US5122966A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Computer generated tool path interference check method
Assignee: Ingersoll Rand Co
•
Filing: 1989-09-18
•
Granted: 1992-06-16
•
Expires: 2009-09-18
Abstract
Abstract A computer generated tool path interference check including a method of checking for interference between a workpiece and a cutting tool during the numerical control machining of the workpiece by the cutter tool. Computer simulation is utilized to determine at least a portion of the workpiece that is desired to be checked for possible interference with the path of the cutter tool. The spatial relationship between the workpiece and the cutter tool during the machining are modelled as the relative positioning of the computerized images of the portion of the workpiece and the cutter tool, respectively. The relative positioning of the computerized images of the portion of the workpiece and the cutter tool are observed to check whether an interference will occur between the workpiece and the cutter tool during the machining.
Inventors
- 👤 Willem Jansen
- 👤 Alan R. Levine
- 👤 Melvin Platt
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-05 00:57
CPC Classifications
G; G05; G05B; G05B19/00; G05B19/02; G05B19/18; G05B19/406; G05B19/4061; G05B19/4069
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 11
Claim 1
Independent Claim
219 words
A method of checking for interference between a workpiece and a tool prior to an anticipated machining process utilizing computer graphic simulation involving the steps of: determining at least a portion of the workpiece that is desired to be checked for possible interference with the tool; creating a computerized image of the portion of the workpiece after the anticipated machining process; creating a computerized image of the tool; modelling a spatial relationship between the computerized images of the portion of the workpiece and the portion of the tool during the anticipated machining process by displaying relative positioning of the computerized images of the portion of the workpiece and the tool, respectively; observing the relative positioning of the computerized images of the portion of the workpiece and the tool to determine whether an interference occurs between the workpiece and the tool during the anticipated machining process in a first plane; and observing the relative positioning of the computerized images of the portion of the workpiece and the tool to determine whether an interference occurs between the workpiece and the tool during the anticipated machining process in a second plane, said second plane being distinct from said first plane; the computerized tool image being observed at a stationary position, and the workpiece image being animated to move relative to the tool.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
219 words
A method of checking for interference between a workpiece and a tool prior to an anticipated machining process utilizing computer graphic simulation involving the steps of: determining at least a portion of the workpiece that is desired to be checked for possible interference with the tool; creating a computerized image of the portion of the workpiece after the anticipated machining process; creating a computerized image of the tool; modelling a spatial relationship between the computerized images of the portion of the workpiece and the portion of the tool during the anticipated machining process by displaying relative positioning of the computerized images of the portion of the workpiece and the tool, respectively; observing the relative positioning of the computerized images of the portion of the workpiece and the tool to determine whether an interference occurs between the workpiece and the tool during the anticipated machining process in a first plane; and observing the relative positioning of the computerized images of the portion of the workpiece and the tool to determine whether an interference occurs between the workpiece and the tool during the anticipated machining process in a second plane, said second plane being distinct from said first plane; the computerized tool image being observed at a stationary position, and the workpiece image being animated to move relative to the tool.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of interference checking as described in claim 1, wherein which the computer graphic stimulation is accomplished by a CAD/CAM system.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of interference checking as described in claim 1, wherein the computerized image of the workpiece is derived from a computer instruction input used in forming the workpiece.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of interference checking as described in claim 1, wherein the observing of the relative positioning of the images of the tool and the workpiece are viewed from a two dimensional view.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of interference checking as described in claim 1, wherein the first plane and the second plane are not parallel to each other.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
249 words
A method of checking for interference between a workpiece and a tool prior to an anticipated machining process, the anticipated machining process comprising a set of computer instructions, the method of checking for interference utilizing computer graphic simulation involving the steps of: determining at least a portion of the workpiece that is desired to be checked for possible interference with the tool; creating a computerized image of the portion of the workpiece after the anticipated machining process; creating a computerized image of the tool; modelling a spatial relationship between the computerized images of the portion of the workpiece and the portion of the tool during the anticipated machining process by displaying relative positioning of the computerized images of the portion of the workpiece and the tool, respectively; observing the relative positioning of the computerized images of the portion of the workpiece and the tool to determine whether an interference occurs between the workpiece and the tool during the anticipated machining process in a first plane; observing the relative positioning of the computerized images of the portion of the workpiece and the tool to determine whether an interference occurs between the workpiece and the tool during the anticipated machining process in a second plane said second plane being distinct from said first plane; and revising the computer instruction set used in forming the workpiece based upon said interference; the computerized tool image being observed at a stationary position, and the workpiece image being animated to move relative to the tool.
Claim 8
Independent Claim
249 words
A method of checking for interference between a workpiece and a tool prior to an anticipated machining process, the anticipated machining process comprising a set of computer instructions, the method of checking for interference utilizing computer graphic simulation involving the steps of: determining at least a portion of the workpiece that is desired to be checked for possible interference with the tool; creating a computerized image of the portion of the workpiece after the anticipated machining process; creating a computerized image of the tool; modelling a spatial relationship between the computerized images of the portion of the workpiece and the portion of the tool during the anticipated machining process by displaying relative positioning of the computerized images of the portion of the workpiece and the tool, respectively; observing the relative positioning of the computerized images of the portion of the workpiece and the tool to determine whether an interference occurs between the workpiece and the tool during the anticipated machining process in a first plane; observing the relative positioning of the computerized images of the portion of the workpiece and the tool to determine whether an interference occurs between the workpiece and the tool during the anticipated machining process in a second plane said second plane being distinct from said first plane; and revising the computer instruction set used in forming the workpiece based upon said interference; the computerized tool image being observed at a stationary position, and the workpiece image being animated to move relative to the tool.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of interference checking as described in claim 6, wherein which the computer graphic simulation is accomplished by a CAD/CAM system.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method of interference checking as described in claim 6, wherein the observing of the relative positioning of the images of the tool and the workpiece are viewed from a two dimensional view.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of interference checking as described in claim 6, wherein the first plane and the second plane are not parallel to each other.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4513366A
Cited
US4489377A
Cited
US4720796A
Cited
US4633409A
Cited
US4791579A
Cited
US4721952A
Cited
US4649498A
Cited
US4731607A
Cited
US4821201A
Cited
US4788481A
Cited
US4758961A
Cited
US4979128A
Cited
US4888707A
Cited
US4916990A
Cited
US4994977A
Cited
US4951217A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1995-06-16 | 1995-12-16 | 1996-06-16 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1999-06-16 | 1999-12-16 | 2000-06-16 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2003-06-16 | 2003-12-16 | 2004-06-16 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |