2004-03-09 | 2004-09-08 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |