US5105356A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for curve correlation
Assignee: Mobil Oil AS
•
Filing: 1989-07-14
•
Granted: 1992-04-14
•
Expires: 2009-07-14
Abstract
Abstract The maximum correlation between a pair of curves is determined from the maximum value of the common area of such curves with respect to reference lines within a select window as one of the curves is moved through the window while the other of the curves remains fixed within the window.
Inventors
- 👤 Robert E. Maute
- 👤 F. Fay Osborn
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 00:36
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01V; G01V1/00; G01V1/40; G01V1/44; G01V3/00; G01V3/18
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 16
Claim 1
Independent Claim
369 words
A method for generating a geophysical dipmeter log of a subsurface formation surrounding a borehole, comprising the steps of: a) lowering a dipmeter logging tool having at least three geophysical sensors at angular positions displaced from the longitudinal axis of said tool and equally spaced apart around said axis to an initial borehole depth within said borehole, b) positioning each of said sensors against the wall of said borehole, each of said sensors producing a signal which changes in accordance with a geophysical property change of said formations, c) traversing said logging tool through an initial borehole depth interval, d) recording changes in said geophysical property in correlation with depth, e) selecting a first window along a first geophysical recording for said initial borehole interval, f) selecting a second window along a second geophysical recording for said initial borehole interval, g) determining a first reference line along said first geophysical recording within said first window representing a first amplitude position along said first geophysical recording, h) determining a second reference line along said second geophysical recording within said second window representing a second amplitude position along said second geophysical recording, i) offsetting one of said geophysical recordings in amplitude with respect to the other of said geophysical recordings such that said first and second reference lines coincide, j) determining common areas of said geophysical recordings with coinciding reference lines, k) incrementally shifting said first geophysical recordings through said first window and repeating steps (e)-(j) following each incremental shift, l) comparing the common areas of said geophysical recordings determined in steps (i) and (j) following each of said incremental shifts to identify a maximum value for said common areas, m) determining the maximum correlation of said first and second geophysical recordings from positions of said geophysical recordings within said first and second windows yielding the maximum value of said common areas. n) traversing said logging tool through a plurality of borehole depth intervals along said borehole, o) repeating steps (d)-(m) for each of said plurality of depth intervals as said logging tool traverses said borehole, and p) generating a dipmeter log representative of the dip of said subsurface formation with depth from said determined maximum correlations of said geophysical recordings.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
369 words
A method for generating a geophysical dipmeter log of a subsurface formation surrounding a borehole, comprising the steps of: a) lowering a dipmeter logging tool having at least three geophysical sensors at angular positions displaced from the longitudinal axis of said tool and equally spaced apart around said axis to an initial borehole depth within said borehole, b) positioning each of said sensors against the wall of said borehole, each of said sensors producing a signal which changes in accordance with a geophysical property change of said formations, c) traversing said logging tool through an initial borehole depth interval, d) recording changes in said geophysical property in correlation with depth, e) selecting a first window along a first geophysical recording for said initial borehole interval, f) selecting a second window along a second geophysical recording for said initial borehole interval, g) determining a first reference line along said first geophysical recording within said first window representing a first amplitude position along said first geophysical recording, h) determining a second reference line along said second geophysical recording within said second window representing a second amplitude position along said second geophysical recording, i) offsetting one of said geophysical recordings in amplitude with respect to the other of said geophysical recordings such that said first and second reference lines coincide, j) determining common areas of said geophysical recordings with coinciding reference lines, k) incrementally shifting said first geophysical recordings through said first window and repeating steps (e)-(j) following each incremental shift, l) comparing the common areas of said geophysical recordings determined in steps (i) and (j) following each of said incremental shifts to identify a maximum value for said common areas, m) determining the maximum correlation of said first and second geophysical recordings from positions of said geophysical recordings within said first and second windows yielding the maximum value of said common areas. n) traversing said logging tool through a plurality of borehole depth intervals along said borehole, o) repeating steps (d)-(m) for each of said plurality of depth intervals as said logging tool traverses said borehole, and p) generating a dipmeter log representative of the dip of said subsurface formation with depth from said determined maximum correlations of said geophysical recordings.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
71 words
The method of claim 1 wherein: a. the area of said first geophysical recording above said first reference line within said first window is equal to the area of said first geophysical recording below said first reference line; and b. the area of said second geophysical recording above said second reference line within said second window is equal to the area of said second geophysical recording below said second reference line.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said first and second reference lines are determined by taking arithmetic averages of said first and second geophysical recordings respectively.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
56 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the common areas of said geophysical recording having coinciding reference lines are determined by identifying an area bounded by said first geophysical recording, said first reference line and said first window which coincides with an area bounded by said second geophysical recording, said second reference line and said second window.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
69 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said step of determining the common area of said geophysical recordings with coinciding reference lines is carried out in accordance with the following expression: ##EQU1## where x=amplitude values of said first geophysical recording, z=amplitude values of said second geophysical recording, x=arithmetic average of said first geophysical recording over said first window, and z=arithmetic average of said second geophysical recording over said second window.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 5 further comprising the step of adding zero into the summation expression for common area if: SIGN(z-z)≠SIGN(x-z).
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 1 wherein one of said geophysical recordings is fixed during steps d and f while the other of said geophysical recordings is moved both in offset in step d and incrementally in step f.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of incrementally shifting at least one of said windows and repeating steps b through h for each incremental shift.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method of claim 8 further comprising the step of utilizing the shift of said one of said geophysical recordings identifying said maximum correlation within each shift of said window to determine the dip of the subsurface formations surrounding the borehole.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said first and second geophysical recordings represent log data acquired from differing sides of a borehole during a microresistivity survey of subsurface formations surrounding said borehole and said windows represent borehole depth intervals.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said windows are selected to represent identical borehole depth intervals.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said windows are selected to represent differing borehole depth intervals.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 12 wherein said windows are selected such that at least a portion of each of said differing borehole depth intervals coincide.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said selected borehole depth intervals are in the order of four feet.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 1 wherein each incremental shift of said windows advances borehole depth intervals represented by said windows in the order of two feet.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4453219A
Cited
US4223399A
Cited
US4383220A
Cited
US4683552A
Cited
US4517835A
Cited
US4541275A
Cited
US4578645A
Cited
US4581584A
Cited
US4600887A
Cited
US4683556A
Cited
US4939649A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1995-04-14 | 1995-10-14 | 1996-04-14 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1999-04-14 | 1999-10-14 | 2000-04-14 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2003-04-14 | 2003-10-14 | 2004-04-14 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |