← Back to Patent Explorer
US5095745A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Method and apparatus for testing subsurface formations

Assignee: LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL COLLEGE OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER
•
Filing: 1990-06-15
•
Granted: 1992-03-17
•
Expires: 2010-06-15
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A method and apparatus for testing subsurface formations, particularly a formation having a permeability less than about 10 millidarcies is disclosed. The test is made by use of a down hole test tool designed in such a way as to control the decompression of the fluid as it enters the tool. The formation characteristics are determined by analyzing the pressure versus time plot resulting from the test. Such characteristics as flow rate of liquid phase mud through the mud cake, formation permeability, formation pressure, invasion diameter, and the extent of supercharging, can be determined. The entire test takes no longer than a few minutes, versus hours and sometimes days for more conventional techniques and test tools.

Inventors

  • 👤 Robert Desbrandes

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-27 15:08
CPC Classifications
E; E21; E21B; E21B49/00; E21B49/008; E21B49/08; E21B49/081

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 27
Claim 1
Independent Claim 180 words
A method for testing subsurface formations from a bore hole containing compressed drilling fluid, which method comprises: (a) positioning a drill stem down hole test tool down a bore hole adjacent to the formation to be tested, said test tool containing: (i) an entry port, (ii) a chamber of known volume, (iii) a means for controlling the flow rate of the drilling fluid into the test tool, and (iv) a pressure measuring means; (b) utilizing at least one packer to isolate an 11 interval of bore hole by expanding the packer and sealing the 12 annular space between the test tool and the bore hole; (c) effectively controlling the flow rate of drilling fluid into the chamber of the test tool so that substantial instantaneous decompression of the drilling fluid does not occur; and (d) measuring and plotting pressure as a function of time from the time the seal is made between the test tool and the wall of the bore hole until at least the time at which the chamber of the test tool is filled with drilling fluid.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 180 words
A method for testing subsurface formations from a bore hole containing compressed drilling fluid, which method comprises: (a) positioning a drill stem down hole test tool down a bore hole adjacent to the formation to be tested, said test tool containing: (i) an entry port, (ii) a chamber of known volume, (iii) a means for controlling the flow rate of the drilling fluid into the test tool, and (iv) a pressure measuring means; (b) utilizing at least one packer to isolate an 11 interval of bore hole by expanding the packer and sealing the 12 annular space between the test tool and the bore hole; (c) effectively controlling the flow rate of drilling fluid into the chamber of the test tool so that substantial instantaneous decompression of the drilling fluid does not occur; and (d) measuring and plotting pressure as a function of time from the time the seal is made between the test tool and the wall of the bore hole until at least the time at which the chamber of the test tool is filled with drilling fluid.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 11 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the drilling fluid is mud.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 40 words
The method of claim 2 wherein the flow rate of the fluid entering the test tool is from about 0.4 in 3 /min to about 40 in 3 /min for a volume of mud of about 13,000 in 3 .
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 22 words
The method of claim 3 wherein the flow rate is from about 0.8 in 3 /min to about 8 in 3 /min.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 17 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the permeability of the formation is less than about 10 millidarcies.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 16 words
The method of claim 5 wherein the permeability of the formation is less than 5 millidarcies.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 18 words
The method of claim 6 wherein the permeability of the formation is from about 0.1 to 1 millidarcies.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 57 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the plot of pressure versus time is analyzed to determine one or more of the following formation characteristics: (a) the flow rate of liquid phase mud passing through the mud cake; (b) the permeability of the formation; (c) the formation pressure; (d) the invasion diameter; and (e) the extent of supercharging.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 38 words
The method of claim 8 wherein the permeability of the formation is determined by comparing the section of pressure versus time plot, starting with the sand face pressure, to a set of theoretical curve generated for various permeabilities.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 32 words
The method of claim 1 wherein multiple tests and plots are made at the same location, or at different locations, in the bore hole, before raising the test tool to the surface.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 29 words
The method of claim 10 wherein the bore hole is cased and the pressure versus time curve is used to determine permeability of the formation and the formation pressure.
Claim 13
Independent Claim 220 words
A method for testing subsurface formations from a bore hole containing compressed mud, wherein said formations have a permeability in the range of about 0.01 to 5 millidarcies, which method comprises: (a) positioning a drill stem down hole test tool down a bore hole adjacent to the formation to be tested, said test tool which is capable of making multiple tests before being raised to the surface, which tool contains: (i) an entry port, (ii) a chamber of known volume, (iii) a means for controlling the flow rate of the mud into the test tool in the range of about 0.4 in 3 /min to about 40 in 3 /min, and (iv) a pressure measuring means; (b) utilizing at least one packer to isolate an interval of bore hole by expanding the packer and sealing the annular space between the test tool and the bore hole; (c) effectively controlling the flow rate of mud into the chamber of the test tool so that substantial instantaneous decompression of the drilling fluid does not occur; and (d) measuring and plotting the pressure as a function of time from the time the seal is made between the test tool and the wall of the bore hole until at least the time at which the chamber of the test tool is filled with mud.
Claim 14
Independent Claim 220 words
A method for testing subsurface formations from a bore hole containing compressed mud, wherein said formations have a permeability in the range of about 0.01 to 5 millidarcies, which method comprises: (a) positioning a drill stem down hole test tool down a bore hole adjacent to the formation to be tested, said test tool which is capable of making multiple tests before being raised to the surface, which tool contains: (i) an entry port, (ii) a chamber of known volume, (iii) a means for controlling the flow rate of the mud into the test tool in the range of about 0.4 in 3 /min to about 40 in 3 /min, and (iv) a pressure measuring means; (b) utilizing at least one packer to isolate an interval of bore hole by expanding the packer and sealing the annular space between the test tool and the bore hole; (c) effectively controlling the flow rate of mud into the chamber of the test tool so that substantial instantaneous decompression of the drilling fluid does not occur; and (d) measuring and plotting the pressure as a function of time from the time the seal is made between the test tool and the wall of the bore hole until at least the time at which the chamber of the test tool is filled with mud.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 38 words
The method of claim 12 wherein the flow rate of mud into the tool is from about 0.8 in 3 /min to about 8 in 3 /min for a volume of mud of about 13,000 in 3 .
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 62 words
The method of claim 12 wherein the plot of pressure versus time is analyzed to determine one or more of the following formation characteristics: (a) the flow rate of liquid phase mud through the mud cake if the bore hole is not cased; (b) the permeability of the formation; (c) the formation pressure; (d) the invasion diameter; (e) the extent of supercharging.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 38 words
The method of claim 12 wherein the permeability of the formation is determined by comparing the section of pressure versus time plot, starting with the sand face pressure, to a set of theoretical curves generated for various permeabilities.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 34 words
The method of claim 12 wherein the plot of pressure versus time is from a cased bore hole and used to determine one or both of the permeability of the formation and the formation
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 73 words
A drill stem down hole test tool for testing subsurface formations, which test tool comprises: (a) an elongated housing; (b) at least one packer; (c) at least one entry port for receiving drilling fluid into the test tool; (d) at least one chamber of known volume; (e) a means for effectively controlling the flow rate of drilling fluid into the test tool; (f) a pressure sensing means in communication with a recording means.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 73 words
A drill stem down hole test tool for testing subsurface formations, which test tool comprises: (a) an elongated housing; (b) at least one packer; (c) at least one entry port for receiving drilling fluid into the test tool; (d) at least one chamber of known volume; (e) a means for effectively controlling the flow rate of drilling fluid into the test tool; (f) a pressure sensing means in communication with a recording means.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 77 words
The test tool of claim 17 which contains an upper chamber and a lower chamber, which lower chamber is filled with hydraulic fluid and said chambers being in communication with one another by way of a choke for controlling the flow rate of hydraulic fluid into the upper chamber, wherein said lower chamber also contains a floating piston for forcing the hydraulic fluid through said choke and into said upper chamber by pressure exerted by the mud.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 34 words
The test tool of claim 18 which also contains means for unseating the packer, expelling the fluid, reseating the packer, and obtaining another set of measurements, without having to be raised to the surface.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 29 words
The test tool of claim 19 which also contains an interval space in the tool for receiving a sample of fluid, through an entry port, from the bore hole.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 17 words
The test tool of claim 17 which contains two packers for isolating an interval of bore hole.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 17 words
The test tool of claim 19 which contains two packers for isolating a interval of bore hole.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 15 words
The test tool of claim 12 wherein the recording means is in the test tool.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 15 words
The test tool of claim 21 wherein the recording means is in the test tool.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

SU274044A1 Cited
FR1352764A Cited
US4597439A Cited
SU1332011A1 Cited
US4903765A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1995-03-17 1995-09-16 1996-03-17 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1999-03-17 1999-09-16 2000-03-17 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2003-03-17 2003-09-16 2004-03-17 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag