US5139028A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Heart rejection monitoring apparatus and method
Assignee: University of Florida
•
Filing: 1990-10-26
•
Granted: 1992-08-18
•
Expires: 2010-10-26
Abstract
Abstract An implantable cardiac allograft rejection monitoring apparatus and method for measuring stimulated intracardiac electrogram potentials, performing processing and time based analysis of changes in the potential, and deriving from the time history of the analyzed signals allograft rejection control parameters. The apparatus communicates the allograft rejection control parameters to an external communicating device and may use the parameters to control the output of an implanted drug infusion pump.
Inventors
- 👤 Bruce M. Steinhaus
- 👤 Fred I. Vance
- 👤 Anne Curtis
- 👤 Ken Koestner
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-24 00:21
CPC Classifications
A; A61; A61M; A61M5/00; A61M5/14; A61M5/168; A61M5/172; A61M5/1723; A61B; A61B5/00; A61B5/0002; A61B5/0004; A61B5/0006; A61B5/24; A61B5/316; A61B5/318; A61B5/346; A61B5/349; A61B5/35; A61B5/41; A61B5/413; A61B5/72; A61B5/7203; A61B5/7217; A61B5/7207
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 26
Claim 1
Independent Claim
106 words
A cardiac allograft rejection monitor adapted to be implanted in a patient, comprising: means for generating cardiac stimulation pulses, means for sensing a stimulated cardiac depolarization signal in response to the generation of a cardiac stimulation pulse, means for periodically ascertaining the value of a measured allograft rejection control parameter which is based on an analysis of the sensed stimulated cardiac depolarization signal, means for detecting changes in the measured allograft rejection control parameter over time which are indicative of the occurrence of allograft rejection, and means for storing information indicative of the occurrence of allograft rejection and for communicating said information to an external device.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
106 words
A cardiac allograft rejection monitor adapted to be implanted in a patient, comprising: means for generating cardiac stimulation pulses, means for sensing a stimulated cardiac depolarization signal in response to the generation of a cardiac stimulation pulse, means for periodically ascertaining the value of a measured allograft rejection control parameter which is based on an analysis of the sensed stimulated cardiac depolarization signal, means for detecting changes in the measured allograft rejection control parameter over time which are indicative of the occurrence of allograft rejection, and means for storing information indicative of the occurrence of allograft rejection and for communicating said information to an external device.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
88 words
A cardiac allograft rejection monitor in accordance with claim 1, further comprising: means for determining whether the generation of a cardiac stimulation pulse successfully stimulates a response from the heart, means for temporarily suspending the operation of said ascertaining means for any cardiac cycle wherein the cardiac stimulation pulse fails to stimulate a response from the heart, and means for increasing the amplitude of the cardiac stimulation pulse when the cardiac stimulation pulse fails to stimulate a response from the heart over a plurality of consecutive cardiac cycles.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
47 words
A cardiac allograft rejection monitor in accordance with claim 1, wherein said generated cardiac stimulation pulses each cause a corresponding stimulation polarization artifact to be initiated, and further comprising: means for minimizing the stimulation polarization artifact that is initiated by the generation of a cardiac stimulation pulse.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
49 words
A cardiac allograft rejection monitor in accordance with claim 3, further comprising: means for determining when said minimizing means is incapable of minimizing the stimulation polarization artifact, and means for suspending the operation of said ascertaining means until said minimizing means becomes capable of minimizing the stimulation polarization artifact.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
123 words
A cardiac allograft rejection monitor in accordance with claim 1, wherein said generated cardiac stimulation pulses each cause a corresponding stimulation polarization artifact to be initiated, and further comprising: means for determining whether the generation of a cardiac stimulation pulse successfully stimulates a response from the heart, means for temporarily suspending the operation of said ascertaining means for any cardiac cycle wherein the cardiac stimulation pulse fails to stimulate a response from the heart, means for increasing the amplitude of the cardiac stimulation pulse when the cardiac stimulation pulse fails to stimulate a response from the heart over a plurality of consecutive cardiac cycles, and means for minimizing the stimulation polarization artifact that is initiated by the generation of a cardiac stimulation pulse.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
49 words
A cardiac allograft rejection monitor in accordance with claim 5, further comprising: means for determining when said minimizing means is incapable of minimizing the stimulation polarization artifact, and means for suspending the operation of said ascertaining means until said minimizing means becomes capable of minimizing the stimulation polarization artifact.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
34 words
A cardiac allograft rejection monitor in accordance with claim 1, further comprising: means for setting the sensitivity of said sensing means to a level preventing signal saturation while maximizing the stimulated cardiac depolarization signal.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
145 words
A cardiac allograft rejection monitor in accordance with claim 1, wherein said generated cardiac stimulation pulses each cause a corresponding stimulation polarization artifact to be initiated, and further comprising: means for setting the sensitivity of said sensing means to a level preventing signal saturation while maximizing the stimulated cardiac depolarization signal, means for determining whether the generation of a cardiac stimulation pulse successfully stimulates a response from the heart, means for temporarily suspending the operation of said ascertaining means for any cardiac cycle wherein the cardiac stimulation pulse fails to stimulate a response from the heart, means for increasing the amplitude of the cardiac stimulation pulse when the cardiac stimulation pulse fails to stimulate a response from the heart over a plurality of consecutive cardiac cycles, and means for minimizing the stimulation polarization artifact that is initiated by the generation of a cardiac stimulation pulse.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
74 words
A cardiac allograft rejection monitor in accordance with claim 8, wherein said means for periodically ascertaining the value of a measured allograft rejection control parameter further comprises: means for measuring the peak magnitude of the sensed stimulated cardiac depolarization signal, means for measuring the depolarization time duration from the onset to the end of the stimulated cardiac depolarization signal, and means for determining the ratio of said peak magnitude to said depolarization time duration.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
40 words
A cardiac allograft rejection monitor in accordance with claim 8, wherein said means for periodically ascertaining the value of a measured allograft rejection control parameter further comprises: means for deriving the integrated area of the sensed stimulated cardiac depolarization signal.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
84 words
A cardiac allograft rejection monitor in accordance with claim 8, wherein said sensing means further senses a repolarization signal in response to the generation of a cardiac stimulation pulse, wherein said means for periodically ascertaining the value of a measured allograft rejection control parameter is further based on an analysis of said sensed stimulated cardiac repolarization signal, and wherein said ascertaining means further comprises: means for deriving the integrated area of the combined sensed stimulated cardiac depolarization signal and sensed stimulated cardiac repolarization signal.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
74 words
A cardiac allograft rejection monitor in accordance with claim 1, wherein said means for periodically ascertaining the value of a measured allograft rejection control parameter further comprises: means for measuring the peak magnitude of the sensed stimulated cardiac depolarization signal, means for measuring the depolarization time duration from the onset to the end of the stimulated cardiac depolarization signal, and means for determining the ratio of said peak magnitude to said depolarization time duration.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
40 words
A cardiac allograft rejection monitor in accordance with claim 1, wherein said means for periodically ascertaining the value of a measured allograft rejection control parameter further comprises: means for deriving the integrated area of the sensed stimulated cardiac depolarization signal.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
84 words
A cardiac allograft rejection monitor in accordance with claim 1, wherein said sensing means further senses a repolarization signal in response to the generation of a cardiac stimulation pulse, wherein said means for periodically ascertaining the value of a measured allograft rejection control parameter is further based on an analysis of said sensed stimulated cardiac repolarization signal, and wherein said ascertaining means further comprises: means for deriving the integrated area of the combined sensed stimulated cardiac depolarization signal and sensed stimulated cardiac repolarization signal.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
61 words
A cardiac allograft rejection monitor in accordance with claim 1, for controlling the output of an implantable drug infusion pump, further comprising: means for deriving an infusion pump control parameter from changes in the measured allograft rejection control parameter over time, and means for controlling said implantable drug infusion pump based on a time value of the infusion pump control parameter.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
145 words
A cardiac allograft rejection monitor in accordance with claim 15, wherein said generated cardiac stimulation pulses each cause a corresponding stimulation polarization artifact to be initiated, and further comprising: means for setting the sensitivity of said sensing means to a level preventing signal saturation while maximizing the stimulated cardiac depolarization signal, means for determining whether the generation of a cardiac stimulation pulse successfully stimulates a response from the heart, means for temporarily suspending the operation of said ascertaining means for any cardiac cycle wherein the cardiac stimulation pulse fails to stimulate a response from the heart, means for increasing the amplitude of the cardiac stimulation pulse when the cardiac stimulation pulse fails to stimulate a response from the heart over a plurality of consecutive cardiac cycles, and means for minimizing the stimulation polarization artifact that is initiated by the generation of a cardiac stimulation pulse.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
74 words
A cardiac allograft rejection monitor in accordance with claim 16, wherein said means for periodically ascertaining the value of a measured allograft rejection control parameter further comprises: means for measuring the peak magnitude of the sensed stimulated cardiac depolarization signal, means for measuring the depolarization time duration from the onset to the end of the stimulated cardiac depolarization signal, and means for determining the ratio of said peak magnitude to said depolarization time duration.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
40 words
A cardiac allograft rejection monitor in accordance with claim 16, wherein said means for periodically ascertaining the value of a measured allograft rejection control parameter further comprises: means for deriving the integrated area of the sensed stimulated cardiac depolarization signal.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
84 words
A cardiac allograft rejection monitor in accordance with claim 16, wherein said sensing means further senses a re-polarization signal in response to the generation of a cardiac stimulation pulse, wherein said means for periodically ascertaining the value of a measured allograft rejection control parameter is further based on an analysis of said sensed stimulated cardiac repolarization signal, and wherein said ascertaining means further comprises: means for deriving the integrated area of the combined sensed stimulated cardiac depolarization signal and sensed stimulated cardiac repolarization signal.
Claim 21
Independent Claim
98 words
A method of monitoring cardiac allograft rejection from leads implanted in a patient's heart, comprising the steps of: generating cardiac stimulation pulses, sensing a stimulated cardiac depolarization signal in response to the generated cardiac stimulation pulse, periodically ascertaining the value of a measured allograft rejection control parameter which is based on an analysis of the sensed stimulated cardiac depolarization signal, detecting changes in the measured allograft rejection control parameter over time which are indicative of the occurrence of allograft rejection, and storing information indicative of the occurrence of allograft rejection and communicating the information to an external device.
Claim 22
Independent Claim
98 words
A method of monitoring cardiac allograft rejection from leads implanted in a patient's heart, comprising the steps of: generating cardiac stimulation pulses, sensing a stimulated cardiac depolarization signal in response to the generated cardiac stimulation pulse, periodically ascertaining the value of a measured allograft rejection control parameter which is based on an analysis of the sensed stimulated cardiac depolarization signal, detecting changes in the measured allograft rejection control parameter over time which are indicative of the occurrence of allograft rejection, and storing information indicative of the occurrence of allograft rejection and communicating the information to an external device.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
132 words
A method of monitoring cardiac allograft rejection in accordance with claim 20, wherein said generated cardiac stimulation pulses each cause a corresponding stimulation polarization artifact to be initiated, and further comprising the steps of: setting the sensitivity of said sensing step to a level preventing signal saturation while maximizing the stimulated cardiac depolarization signal, determining whether the generation of a cardiac stimulation pulse successfully stimulates a response from the heart, temporarily suspending the operation of said ascertaining step when cardiac stimulation pulses fail to stimulate responses from the heart, increasing the amplitude of cardiac stimulation pulses when the cardiac stimulation pulses fail to stimulate a response from the heart over a plurality of consecutive cardiac cycles, and minimizing the stimulation polarization artifact that is initiated by the generation of cardiac stimulation pulses.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
73 words
A method of monitoring cardiac allograft rejection in accordance with claim 21, wherein said step of periodically ascertaining the value of a measured allograft rejection control parameter further comprises the sub-steps of: measuring the peak magnitude of the sensed stimulated cardiac depolarization signal, measuring the depolarization time duration from the onset to the end of the stimulated cardiac depolarization signal, and determining the ratio of said peak magnitude to said depolarization time duration.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
43 words
A method of monitoring cardiac allograft rejection in accordance with claim 2-, wherein said step of periodically ascertaining the value of a measured allograft rejection control parameter further comprises the sub-step of: deriving the integrated area of the sensed stimulated cardiac depolarization signal.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
88 words
A method of monitoring cardiac allograft rejection in accordance with claim 21, wherein during said sensing step a stimulated repolarization signal is also sensed in response to the generated cardiac stimulation pulse, wherein said step of periodically ascertaining the value of a measured allograft rejection control parameter is further based on an analysis of said sensed stimulated cardiac repolarization signal, and wherein said ascertaining step further comprises the sub-step of: deriving the integrated area of the combined sensed stimulated cardiac depolarization signal and sensed stimulated cardiac repolarization signal.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1995-08-18 | 1996-02-17 | 1996-08-18 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1999-08-18 | 2000-02-17 | 2000-08-18 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2003-08-18 | 2004-02-17 | 2004-08-18 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |