US5059974A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for determining phantom switch condition
Assignee: Qisda Corp
•
Filing: 1989-02-02
•
Granted: 1991-10-22
•
Expires: 2009-02-02
Abstract
Abstract A method of determining a phantom key condition in an encoder array (10) including (1) enabling each row (R1-R14) of the encoder to a high position; (2) pulling the first row (R1) to be scanned to a low position; (3) scanning the first row (R1) of which in the low position finding whether there is a first key being closed, (4) determining whether there is second key being closed in the first column (C2) of which the first key has been closed, if there isn't a second key being closed, then outputting the signal, if there is a second key being closed, then (5) determining whether there is a third key being closed in the second row of which a second key has been closed before, if there isn't a third key that exists, output the signal, if a third key exists in the second row, (6) then the phenomenon of a phantom exists and the inputting signals will be invalid and beeper sound is emitted to warn the typist.
Inventors
- 👤 Dennis Wu
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-29 23:14
CPC Classifications
H; H03; H03M; H03M11/00; H03M11/003
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 8
Claim 1
Independent Claim
228 words
A method of determining a phantom switch condition in an encoder array and for controlling the issuance of array condition signals responsive to the presence or absence of a phantom switch condition, the array having a matrix of conductors set in intersecting rows and columns, said conductors being electrically interconnectable by a switch at each intersection of a row and column, said method comprising the steps of: (a) placing the array in a condition in which actuation of the switches can be detected by scanning the rows and detecting switch actuation in the columns; (b) scanning each row to detect whether two or more switches in the scanned row are actuated; (c) if two or more switches in the scanned row are not detected as being actuated in step (b), issuing array condition signals in accordance with the actuated switch; (d) if two or more switches are detected as being actuated in step (b), further detecting whether another switch in the same column as that of a switch detected in step (b) is actuated; (e) if another switch is detected as being actuated in step (d), so that a phantom switch condition exists in the array, preventing issuance of array condition signals; and (f) if another switch is not detected as being actuated in step (d), issuing array condition signals corresponding to all actuated switches in the array.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
228 words
A method of determining a phantom switch condition in an encoder array and for controlling the issuance of array condition signals responsive to the presence or absence of a phantom switch condition, the array having a matrix of conductors set in intersecting rows and columns, said conductors being electrically interconnectable by a switch at each intersection of a row and column, said method comprising the steps of: (a) placing the array in a condition in which actuation of the switches can be detected by scanning the rows and detecting switch actuation in the columns; (b) scanning each row to detect whether two or more switches in the scanned row are actuated; (c) if two or more switches in the scanned row are not detected as being actuated in step (b), issuing array condition signals in accordance with the actuated switch; (d) if two or more switches are detected as being actuated in step (b), further detecting whether another switch in the same column as that of a switch detected in step (b) is actuated; (e) if another switch is detected as being actuated in step (d), so that a phantom switch condition exists in the array, preventing issuance of array condition signals; and (f) if another switch is not detected as being actuated in step (d), issuing array condition signals corresponding to all actuated switches in the array.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
96 words
The method according to claim 1 wherein the encoder array has associated therewith means for controlling the potential applied to the conductors, wherein step (a) is further defined as setting the potential of the row and column conductors to a common first level, and wherein step (b) is further defined as sequentially changing the potential of each row conductor to a second, different level, while retaining the other row conductors at the common first level, and detecting the actuation of the switches by sensing whether the potential on the column conductors is at the second level.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
96 words
The method according to claim 1 wherein the encoder array has associated therewith means for controlling the potential applied to the conductors, wherein step (a) is further defined as setting the potential of the row and column conductors to a common first level, and wherein step (d) is further defined as sequentially changing the potential of each row conductor to a second, different level while retaining the other row conductors at the common first level and detecting the actuation of the switches by sensing whether the potential on the column conductors is at the second level.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
33 words
The method according to claim 2 wherein step (d) is further defined as detecting the actuation of another switch by sensing whether the potential on the column conductors is at the second level.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
58 words
The method according to claim 2 wherein step (a) is further defined as setting the potential of the row and column conductors to a common high level, and wherein step (b) is further defined as sequentially changing the potential of each row conductor to a second, low level while retaining the other row conductors the first high level.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
59 words
The method according to claim 3 wherein step (a) is further defined as setting the potential of the row and column conductors to a common high level, and wherein step (d) is further defined as sequentially changing the potential of each row conductor to a second, low level while retaining the other row conductors at the first high level.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method according to claim 1 wherein step (e) is further defined as issuing a warning signal that a phantom switch condition exists.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
GB229695A
Cited
US4420744A
Cited
EP0072471A2
Cited
US4417824A
Cited
US4633228A
Cited
GB2162351A
Cited
US4922248A
Cited
US4918444A
Cited
US4794375A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1994-10-21 | 1995-04-22 | 1995-10-22 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1998-10-21 | 1999-04-22 | 1999-10-22 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2002-10-21 | 2003-04-22 | 2003-10-22 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |