US5083456A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Plate brake tester apparatus and method
Assignee: Hunter Engineering Co
•
Filing: 1990-06-05
•
Granted: 1992-01-28
•
Expires: 2010-06-05
Abstract
Abstract The brakes of a two-axle vehicle are tested by weighing the vehicle and measuring the braking forces for both axles to determine the actual ratio of front axle braking force to total braking force. The deceleration applied to the vehicle is determined from the weight of the vehicle and the applied braking forces. A nominal preferred value of the ratio of front axle braking force to total braking force is calculated from the determined deceleration and the measured weight of the vehicle. The nominal preferred value varies from test to test with both the actual deceleration and the vehicle weight. For each test, upper and lower limits for the acceptability of the actual ratio of front axle braking force to total braking force are set based upon the computed nominal preferred value. These limits move from test to test with the computed nonimal preferred value. The nominal preferred value, the movable limits, and the actual ratio are displayed to the user on a CRT screen. The actual ratio is displayed in the form of a bar on the screen, with the limits and nominal preferred value displayed as non-numeric indicia along the longitudinal axis of the bar.
Inventors
- 👤 Nicholas J. Colarelli, III
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-04 17:35
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01L; G01L5/00; G01L5/28; G01L5/288
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 23
Claim 1
Independent Claim
220 words
The method of testing the adequacy of the brakes of a two-axle vehicle, comprising the steps of: weighing the vehicle under test; measuring the braking forces for both axles of the vehicle under test to obtain a first figure representing the front axle braking force and a second figure representing the rear axle braking force; determining the deceleration applied to the vehicle under test as a result of the measured braking forces; after weighing the vehicle under test and determining said deceleration, computing a nominal preferred value of a predetermined mathematical function of the front axle braking force and the rear axle braking force from the determined deceleration and the measured weight of the vehicle, so that the nominal preferred value varies from test to test with both the actual deceleration and the vehicle weight, said function being a ratio of braking forces; computing the actual value of the predetermined mathematical function of the front axle braking force and the rear axle braking force from the first and second figures for the vehicle under test; and for each test setting upper and lower limits for the acceptability of the actual value of the predetermined mathematical function based upon the computed nominal preferred value, said limits being movable limits which move from test to test with the computed nominal preferred value.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
220 words
The method of testing the adequacy of the brakes of a two-axle vehicle, comprising the steps of: weighing the vehicle under test; measuring the braking forces for both axles of the vehicle under test to obtain a first figure representing the front axle braking force and a second figure representing the rear axle braking force; determining the deceleration applied to the vehicle under test as a result of the measured braking forces; after weighing the vehicle under test and determining said deceleration, computing a nominal preferred value of a predetermined mathematical function of the front axle braking force and the rear axle braking force from the determined deceleration and the measured weight of the vehicle, so that the nominal preferred value varies from test to test with both the actual deceleration and the vehicle weight, said function being a ratio of braking forces; computing the actual value of the predetermined mathematical function of the front axle braking force and the rear axle braking force from the first and second figures for the vehicle under test; and for each test setting upper and lower limits for the acceptability of the actual value of the predetermined mathematical function based upon the computed nominal preferred value, said limits being movable limits which move from test to test with the computed nominal preferred value.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method as set forth in claim 1 wherein the nominal preferred value varies from test to test with the actual deceleration and the vehicle weight only.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method as set forth in claim 1 including the further step of presetting the relative positions of the movable limits with respect to the nominal preferred value.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method as set forth in claim 3 wherein the presetting step includes selecting the relative positions of the movable limits from among a set of standard relative positions.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
58 words
The method as set forth in claim 1 further including the step of preselecting absolute upper and lower limits for the actual value of the predetermined mathematical function of the front axle braking force and rear axle braking force, which absolute limits remain the same from test to test and are independent of the computed nominal preferred value.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method as set forth in claim 5 wherein the brakes of a vehicle under test are rejected as inadequate whenever the actual value falls outside either the movable limits for that particular test or the absolute limits.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
40 words
The method as set forth in claim 5 further including the step of replacing a movable limit with its corresponding absolute limit when the movable limit results in a larger range of acceptable values than does the corresponding absolute limit.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method as set forth in claim 7 further including the step of displaying the limits for acceptability of the actual value of the predetermined mathematical function and displaying the actual value itself.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method as set forth in claim 1 wherein the step of computing the nominal preferred value includes the step of estimating the wheelbase of the vehicle under test from the measured weight of the vehicle.
Claim 11
Independent Claim
195 words
The method of testing the adequacy of the brakes of a two-axle vehicle, comprising the steps of: weighing the vehicle under test; measuring the braking forces for both axles of the vehicle under test to obtain a first figure representing the front axle braking force and a second figure representing the rear axle braking force; determining the deceleration applied to the vehicle under test as a result of the measured braking forces; after weighing the vehicle under test and determining said deceleration, computing a nominal preferred value of a predetermined mathematical junction of the front axle braking force and the rear axle braking force from the determined deceleration and the measured weight of the vehicle, so that the nominal preferred value varies from test to test with both the actual deceleration and the vehicle weight, said predetermined mathematical function being a ratio of braking forces; computing the actual value of the predetermined mathematical function of the front axle braking force and the rear axle braking force from the first and second figures for the vehicle under test; and displaying the computed nominal preferred value and the computed actual value for the vehicle under test simultaneously.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
195 words
The method of testing the adequacy of the brakes of a two-axle vehicle, comprising the steps of: weighing the vehicle under test; measuring the braking forces for both axles of the vehicle under test to obtain a first figure representing the front axle braking force and a second figure representing the rear axle braking force; determining the deceleration applied to the vehicle under test as a result of the measured braking forces; after weighing the vehicle under test and determining said deceleration, computing a nominal preferred value of a predetermined mathematical junction of the front axle braking force and the rear axle braking force from the determined deceleration and the measured weight of the vehicle, so that the nominal preferred value varies from test to test with both the actual deceleration and the vehicle weight, said predetermined mathematical function being a ratio of braking forces; computing the actual value of the predetermined mathematical function of the front axle braking force and the rear axle braking force from the first and second figures for the vehicle under test; and displaying the computed nominal preferred value and the computed actual value for the vehicle under test simultaneously.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method as set forth in claim 10 wherein the nominal preferred value varies from test to test with the actual deceleration and the vehicle weight only.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
57 words
The method as set forth in claim 10 further including the step of, for each test, setting upper and lower limits for the acceptability of the actual value of the predetermined mathematical function based upon the computed nominal preferred value, said limits being movable limits which move from test to test with the computed nominal preferred value.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
59 words
The method as set forth in claim 12 further including the step of preselecting absolute upper and lower limits for the actual value of the predetermined mathematical function of the front axle braking force and the rear axle braking force, which absolute limits remain the same from test to test and are independent of the computed nominal preferred value.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
40 words
The method as set forth in claim 13 including the step of rejecting the brakes of a vehicle under test as inadequate whenever the actual value falls outside either the movable limits for that particular test or the absolute limits.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
40 words
The method as set forth in claim 13 further including the step of replacing a movable limit with its corresponding absolute limit when the movable limit results in a larger range of acceptable values than does the corresponding absolute limit.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method as set forth in claim 15 further including the step of displaying the limits for acceptability of the actual value along with the actual value itself.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method as set forth in claim 10 wherein the step of computing the nominal preferred value includes the step of estimating the wheelbase of the vehicle under test from the measured weight of the vehicle.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
204 words
Apparatus for testing the adequacy of the brakes of a two-axle vehicle, comprising: weighing means for weighing the vehicle under test; measuring means for measuring the brake forces for both axles of the vehicle under test to obtain a first figure representing the front axle braking force and a second figure representing the rear axle braking force; electronic computing means responsive to the weighing means and to the measuring means for determining the deceleration applied to the vehicle under test as a result of the measured braking forces, for computing from said weight and said deceleration a nominal preferred value of a predetermined mathematical function of the front axle braking force and the rear axle braking force, said nominal preferred value varying from test to test with both the actual deceleration and the vehicle weight, said predetermined mathematical function being a ratio of braking forces, and for computing the actual value of the predetermined mathematical function of the front axle braking force and the rear axle braking force from the first and second figures for the vehicle under test; and display means for displaying the computed nominal preferred value and the computed actual value of the predetermined mathematical function for the vehicle under test.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
204 words
Apparatus for testing the adequacy of the brakes of a two-axle vehicle, comprising: weighing means for weighing the vehicle under test; measuring means for measuring the brake forces for both axles of the vehicle under test to obtain a first figure representing the front axle braking force and a second figure representing the rear axle braking force; electronic computing means responsive to the weighing means and to the measuring means for determining the deceleration applied to the vehicle under test as a result of the measured braking forces, for computing from said weight and said deceleration a nominal preferred value of a predetermined mathematical function of the front axle braking force and the rear axle braking force, said nominal preferred value varying from test to test with both the actual deceleration and the vehicle weight, said predetermined mathematical function being a ratio of braking forces, and for computing the actual value of the predetermined mathematical function of the front axle braking force and the rear axle braking force from the first and second figures for the vehicle under test; and display means for displaying the computed nominal preferred value and the computed actual value of the predetermined mathematical function for the vehicle under test.
Claim 22
Independent Claim
137 words
The method of testing the adequacy of the brakes of a two-axle vehicle, comprising the steps of: determining the static weight distribution of the vehicle under test; measuring the braking forces for both axles of the vehicle under test; determining the deceleration applied to the vehicle under test as a result of the measured braking forces; computing a nominal preferred value of a predetermined mathematical function of the front axle braking force and the rear axle braking force from the deceleration and the static weight distribution of the vehicle, so that the nominal preferred value varies from test to test with both the deceleration and the vehicle static weight distribution, said predetermined mathematical function being a ratio of braking forces; and displaying the computed nominal preferred value of the predetermined mathematical function for the vehicle under test.
Claim 23
Independent Claim
137 words
The method of testing the adequacy of the brakes of a two-axle vehicle, comprising the steps of: determining the static weight distribution of the vehicle under test; measuring the braking forces for both axles of the vehicle under test; determining the deceleration applied to the vehicle under test as a result of the measured braking forces; computing a nominal preferred value of a predetermined mathematical function of the front axle braking force and the rear axle braking force from the deceleration and the static weight distribution of the vehicle, so that the nominal preferred value varies from test to test with both the deceleration and the vehicle static weight distribution, said predetermined mathematical function being a ratio of braking forces; and displaying the computed nominal preferred value of the predetermined mathematical function for the vehicle under test.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4011751A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1995-01-27 | 1995-07-29 | 1996-01-28 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1999-01-27 | 1999-07-29 | 2000-01-28 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2003-01-27 | 2003-07-29 | 2004-01-28 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |