US5082366A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Apparatus and method for detecting leaks in packages
Assignee: Laser Technology Inc
•
Filing: 1990-08-30
•
Granted: 1992-01-21
•
Expires: 2010-08-30
Abstract
Abstract This invention detects leaks in small, hermetically sealed packages, especially microchips or other packages of electronic circuits. The invention includes a procedure for detecting fine leaks, and a somewhat different procedure for finding gross leaks. To detect gross leaks, one places the package in a chamber, and varies the pressure in the chamber slightly. If the leak is not too big, one wall of the package, such as its lid, initially becomes deformed, but quickly returns to its original position, due to the leak. If the leak is very large, the wall of the package may not move at all. The position of the wall is monitored with an interferometer, preferably an electronic shearography apparatus. The movements of the wall show whether there is a gross leak. In the fine leak test, the package is placed in the chamber and the pressure is changed substantially, thus causing the walls of the package to deform. If there is a fine leak, a deformed wall gradually returns to its initial position. This gradual return can be measured by the interferometer, and the rate at which the wall returns to its starting position can be used to calculate the leak rate. The interferometer can be located inside the test chamber, or it can be located outside the chamber. At least one additional "control" package is preferably placed inside the chamber, alongside the test package, to verify the accuracy of the test results.
Inventors
- 👤 II John Tyson
- 👤 John W. Newman
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-05 23:22
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01M; G01M3/00; G01M3/02; G01M3/36; G01M3/363
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 33
Claim 1
Independent Claim
121 words
A method of inspecting a package for gross leaks, comprising the steps of: a) placing the package in a chamber, b) recording a first interferometric image of the surface of the package, c) varying the pressure in the chamber by an amount sufficient to deform a surface of the package by a small integral number of wavelengths of light, d) recording a second interferometric image of the surface of the package, e) waiting for an interval of several seconds, f) recording a series of third interferometric images of the surface observed in step (c), and g) comparing the third images with at least one of the previous images to determine whether the surface has moved during the interval of step (d).
Claim 2
Independent Claim
121 words
A method of inspecting a package for gross leaks, comprising the steps of: a) placing the package in a chamber, b) recording a first interferometric image of the surface of the package, c) varying the pressure in the chamber by an amount sufficient to deform a surface of the package by a small integral number of wavelengths of light, d) recording a second interferometric image of the surface of the package, e) waiting for an interval of several seconds, f) recording a series of third interferometric images of the surface observed in step (c), and g) comparing the third images with at least one of the previous images to determine whether the surface has moved during the interval of step (d).
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the interval of step (e) is chosen to be sufficiently long to allow the surface to move by an amount sufficient to form at least one interference fringe in the third interferometric images.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 2, wherein the interval of step (e) is also chosen to be not so long as to allow the surface to return to its initial position.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the interferometric images are obtained by electronic shearography.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the comparing step is performed with respect to only a portion of the surface of the package, and wherein said portion is near a region of maximum interferometric response on the surface.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 1, wherein steps (a) through (g) are simultaneously performed on the package being inspected and on at least one control package.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of calculating a leak rate based on the amount by which the surface has moved during said interval.
Claim 9
Independent Claim
104 words
A method of inspecting a package for fine leaks, comprising the steps of: a) placing the package in a chamber, b) varying the pressure in the chamber by an amount sufficient to deform a surface of the package by a large number of wavelengths of light, c) recording a first interferometric image of the surface of the package, after completion of step (b), d) recording a series of second interferometric images of the surface observed in step (c), and e) comparing the second images with the first image to detect changes in displacement of the surface while said second interferometric images are being recorded.
Claim 10
Independent Claim
104 words
A method of inspecting a package for fine leaks, comprising the steps of: a) placing the package in a chamber, b) varying the pressure in the chamber by an amount sufficient to deform a surface of the package by a large number of wavelengths of light, c) recording a first interferometric image of the surface of the package, after completion of step (b), d) recording a series of second interferometric images of the surface observed in step (c), and e) comparing the second images with the first image to detect changes in displacement of the surface while said second interferometric images are being recorded.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method of claim 8, wherein the interferometric images are obtained by electronic shearography.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 8, wherein the comparing step is performed with respect to only a portion of the surface of the package, and wherein said portion is near a region of maximum interferometric response on the surface.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 8, wherein steps (a) through (e) are simultaneously performed on the package being inspected and on at least one control package.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 8, further comprising the step of calculating a leak rate based on the amount by which the surface moves during step (e).
Claim 15
Independent Claim
102 words
A method of testing a microchip for gross leaks, comprising the steps of: a) placing the microchip in a chamber, b) recording a first interferometric image of a surface of the microchip, c) slightly varying the pressure in the chamber, d) recording a second interferometric image of a surface of the microchip, e) waiting for an interval of several seconds, f) recording a series of third interferometric images of the surface observed in step (d), and g) comparing the third images with at least one of the previous images to determine whether the surface has moved during the interval of step (e).
Claim 16
Independent Claim
102 words
A method of testing a microchip for gross leaks, comprising the steps of: a) placing the microchip in a chamber, b) recording a first interferometric image of a surface of the microchip, c) slightly varying the pressure in the chamber, d) recording a second interferometric image of a surface of the microchip, e) waiting for an interval of several seconds, f) recording a series of third interferometric images of the surface observed in step (d), and g) comparing the third images with at least one of the previous images to determine whether the surface has moved during the interval of step (e).
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method of claim 13, wherein the interval of step (e) is chosen to be sufficiently long to allow the surface to move by an amount sufficient to form at least one interference fringe in the third interferometric images.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 13, wherein the interferometric images are obtained from a means for generating an interferogram, the interferogram generating means being located outside the chamber.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 13, wherein there are at least two microchips within the chamber, and wherein the method is performed simultaneously on all microchips within the chamber.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 13, wherein the interferometric images are obtained from a means for generating an interferogram, at least a portion of the interferogram generating means being located inside the chamber.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 17, wherein there are at least two microchips within the chamber, and wherein the method is performed simultaneously on all microchips within the chamber.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
84 words
Apparatus or detecting leaks in a microchip, comprising: a) means defining a chamber, the microchip being tested being located inside the chamber, b) an additional microchip located inside the chamber, the additional microchip being called the "control", c) means for electronically generating a shearogram, the shearogram generating means being positioned to detect movements in surfaces of both microchips located within the chamber, d) means for analyzing shearograms taken of the microchips in the chamber, and e) means for varying the pressure in the chamber.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
84 words
Apparatus or detecting leaks in a microchip, comprising: a) means defining a chamber, the microchip being tested being located inside the chamber, b) an additional microchip located inside the chamber, the additional microchip being called the "control", c) means for electronically generating a shearogram, the shearogram generating means being positioned to detect movements in surfaces of both microchips located within the chamber, d) means for analyzing shearograms taken of the microchips in the chamber, and e) means for varying the pressure in the chamber.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
15 words
The apparatus of claim 19, wherein the shearogram generating means is located outside the chamber.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
20 words
The apparatus of claim 19, wherein at least a portion of the shearogram generating means is located inside the chamber.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
14 words
The apparatus of claim 20, wherein the chamber defining means includes a transparent cover.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
35 words
The apparatus of claim 19, wherein the control package comprises a metallic diaphragm connected to means defining a cavity, the diaphragm being similar in size and shape to a surface of the microchip being tested.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
27 words
The apparatus of claim 23, wherein the cavity is sufficiently large such that small leaks in the cavity do not substantially affect the results of the test.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
25 words
The apparatus of claim 23, wherein the cavity is fluidly connected to the outside, such that the pressure within the cavity is at ambient pressure.
Claim 30
Independent Claim
85 words
A method of inspecting a package for gross leaks, comprising the steps of: a) placing the package in a chamber, b) varying the pressure in the chamber by an amount sufficient to deform a surface of the package by a small integral number of wavelengths of light, c) determining the position of the surface of the package, d) waiting for an interval of several seconds, and e) repeating step (c), so as to determine whether the surface has moved during the interval of step (d).
Claim 31
Independent Claim
85 words
A method of inspecting a package for gross leaks, comprising the steps of: a) placing the package in a chamber, b) varying the pressure in the chamber by an amount sufficient to deform a surface of the package by a small integral number of wavelengths of light, c) determining the position of the surface of the package, d) waiting for an interval of several seconds, and e) repeating step (c), so as to determine whether the surface has moved during the interval of step (d).
Claim 32
Independent Claim
76 words
A method of inspecting a package for fine leaks, comprising the steps of: a) placing the package in a chamber, b) varying the pressure in the chamber by an amount sufficient to deform a surface of the package by a large number of wavelengths of light, c) determining the position of the surface of the package, after completion of step (b), and d) performing step (c) repeatedly, so as to locate any movements in the surface.
Claim 33
Independent Claim
76 words
A method of inspecting a package for fine leaks, comprising the steps of: a) placing the package in a chamber, b) varying the pressure in the chamber by an amount sufficient to deform a surface of the package by a large number of wavelengths of light, c) determining the position of the surface of the package, after completion of step (b), and d) performing step (c) repeatedly, so as to locate any movements in the surface.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4702594A
Cited
US4887899A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1995-01-20 | 1995-07-22 | 1996-01-21 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1999-01-20 | 1999-07-22 | 2000-01-21 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2003-01-20 | 2003-07-22 | 2004-01-21 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |