US5128756A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
High definition television coding arrangement with graceful degradation
Assignee: Nokia Bell Labs
•
Filing: 1990-12-11
•
Granted: 1992-07-07
•
Expires: 2010-12-11
Abstract
Abstract Graceful degradation for digitally encoded HDTV signals is achieved by appropriately coding the image to provide a controllable degradation of chosen image characteristics, such as temporal degradation, spatial degradation, and dynamic range degradation. In the temporal degradation approach of this invention, the resolution of movement suffers when noise is introduced. In the spatial degradation approach, the spatial resolution of the image is sacrificed. In the range degradation approach, the dynamic range of the signals is sacrificed. The graceful degradation is achieved by dividing the transmitted signal into two or more parts, such as parts A, B and C. Part A is given the heaviest error-correcting code; part B is given a "medium" error correcting code; and part C the is given the least powerful error correcting code (or perhaps none at all). A receiver that is close to the transmitter most likely receives parts A, B and C. A receiver that is farther away gets a noisier signal might and, perhaps, correctly receive only parts A and B. A receiver that is at the limits of the transmitter range might receive correctly only part A. Of course, the signals of parts A, B and C are constructed in a hierarchical fashion so that part A provides basic signal information; part B augments the basic information to produce a better picture; and part C augments part A plus B to produce the highest resolution picture.
Inventors
- 👤 James D. Johnston
- 👤 Scott C. Knauer
- 👤 Kim N. Matthews
- 👤 Arun N. Netravali
- 👤 Eric D. Petajan
- 👤 Robert J. Safranek
- 👤 Peter H. Westerink
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-29 21:40
CPC Classifications
H; H04; H04N; H04N19/00; H04N19/85; H04N19/89; H04N19/895; H04N19/30; H04N19/37; H04N19/50; H04N19/60; H04N19/61
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 14
Claim 1
Independent Claim
96 words
An image signal encoder having means for encoding pixels of an image in a manner suitable for eventual transmission to a receiving apparatus, the improvement comprising: means for identifying at least two pixel information sets, with said identifying keyed to a measure of importance associated with the correct interpretation of said pixel information by said receiving apparatus; and means for coding the pixel information of each set in a manner related to the measure of importance associated with the correct interpretation of said pixel information by said receiving apparatus in the presence of transmission medium noise.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
96 words
An image signal encoder having means for encoding pixels of an image in a manner suitable for eventual transmission to a receiving apparatus, the improvement comprising: means for identifying at least two pixel information sets, with said identifying keyed to a measure of importance associated with the correct interpretation of said pixel information by said receiving apparatus; and means for coding the pixel information of each set in a manner related to the measure of importance associated with the correct interpretation of said pixel information by said receiving apparatus in the presence of transmission medium noise.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
72 words
The coder of claim 1 wherein the pixel information of a first set is encoded to yield a first level of confidence that the information will be correctly interpreted by said receiving apparatus, wherein the pixel information of a second set is encoded to yield a second level of confidence that the information will be correctly interpreted by said receiving apparatus, and wherein said first level is higher than said second level.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
58 words
The coder of claim 2 where codes used for encoding are from a set codes where some of said codes in said set are characterized by a lesser sensitivity to transmission medium noise than others of said codes in said set, and the codes with lesser sensitivity are used to encode the pixel information of said first set.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
32 words
The encoder of claim 3 where said codes that are characterized by a lesser sensitivity are codes that have a larger Hamming distance to other codes than said others of said codes.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
53 words
The coder of claim 2 where codes used for encoding information in said first set include one form of error correction codes and codes used in encoding information is said second set include another form of error correction codes, which said another form is less able to correct errors than said one form.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
23 words
The coder of claim 2 where the information identified for said first set is related to the spatial frequency content of the pixels.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
26 words
The coder of claim 2 where the information identified for said first set is related to the temporal change of the image from the previous image.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
21 words
The coder of claim 2 where the information identified for the first set is related to the color of the pixels.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
68 words
The encoder of claim 2 wherein said means for coding includes means for grouping image pixels, means for transforming said groups of pixels, and means for representing the transform of each group of pixels with a codebook vector identifier and a quantized information packet having cells that represent different frequency components; and said means for identifying selects frequency components lower than a preselected threshold for said first set.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
73 words
The encoder of claim 2 wherein said means for coding includes means for grouping image pixels, means for transforming said groups of pixels, and means for representing the transform of each group of pixels with a codebook vector identifier and a quantized information packet having cells that represent different frequency components; and said means for identifying selects quantized information packets where frequency components lower than a preselected threshold predominate for said first set.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
20 words
The encoder of claim 1 where said measure of importance is keyed to the ability of the human visual system.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
106 words
An image signal encoder having means for encoding pixels of an image, the improvement comprising: means for grouping said pixels of an image in groups of one or more pixels, means for separating said groups into two sets, with the groups in one set being of the type that is more important to correctly interpret in a receiver and the groups in the other set being of the type that is less important to correctly interpret in the receiver; and means for coding the groups of each set in a manner related to the importance associated with the correct interpretation of a group in the receiver.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
106 words
An image signal encoder having means for encoding pixels of an image, the improvement comprising: means for grouping said pixels of an image in groups of one or more pixels, means for separating said groups into two sets, with the groups in one set being of the type that is more important to correctly interpret in a receiver and the groups in the other set being of the type that is less important to correctly interpret in the receiver; and means for coding the groups of each set in a manner related to the importance associated with the correct interpretation of a group in the receiver.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4567518A
Cited
US4729021A
Cited
US4780761A
Cited
US4791654A
Cited
US4984076A
Cited
US5036392A
Cited
US5006929A
Cited
US5040062A
Cited
US5043808A
Cited
US5063444A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1995-07-07 | 1996-01-06 | 1996-07-07 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1999-07-07 | 2000-01-06 | 2000-07-07 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2003-07-07 | 2004-01-06 | 2004-07-07 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |