US5121125A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Optimum matched illumination waveform design process
Assignee: Grumman Corp
•
Filing: 1991-01-18
•
Granted: 1992-06-09
•
Expires: 2011-01-18
Abstract
Abstract An optimized theoretical approach to the design of a waveform for a matched illumination-reception radar system incorporates radar cross section codes along with detailed target geometry and system constrains to maximize the signal energy of a received echo. An Eigensystem is used to generate a family of solutions, one of which is chosen based upon system constraints to optimize the waveform.
Inventors
- 👤 Joseph R. Guerci
- 👤 Philip G. Grieve
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 10:05
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01S; G01S7/00; G01S7/02; G01S7/41; G01S7/411; G01S7/412
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 6
Claim 1
Independent Claim
151 words
A method for designing a matched illumination radar waveform for use in a radar system, comprising the steps of: (a) selecting a target; (b) generating a geometrical model of the target; (c) predicting an impulse response of the target for a transmitted matched illumination radar waveform; (d) deriving from the impulse response an autocorrelation function for the target in order to predict the echo energy of the transmitted matched illumination radar waveform upon interaction with the target; (e) deriving a set of solutions to an Eigensystem equation for the autocorrelation function; (f) testing the solution to obtain a subset of solutions which satisfies constraints on generation of waveforms by said radar system; and (g) choosing a solution from said subset of solutions which has a minimum Eigenvalue, the resulting chosen solution thereby having a maximum echo energy and minimum signal-to-noise ratio for the selected target, while still satisfying said system constraints.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
151 words
A method for designing a matched illumination radar waveform for use in a radar system, comprising the steps of: (a) selecting a target; (b) generating a geometrical model of the target; (c) predicting an impulse response of the target for a transmitted matched illumination radar waveform; (d) deriving from the impulse response an autocorrelation function for the target in order to predict the echo energy of the transmitted matched illumination radar waveform upon interaction with the target; (e) deriving a set of solutions to an Eigensystem equation for the autocorrelation function; (f) testing the solution to obtain a subset of solutions which satisfies constraints on generation of waveforms by said radar system; and (g) choosing a solution from said subset of solutions which has a minimum Eigenvalue, the resulting chosen solution thereby having a maximum echo energy and minimum signal-to-noise ratio for the selected target, while still satisfying said system constraints.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
34 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein step (c) comprises the step of applying radar cross-section prediction codes to the geometrical model of the target to predict the impulse response of the target.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
59 words
A method as claimed in claim 2, wherein step (c) further comprises the step of incorporating into the prediction of the autocorrelation function additional factors including polarization of a waveform by the target, bandwidth limitations of the system, expected angle variations of the target during an observation time interval, and the presence in the target of inhomogeneous radar-absorbing coatings.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
31 words
A method as claimed in claim 3, further comprising the step of collecting intelligence data in order to obtain geometrical data and data on said additional factors for the selected target.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
43 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein step (f) comprises the step of specifying system constraints including range resolution, clutter rejection, and economic considerations, and determining which of the waveforms given by the Eigensystem solutions can be generated within the specified constraints.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1995-06-09 | 1995-12-09 | 1996-06-09 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1999-06-09 | 1999-12-09 | 2000-06-09 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2003-06-09 | 2003-12-09 | 2004-06-09 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |