US5083281A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Insertion machine with speed optimization
Assignee: Bell and Howell LLC
•
Filing: 1991-01-22
•
Granted: 1992-01-21
•
Expires: 2011-01-22
Abstract
Abstract A speed optimization circuit (140) is employed by an insertion machine to result in a greater actual throughput of successfully enveloped sets of documents. The speed optimization circuit (140) includes a microcontroller (142) which determines whether the machine cycling speed should be changed and which generates a signal for application to a speed adjustment servomechanism (136) for automatically changing the machine cycling speed in accordance with the determination.
Inventors
- 👤 K. George Rabindran
- 👤 David Filicicchia
- 👤 Kenneth L. Guenther
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-26 22:28
CPC Classifications
B; B65; B65H; B65H39/00; B65H39/02; B07; B07C; B07C1/00; B43; B43M; B43M3/00; B43M3/04; B65H2511/00; B65H2511/30; B65H2513/00; B65H2513/10; B65H2513/50; B65H2513/52; B65H2557/00; B65H2557/20
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
286 words
A method of operating a machine of the type which performs functions in accordance with a machine cycle, said method comprising the steps of: (a) commencing operation of said machine whereby said machine repeatedly performs a processing event; (b) establishing a time interval whereby, for each of a plurality of successive such time intervals, the performance of said machine can be evaluated; (c) establishing a weighing factor for weighting information obtained with respect to said most recent interval relative to information accumulatively averaged over preceding time intervals; (d) determining an actual machine cycle speed; (e) determining, for a most recent time interval, an indication of the number of repetitions of said processing event said machine can be expected to successfully perform during a unit of time; (f) developing a new forecast of the projected number of sets of repetitions of said processing event said machine is expected to successfully perform during said unit of time by averaging said indication determined in step (e) with a previous forecast, said previous forecast being either: (i) an accumulatively averaged number of the number of successful repetitions of said processing event performed for a unit of time during previous intervals; or, (ii) upon commencement of said machine, a predetermined default value; (g) determining a percentage productivity index by dividing said new forecast by said actual machine cycle speed; (h) representing said actual machine cycle speed as a percentage value indicative of a maximum rated machine cycle speed; and, (i) comparing said percentage productivity index obtained in step (g) with the percentage obtained in step (h) to determine whether the actual machine cycling speed should be changed to result in a greater actual number of successful repetitions of said processing event.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
286 words
A method of operating a machine of the type which performs functions in accordance with a machine cycle, said method comprising the steps of: (a) commencing operation of said machine whereby said machine repeatedly performs a processing event; (b) establishing a time interval whereby, for each of a plurality of successive such time intervals, the performance of said machine can be evaluated; (c) establishing a weighing factor for weighting information obtained with respect to said most recent interval relative to information accumulatively averaged over preceding time intervals; (d) determining an actual machine cycle speed; (e) determining, for a most recent time interval, an indication of the number of repetitions of said processing event said machine can be expected to successfully perform during a unit of time; (f) developing a new forecast of the projected number of sets of repetitions of said processing event said machine is expected to successfully perform during said unit of time by averaging said indication determined in step (e) with a previous forecast, said previous forecast being either: (i) an accumulatively averaged number of the number of successful repetitions of said processing event performed for a unit of time during previous intervals; or, (ii) upon commencement of said machine, a predetermined default value; (g) determining a percentage productivity index by dividing said new forecast by said actual machine cycle speed; (h) representing said actual machine cycle speed as a percentage value indicative of a maximum rated machine cycle speed; and, (i) comparing said percentage productivity index obtained in step (g) with the percentage obtained in step (h) to determine whether the actual machine cycling speed should be changed to result in a greater actual number of successful repetitions of said processing event.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of: adjusting said actual machine cycle speed in accordance with the result of comparison of step (i).
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said actual machine cycle speed is increased if said productivity index obtained in step (g) is greater than said percentage obtained in step (h).
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 2, wherein said actual machine cycle speed is decreased if said productivity index obtained in step (g) is less than said percentage obtained in step (h).
Claim 6
Independent Claim
10 words
The method of step 2, wherein said adjustment is automatic.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
10 words
The method of step 2, wherein said adjustment is automatic.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of: (j) using said new forecast as said previous forecast; and (k) repeating steps (d) through (i) for a next interval.
Claim 9
Independent Claim
121 words
A method of operating a machine comprising the steps of: (a) commencing operation of said machine whereby said machine repeatedly performs a processing event; (b) determining a rate at which said machine performs said processing event; (c) determining an indication of the number of repetitions of said processing event said machine can perform during a unit of time; (d) using said determination of steps (b) and (c) to determine whether the rate at which said machine performs said processing event should be changed to result in a greater number of successfully performed processing events during a unit of time; and, (e) automatically changing said rate at which said machine performs said processing event in accordance with the determination of step (d).
Claim 10
Independent Claim
121 words
A method of operating a machine comprising the steps of: (a) commencing operation of said machine whereby said machine repeatedly performs a processing event; (b) determining a rate at which said machine performs said processing event; (c) determining an indication of the number of repetitions of said processing event said machine can perform during a unit of time; (d) using said determination of steps (b) and (c) to determine whether the rate at which said machine performs said processing event should be changed to result in a greater number of successfully performed processing events during a unit of time; and, (e) automatically changing said rate at which said machine performs said processing event in accordance with the determination of step (d).
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4142238A
Cited
US4506339A
Cited
US4577848A
Cited
US4634107A
Cited
US4734865A
Cited
US4865304A
Cited
US4903456A
Cited
US4987547A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1995-01-20 | 1995-07-22 | 1996-01-21 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1999-01-20 | 1999-07-22 | 2000-01-21 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2003-01-20 | 2003-07-22 | 2004-01-21 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |