US5117236A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Antenna pattern selection for optimized communications
Assignee: Motorola Solutions Inc
•
Filing: 1990-10-19
•
Granted: 1992-05-26
•
Expires: 2010-10-19
Abstract
Abstract An antenna selection technique is used in an RF communication system in which user modules (UM) communicate with at least one node. The UM's and nodes each have multiple antennae. The combination of each UM and node antenna is evaluated at the UM. Based on both signal quality and strength, the UM selects its antenna and the best node antenna for use.
Inventors
- 👤 Hungkun J. Chang
- 👤 William K. Doss
- 👤 Michael P. Nolan
- 👤 Dale R. Buchholz
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-01 22:17
CPC Classifications
H; H04; H04B; H04B7/00; H04B7/02; H04B7/04; H04B7/08; H04B7/0868; H04B7/088; H04W; H04W16/00; H04W16/24
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 17
Claim 1
Independent Claim
189 words
A remote communications device capable of RF communication with a node comprising: means coupled to said remote device for selecting an antenna pattern from a plurality of directional antenna patterns that cover different geographic areas relative to the remote device; means for determining the quality ( Q ) of signals received from the node on each of said antenna patterns; means for determining the signal strength of (S) of signals received from the node on each of said antenna patterns; means for ranking each of said antenna patterns according to R=(q* Q )+(s*S), where R is the rank, q and s are numerical weighting factors, wherein q>0 and s>0 and q>10*S, whereby the quality of the received signal is given greater weight than the signal strength; and means for generating a historical average rank for each of said antenna patterns according to HRnew=(k*HRold)+((1-k)*R), where HRnew is the new historical average rank, HRold is the last calculated historical rank, and R is the rank for the antenna pattern, and 1>k>0; said selecting means selecting the antenna pattern for use in communicating with the node based upon said historical average rankings.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
189 words
A remote communications device capable of RF communication with a node comprising: means coupled to said remote device for selecting an antenna pattern from a plurality of directional antenna patterns that cover different geographic areas relative to the remote device; means for determining the quality ( Q ) of signals received from the node on each of said antenna patterns; means for determining the signal strength of (S) of signals received from the node on each of said antenna patterns; means for ranking each of said antenna patterns according to R=(q* Q )+(s*S), where R is the rank, q and s are numerical weighting factors, wherein q>0 and s>0 and q>10*S, whereby the quality of the received signal is given greater weight than the signal strength; and means for generating a historical average rank for each of said antenna patterns according to HRnew=(k*HRold)+((1-k)*R), where HRnew is the new historical average rank, HRold is the last calculated historical rank, and R is the rank for the antenna pattern, and 1>k>0; said selecting means selecting the antenna pattern for use in communicating with the node based upon said historical average rankings.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
25 words
The remote device according to claim 1 wherein k>0.5 thereby giving greater weight to the historical ranking and reducing the impact of each new ranking.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
25 words
The remote device according to claim 1 wherein k>0.9 thereby giving greater weight to the historical ranking and reducing the impact of each new ranking.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
26 words
The remote device according to claim 1 further comprising means for periodically generating new rankings R based on new determinations of quality (Q) and strength (S).
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
164 words
A radio frequency (RF) communications system including a node and at least one remote device capable of RF communication with the node comprising: means coupled to the remote device (RM) for selecting an RM antenna pattern from a plurality of directional antenna patterns that cover different geographic areas relative to the RM; means coupled to the node for selecting a node antenna pattern from a plurality of directional antenna patterns that cover different geographic areas relative to the node; means for generating a matrix of rankings of each remote device antenna pattern for each node antenna pattern based on signals communicated between the remote device and node, said rankings of remote device and node antenna patterns constituting rows and columns, respectively, in said matrix; means for summing the rankings in each column in said matrix to generate column summations; said node antenna pattern selecting means selecting the node antenna pattern corresponding to the larges column summation for use in communications with said remote device.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
164 words
A radio frequency (RF) communications system including a node and at least one remote device capable of RF communication with the node comprising: means coupled to the remote device (RM) for selecting an RM antenna pattern from a plurality of directional antenna patterns that cover different geographic areas relative to the RM; means coupled to the node for selecting a node antenna pattern from a plurality of directional antenna patterns that cover different geographic areas relative to the node; means for generating a matrix of rankings of each remote device antenna pattern for each node antenna pattern based on signals communicated between the remote device and node, said rankings of remote device and node antenna patterns constituting rows and columns, respectively, in said matrix; means for summing the rankings in each column in said matrix to generate column summations; said node antenna pattern selecting means selecting the node antenna pattern corresponding to the larges column summation for use in communications with said remote device.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
82 words
The system according to claim 5 wherein said means for generating a matrix of rankings includes: means for determining the quality (Q) of signals received from each node antenna pattern on each of said device antenna patterns; means for determining the strength (S) of the signals received from each node antenna pattern on each of said device antenna patterns; means for ranking each combination of antenna patterns according to R=(q*Q)+(s*S) where R is the rank, q and s are numerical weighting factors.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
77 words
The system according to claim 6 further comprising means for generating a historical average rank for each of said antenna patterns according to HR new =(k*HR old )+((1-k)*R), where HR new is the new historical average rank, HR old is the last calculated historical rank, and R is the rank for an antenna pattern, and 1>k>0, said device selecting means selecting the antenna pattern for use in communicating with the node based on said historical average rank.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
30 words
The system according to claim 6 wherein q>0 and s>0, and q>10*s, whereby the quality of the received signal is given substantially greater weight than the strength of the signal.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
24 words
The system according to claim 7 wherein k>0.5 thereby giving greater weight to the historical ranking and reducing the impact of each new ranking.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
24 words
The system according to claim 7 wherein k>0.9 thereby giving greater weight to the historical ranking and reducing the impact of each new ranking.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
29 words
The system according to claim 6 further comprising means for periodically generating new rankings R based on new determinations of quality (Q) and strength (S) for each matrix combination.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
49 words
The system according to claim 5 further comprising said generating means and summing means both being part of said remote device, and means associated with said remote device means for transmitting a command to the node defining the node antenna pattern to use for communications with the remote device.
Claim 15
Independent Claim
195 words
A method for choosing one antenna pattern from among a plurality of antenna patterns coupled to a remote communications device capable of RF communication with a node comprising: selecting an antenna pattern from a plurality of directional antenna patterns that cover different geographic areas relative to the remote device; determining the quality ( Q ) of the signals received from the node on each of said antenna patterns; determining the signal strength (S) of the signals received from the node on each of said antenna patterns; ranking each of said antenna patterns according to R=(q* Q )+(s*S), where R is the rank, q and s are numerical weighting factors, wherein q>0 and s>0 and q>10*S, whereby the quality of the received signal is given greater weight than the signal strength; generating a historical average rank for each of said antenna patterns according to HRnew=(k*HRold)+((1-k)*R), where HRnew is the new historical average rank, HRold is the last calculated historical rank, and R is the rank for the antenna pattern, and k is a weighting factor where 1>k>0; and selecting the antenna pattern for use in communicating with the node based on the highest historical average rankings.
Claim 16
Independent Claim
195 words
A method for choosing one antenna pattern from among a plurality of antenna patterns coupled to a remote communications device capable of RF communication with a node comprising: selecting an antenna pattern from a plurality of directional antenna patterns that cover different geographic areas relative to the remote device; determining the quality ( Q ) of the signals received from the node on each of said antenna patterns; determining the signal strength (S) of the signals received from the node on each of said antenna patterns; ranking each of said antenna patterns according to R=(q* Q )+(s*S), where R is the rank, q and s are numerical weighting factors, wherein q>0 and s>0 and q>10*S, whereby the quality of the received signal is given greater weight than the signal strength; generating a historical average rank for each of said antenna patterns according to HRnew=(k*HRold)+((1-k)*R), where HRnew is the new historical average rank, HRold is the last calculated historical rank, and R is the rank for the antenna pattern, and k is a weighting factor where 1>k>0; and selecting the antenna pattern for use in communicating with the node based on the highest historical average rankings.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method according to claim 13 wherein k>0.5 thereby giving greater weight to the historical ranking and reducing the impact of each new ranking.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1995-05-26 | 1995-11-25 | 1996-05-26 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1999-05-26 | 1999-11-25 | 2000-05-26 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2003-05-26 | 2003-11-25 | 2004-05-26 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |