US5024090A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Loose rock detector
Assignee: HDRK Mining Research Ltd
•
Filing: 1989-09-15
•
Granted: 1991-06-18
•
Expires: 2009-09-15
Abstract
Abstract A loose rock detector comprises an impact tool for hitting the rock face, sensors for detecting acoustic, rock motion and/or impact force signals generated by movement of the impact tool against the face of the rock, a data processor responsive to the sensors for correlating the above signals in the time and/or frequency domain against predetermined relationships to detect loose rocks and to assess mass and degree of looseness of the rock, and a display unit for displaying the results of the correlation.
Inventors
- 👤 Michel J. Pettigrew
- 👤 David B. Rhodes
- 👤 Eric G. Lux
- 👤 Victor A. Mason
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-08 07:51
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01V; G01V1/00; G01H; G01H1/00; G01N; G01N3/00; G01N3/30; G01N2291/00; G01N2291/02; G01N2291/028; G01N2291/02827
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 13
Claim 1
Independent Claim
158 words
A loose rock detector comprising: a) an impact tool for hitting the rock face; b) at least one sensor responsive to vibrations generated in the rock and in the impact tool by movement of said impact tool against the face of the rock for generating acoustic signals representative of said vibrations; c) a data processor responsive to said signals for correlating said signals in the frequency domain against a predetermined relationship to detect loose rocks, said relationship being F1×F2/F3, where F2 is the sum of the amplitude of the acoustic signals attributed to both the rock and impact tool vibrations in a frequency range of 0-2000 Hz minus the sum of the amplitude of the acoustic signal attributed to impact tool vibration, and F3 is the sum of the amplitude of the acoustic signal attributed to impact tool vibration in a frequency range of 0-5000 Hz; and d) a display unit for displaying the results of the correlation.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
158 words
A loose rock detector comprising: a) an impact tool for hitting the rock face; b) at least one sensor responsive to vibrations generated in the rock and in the impact tool by movement of said impact tool against the face of the rock for generating acoustic signals representative of said vibrations; c) a data processor responsive to said signals for correlating said signals in the frequency domain against a predetermined relationship to detect loose rocks, said relationship being F1×F2/F3, where F2 is the sum of the amplitude of the acoustic signals attributed to both the rock and impact tool vibrations in a frequency range of 0-2000 Hz minus the sum of the amplitude of the acoustic signal attributed to impact tool vibration, and F3 is the sum of the amplitude of the acoustic signal attributed to impact tool vibration in a frequency range of 0-5000 Hz; and d) a display unit for displaying the results of the correlation.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
108 words
A loose rock detector comprising: a) an impact tool for hitting the rock face; b) at least one sensor responsive to vibrations generated in the rock by movement of said impact tool against the face of the rock for generating rock motion signals representative of said vibrations; c) a data processor responsive to said signals for correlating said signals in the frequency domain against a predetermined relationship to detect loose rock, said relationship being F4, which is the integral of the power spectral density of the rock motion signals in a frequency range of 125-375 Hz; and d) a display unit for displaying the results of the correlation.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
108 words
A loose rock detector comprising: a) an impact tool for hitting the rock face; b) at least one sensor responsive to vibrations generated in the rock by movement of said impact tool against the face of the rock for generating rock motion signals representative of said vibrations; c) a data processor responsive to said signals for correlating said signals in the frequency domain against a predetermined relationship to detect loose rock, said relationship being F4, which is the integral of the power spectral density of the rock motion signals in a frequency range of 125-375 Hz; and d) a display unit for displaying the results of the correlation.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
30 words
A loose rock detector as defined in claims 1 or 2 wherein at least one additional criterion in the frequency of time domain is used to improve reliability of detection.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
136 words
A loose rock detector comprising: a) an impact tool for hitting the rock face and having means for measuring impact force and producing a signal indicative thereof; b) at least one sensor responsive to vibrations generated in the rock by movement of said impact tool against the face of the rock for generating acoustic signals representative of said vibrations; c) a data processor responsive to said signals for correlating said signals in the frequency domain against a predetermined relationship for mass assessment of loose rock, said relationship being F7×F5/F6, where F5 is the amplitude of low frequency acoustic signals from the rock below 500 Hz, and F6 is the integral of the impact force during the time the impact tool is contacting the rock; and d) a display unit for displaying the results of the correlation.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
136 words
A loose rock detector comprising: a) an impact tool for hitting the rock face and having means for measuring impact force and producing a signal indicative thereof; b) at least one sensor responsive to vibrations generated in the rock by movement of said impact tool against the face of the rock for generating acoustic signals representative of said vibrations; c) a data processor responsive to said signals for correlating said signals in the frequency domain against a predetermined relationship for mass assessment of loose rock, said relationship being F7×F5/F6, where F5 is the amplitude of low frequency acoustic signals from the rock below 500 Hz, and F6 is the integral of the impact force during the time the impact tool is contacting the rock; and d) a display unit for displaying the results of the correlation.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
113 words
A loose rock detector comprising: a) an impact tool for hitting the rock face and having means for measuring impact force and producing a signal indicative thereof; b) at least one sensor responsive to vibrations generated in the rock by movement of said impact tool against the face of the rock for generating rock motion signals representative of said vibrations; c) A data processor responsive to said signals for correlating said signals against a predetermined relationship F8 for mass assessment of loose rock, said relationship being that loose rock mass is inversely proportional to rock acceleration for a given impact force; and d) a display unit for displaying the results of the correlation.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
113 words
A loose rock detector comprising: a) an impact tool for hitting the rock face and having means for measuring impact force and producing a signal indicative thereof; b) at least one sensor responsive to vibrations generated in the rock by movement of said impact tool against the face of the rock for generating rock motion signals representative of said vibrations; c) A data processor responsive to said signals for correlating said signals against a predetermined relationship F8 for mass assessment of loose rock, said relationship being that loose rock mass is inversely proportional to rock acceleration for a given impact force; and d) a display unit for displaying the results of the correlation.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
93 words
A loose rock detector comprising: a) an impact tool for hitting the rock face; b) at least one sensor responsive to vibrations generated in the rock by movement of said impact tool against the face of the rock for generating acoustic signals representative of said vibrations; c) a data processor responsive to said signals for correlating said signals in the time domain against a predetermined relationship for degree of looseness assessment of loose rock, said relationship being F9×rock acoustic signal damping; and d) a display unit for displaying the results of the correlation.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
93 words
A loose rock detector comprising: a) an impact tool for hitting the rock face; b) at least one sensor responsive to vibrations generated in the rock by movement of said impact tool against the face of the rock for generating acoustic signals representative of said vibrations; c) a data processor responsive to said signals for correlating said signals in the time domain against a predetermined relationship for degree of looseness assessment of loose rock, said relationship being F9×rock acoustic signal damping; and d) a display unit for displaying the results of the correlation.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
94 words
A loose rock detector comprising: a) an impact tool for hitting the rock face; b) at least one sensor responsive to vibrations generated in the rock by movement of said impact tool against the face of the rock for generating rock motion signals representative of said vibrations; c) a data processor responsive to said signals for correlating said signals in the time domain against a predetermined relationship for degree of looseness assessment of loose rock, said relationship being F10×rock acceleration signal damping; and d) a display unit for displaying the results of the correlation.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
94 words
A loose rock detector comprising: a) an impact tool for hitting the rock face; b) at least one sensor responsive to vibrations generated in the rock by movement of said impact tool against the face of the rock for generating rock motion signals representative of said vibrations; c) a data processor responsive to said signals for correlating said signals in the time domain against a predetermined relationship for degree of looseness assessment of loose rock, said relationship being F10×rock acceleration signal damping; and d) a display unit for displaying the results of the correlation.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1994-06-17 | 1994-12-17 | 1995-06-18 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1998-06-17 | 1998-12-17 | 1999-06-18 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2002-06-17 | 2002-12-17 | 2003-06-18 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |