US5126744A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Beacon and mode-4 defruiter
Assignee: Westinghouse Electric Corp
•
Filing: 1991-01-31
•
Granted: 1992-06-30
•
Expires: 2011-01-31
Abstract
Abstract A defruiter for filtering fruit replies from a reply data signal in a radar system. The defruiter includes a window memory, a main memory, a counter and a main defruiter. Another version of the defruiter includes the items listed above and, additonally, a data memory and a buffer. The window memory stores reply data for a number of range intervals and a number of pulse repetition times. The main memory provides and receives reply data to and from, respectively, the window memory. The counter determines the number of replies occurring in a number of range intervals and a number of pulse repetition times. The main defruiter allows reply data to be provided to a data processor of the radar system when a reply occurs in the center part of the window memory and when the number of replies determined by the counter is greater than or equal to a window parameter. The number of fruit replies occuring within the reply data supplied to the data processor of the radar system is therefore reduced. The defruiter also provides near miss processing capability is mode-4 for filtering fruit near miss replies from a reply data signal.
Inventors
- 👤 Harry S. Goedeke
- 👤 Elbert L. Cole, Jr.
- 👤 Michael J. Ransford
- 👤 Steven D. Mirra
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-01 18:48
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01S; G01S13/00; G01S13/74; G01S13/76; G01S13/78; G01S13/781; G01S13/784
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 25
Claim 1
Independent Claim
97 words
Apparatus for filtering fruit replies from a reply data signal in a radar system, comprising: means for summing a number of replies occurring in first selected range intervals and first selected pulse repetition times of the reply data signal to provide a first result; means for determining whether the first result is greater than or equal to a window parameter to provide a second result; and means for outputting a defruited data signal corresponding to a second selected range interval and a second selected pulse repetition time of the reply data signal, based on the second result.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
97 words
Apparatus for filtering fruit replies from a reply data signal in a radar system, comprising: means for summing a number of replies occurring in first selected range intervals and first selected pulse repetition times of the reply data signal to provide a first result; means for determining whether the first result is greater than or equal to a window parameter to provide a second result; and means for outputting a defruited data signal corresponding to a second selected range interval and a second selected pulse repetition time of the reply data signal, based on the second result.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
41 words
Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said apparatus further comprises: means for modifying a reply data included within the reply data signal, corresponding to the second selected range interval and the second pulse repetition time, based on the second result.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
64 words
Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said apparatus further comprises: means for determining whether a reply occurred in the second selected range interval and the second selected pulse repetition time to provide a third result, and for initiating the determining by said means for determining whether the first result is greater than or equal to the window parameter, based on the third result.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
34 words
Apparatus as claimed in claimed in claim 1, wherein said means for summing the number of replies uses three successive range intervals occurring in the reply data signal as the first selected range intervals.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
50 words
Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said means for summing the number of replies uses six pulse repetition times occurring immediately after the second selected pulse repetition time, and seven pulse repetition times occurring immediately before the second selected pulse repetition time as the first selected pulse repetition times.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
49 words
Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said means for summing the number of replies uses five pulse repetition times occurring after the second selected pulse repetition time, and seven pulse repetition times occurring immediately before the second selected pulse repetition time as the first selected pulse repetition times.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
27 words
Apparatus as claimed in claim 1, further comprising: means for determining whether said means for outputting the defruited data signal is operating in accordance with predetermined criteria.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
181 words
Apparatus for filtering fruit replies from a reply data signal in a radar system, comprising: means for determining whether a reply occurred in a first selected range interval and first selected pulse repetition times to provide a first result indicative of a potential near miss reply; means for receiving a second result indicative of whether a reply occurred in a second selected range interval and a second selected pulse repetition time based on the first result; means for terminating processing of the potential near miss reply and waiting a first selected number of pulse repetition times based on the second result; means for waiting a second selected number of pulse repetition times and for summing a number of replies occurring in third selected range intervals and third selected pulse repetition times to provide a third result, based on the second result; means for determining whether the third result is greater than or equal to a third selected number to provide a fourth result; and means for outputting a defruited data signal based on the reply data signal and the fourth result.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
181 words
Apparatus for filtering fruit replies from a reply data signal in a radar system, comprising: means for determining whether a reply occurred in a first selected range interval and first selected pulse repetition times to provide a first result indicative of a potential near miss reply; means for receiving a second result indicative of whether a reply occurred in a second selected range interval and a second selected pulse repetition time based on the first result; means for terminating processing of the potential near miss reply and waiting a first selected number of pulse repetition times based on the second result; means for waiting a second selected number of pulse repetition times and for summing a number of replies occurring in third selected range intervals and third selected pulse repetition times to provide a third result, based on the second result; means for determining whether the third result is greater than or equal to a third selected number to provide a fourth result; and means for outputting a defruited data signal based on the reply data signal and the fourth result.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
42 words
Apparatus as claimed in claim 8, wherein said apparatus further comprises: means for modifying a reply data included within the reply data signal, corresponding to a fourth selected range interval and a fourth selected pulse repetition time, based on the fourth result.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
34 words
Apparatus as claimed in claim 8, wherein said means for determining whether a reply occurred uses seven pulse repetition times occurring after a current pulse repetition time as the first selected pulse repetition times.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
27 words
Apparatus as claimed in claim 8, wherein said means for receiving the second result uses a current pulse repetition time as the second selected pulse repetition time.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
54 words
Apparatus as claimed in claim 9, wherein said means for waiting uses three successive range intervals in the reply data signal as the third selected range intervals, and wherein said means for waiting uses seven pulse repetition times occurring immediately before the fourth selected pulse repetition time as the third selected pulse repetition times.
Claim 15
Independent Claim
106 words
A method for filtering fruit replies from a reply data signal in a radar system, comprising the steps of: a) summing a number of replies occurring in first selected range intervals and first selected pulse repetition times of the reply data signal to provide a first result; b) determining whether the first result of said step (a) is greater than or equal to a window parameter to provide a second result; and c) outputting a defruited data signal corresponding to a second selected range interval and a second selected pulse repetition time of the reply data signal, based on the second result of said step (b).
Claim 16
Independent Claim
106 words
A method for filtering fruit replies from a reply data signal in a radar system, comprising the steps of: a) summing a number of replies occurring in first selected range intervals and first selected pulse repetition times of the reply data signal to provide a first result; b) determining whether the first result of said step (a) is greater than or equal to a window parameter to provide a second result; and c) outputting a defruited data signal corresponding to a second selected range interval and a second selected pulse repetition time of the reply data signal, based on the second result of said step (b).
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
45 words
A method as claimed in claim 13, further comprising the step of: d) modifying reply data included within the reply data signal, corresponding to the second selected range interval and the second selected pulse repetition time, based on the second result of said step (b).
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
40 words
A method as claimed in claim 13, further comprising the steps of: d) initiating said step (b) when a reply corresponding to the second selected range interval and the second selected pulse repetition time occurs in the reply data signal.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
29 words
A method as claimed in claim 13, wherein said step (a) comprises using three successive range intervals occurring in the reply data signal as the first selected range intervals.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
45 words
A method as claimed in claim 13, wherein said step (a) comprises using six pulse repetition times occurring after the second selected pulse repetition time, and seven pulse repetition times occurring before the second selected pulse repetition time as the first selected pulse repetition times.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
45 words
A method as claimed in claim 13, wherein said step (a) comprises using five pulse repetition times occurring after the second selected pulse repetition time, and seven pulse repetition times occurring before the second selected pulse repetition time as the first selected pulse repetition times.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
150 words
Apparatus for filtering fruit replies from a reply data signal in a radar system, comprising: means for summing a number of replies occurring in first selected range intervals and first selected pulse repetition times of the reply data signal to provide a first result; means for determining whether the first result is greater than or equal to a window parameter to provide a second result; means for outputting a defruited data signal corresponding to a second selected range interval and a second selected pulse repetition time of the reply data signal, based on the second result; and means for determining whether a reply occurred in the second selected range interval and the second selected pulse repetition time to provide a third result, and for initiating the determining by said means for determining whether the first result is greater than or equal to the window parameter, based on the third result.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
150 words
Apparatus for filtering fruit replies from a reply data signal in a radar system, comprising: means for summing a number of replies occurring in first selected range intervals and first selected pulse repetition times of the reply data signal to provide a first result; means for determining whether the first result is greater than or equal to a window parameter to provide a second result; means for outputting a defruited data signal corresponding to a second selected range interval and a second selected pulse repetition time of the reply data signal, based on the second result; and means for determining whether a reply occurred in the second selected range interval and the second selected pulse repetition time to provide a third result, and for initiating the determining by said means for determining whether the first result is greater than or equal to the window parameter, based on the third result.
Claim 24
Independent Claim
135 words
A method for filtering fruit replies from a reply data signal in a radar system, comprising the steps of: 1) summing a number of replies occurring in a first selected range intervals and first selected pulse repetition times of the replay data signal to provide a first result; b) determining whether the first result of said step (a) is greater than or equal to a window parameter to provide a second result; c) outputting a defruited data signal corresponding to a second selected range interval and a second selected pulse repetition time of the replay data signal, based on the second result of said step (b); and d) initiating said step (b) when a reply corresponding to the second selected range interval and the second selected pulse repetition time occurs in the reply data signal.
Claim 25
Independent Claim
135 words
A method for filtering fruit replies from a reply data signal in a radar system, comprising the steps of: 1) summing a number of replies occurring in a first selected range intervals and first selected pulse repetition times of the replay data signal to provide a first result; b) determining whether the first result of said step (a) is greater than or equal to a window parameter to provide a second result; c) outputting a defruited data signal corresponding to a second selected range interval and a second selected pulse repetition time of the replay data signal, based on the second result of said step (b); and d) initiating said step (b) when a reply corresponding to the second selected range interval and the second selected pulse repetition time occurs in the reply data signal.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4896158A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1995-06-30 | 1995-12-30 | 1996-06-30 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1999-06-30 | 1999-12-30 | 2000-06-30 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2003-06-30 | 2003-12-30 | 2004-06-30 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |