← Back to Patent Explorer
US5022498A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Method and apparatus for controlling a group of elevators using fuzzy rules

Assignee: Fujitec Co Ltd
•
Filing: 1989-01-30
•
Granted: 1991-06-11
•
Expires: 2009-01-30
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract The present invention relates to an elevator group control method of controlling a plurality of elevator cars servicing for a plurality of floors, including the steps of applying fuzzy rule groups to a hall call when such a call occurs, and selecting an optimum elevator car with a fuzzy inference applied, and assigning a call to the car. A plurality of fuzzy rule groups are successively applied according to respective priority orders previously given to the fuzzy rule groups. In such successive application, only when there is at least one car, excluding the car whose assignment aptitude is optimum, which has the difference in the assignment aptitude value for the current rule group, from that of an optimum car, of not greater than a predetermined threshold value, a subsequent rule group is applied.

Inventors

  • 👤 Kenji Sasaki
  • 👤 Kenji Yokota
  • 👤 Hiroshi Hattori
  • 👤 Nobuyuki Sata

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-05 08:14
CPC Classifications
B; B66; B66B; B66B1/00; B66B1/24; B66B1/2408; B66B2201/00; B66B2201/20; B66B2201/211; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S706/00; Y10S706/90; Y10S706/902; Y10S706/903; Y10S706/91

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 21
Claim 1
Independent Claim 142 words
An elevator group control method for controlling a plurality of elevator cars that service a plurality of floors, in which fuzzy rule groups are applied to a hall call when an elevator call occurs and an optimum elevator car is assigned to proceed to the floor from which the hall call originates based upon the application of the fuzzy rule groups, comprising the step of: successively applying subsequent fuzzy rule groups to the elevator cars according to priority orders previously assigned to the fuzzy rule groups, in which successive applications of the fuzzy rule groups occurs only when at least one elevator car, excluding the optimum elevator car whose assignment aptitude value is optimum, has a difference in an assignment aptitude value for a current rule group from that of the optimum elevator car, of not more than a predetermined threshold value.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 142 words
An elevator group control method for controlling a plurality of elevator cars that service a plurality of floors, in which fuzzy rule groups are applied to a hall call when an elevator call occurs and an optimum elevator car is assigned to proceed to the floor from which the hall call originates based upon the application of the fuzzy rule groups, comprising the step of: successively applying subsequent fuzzy rule groups to the elevator cars according to priority orders previously assigned to the fuzzy rule groups, in which successive applications of the fuzzy rule groups occurs only when at least one elevator car, excluding the optimum elevator car whose assignment aptitude value is optimum, has a difference in an assignment aptitude value for a current rule group from that of the optimum elevator car, of not more than a predetermined threshold value.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 22 words
The method of claim 1, wherein higher priority orders are given to more important rule groups in view of the elevator call.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 22 words
The method of claim 1, wherein higher priority orders are given to more basic rule groups in view of the elevator call.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 44 words
The method of claim 1, wherein a total assignment aptitude value is obtained by adding the assignment aptitude values of the plurality of elevator cars from a previous rule group to the assignment aptitude values of the elevator cars for the current rule group.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 16 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the predetermined threshold value is set for each rule group.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 299 words
An elevator group control apparatus for controlling a plurality of elevator cars that service a plurality of floors, in which fuzzy rule groups are applied to a hall call when an elevator call is placed and an optimum elevator car is assigned to proceed to a floor from which said hall call originates based upon the application of said fuzzy rule groups, comprising: a knowledge base unit for storing a plurality of predetermined rule groups to which priority orders are given; a rule set selection unit for successively selecting rule groups according to said priority orders; an evaluation index calculation unit for calculating evaluation indexes in response to a traffic information signal when said hall call occurs; a fuzzy inference unit for obtaining a conformance degree of each elevator car for each rule group based upon said evaluation indexes and a membership function, and for obtaining, based upon said degree of conformance, an assignment aptitude value for each elevator car for each rule group; and an assignment aptitude evaluation unit for single step advancing selection operations of said rule set selecting unit at a time when at least one elevator car, in addition to said optimum elevator car, has an assignment aptitude value for a current rule group that differs from said optimum assignment aptitude value of said optimum elevator car by no more than a predetermined threshold value, and for stopping said selection operation of said rule set selecting unit when the difference in said assignment aptitude value for said current rule group is greater than said predetermined threshold value, thereby providing an assignment signal for selecting an elevator car having an optimum assignment aptitude value, and assigning said elevator car having said optimum assignment aptitude value to proceed to said floor from which said hall call originates.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 299 words
An elevator group control apparatus for controlling a plurality of elevator cars that service a plurality of floors, in which fuzzy rule groups are applied to a hall call when an elevator call is placed and an optimum elevator car is assigned to proceed to a floor from which said hall call originates based upon the application of said fuzzy rule groups, comprising: a knowledge base unit for storing a plurality of predetermined rule groups to which priority orders are given; a rule set selection unit for successively selecting rule groups according to said priority orders; an evaluation index calculation unit for calculating evaluation indexes in response to a traffic information signal when said hall call occurs; a fuzzy inference unit for obtaining a conformance degree of each elevator car for each rule group based upon said evaluation indexes and a membership function, and for obtaining, based upon said degree of conformance, an assignment aptitude value for each elevator car for each rule group; and an assignment aptitude evaluation unit for single step advancing selection operations of said rule set selecting unit at a time when at least one elevator car, in addition to said optimum elevator car, has an assignment aptitude value for a current rule group that differs from said optimum assignment aptitude value of said optimum elevator car by no more than a predetermined threshold value, and for stopping said selection operation of said rule set selecting unit when the difference in said assignment aptitude value for said current rule group is greater than said predetermined threshold value, thereby providing an assignment signal for selecting an elevator car having an optimum assignment aptitude value, and assigning said elevator car having said optimum assignment aptitude value to proceed to said floor from which said hall call originates.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 21 words
The apparatus of claim 6, wherein higher priority orders are stored in said knowledge base unit for more important rule groups.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 21 words
The apparatus of claim 6, wherein higher priority orders are stored in said knowledge base unit for more basic rule groups.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 45 words
The apparatus of claim 6, wherein a total assignment value is obtained by said fuzzy inference unit by adding the assignment aptitude values for said elevator cars from a previous rule group to assignment aptitude values for said elevator cars of a current rule group.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 20 words
The apparatus of claim 6, wherein said assignment aptitude evaluation unit sets a predetermined threshold value for each rule group.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 142 words
An elevator group control apparatus for determining which elevator car from a plurality of elevator cars should proceed to a floor from which a hall call originates, comprising: means for storing a plurality of predetermined rule groups to which priority orders are given; means for selecting rule groups according to said priority orders; means for calculating indexes in response to a traffic information signal when said hall call occurs; means for obtaining an assignment aptitude value for each elevator car for each selected rule group so as to determine a degree of conformance of each elevator car for each selected rule group; and means for selecting additional rule groups when an assignment aptitude value of an elevator car for a current rule group differs from an optimum assignment value of an optimum elevator car by no more than a predetermined threshold value.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 142 words
An elevator group control apparatus for determining which elevator car from a plurality of elevator cars should proceed to a floor from which a hall call originates, comprising: means for storing a plurality of predetermined rule groups to which priority orders are given; means for selecting rule groups according to said priority orders; means for calculating indexes in response to a traffic information signal when said hall call occurs; means for obtaining an assignment aptitude value for each elevator car for each selected rule group so as to determine a degree of conformance of each elevator car for each selected rule group; and means for selecting additional rule groups when an assignment aptitude value of an elevator car for a current rule group differs from an optimum assignment value of an optimum elevator car by no more than a predetermined threshold value.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 33 words
The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising means for stopping said selecting means when the difference in said assignment aptitude value for said current rule group is greater than said predetermined threshold value.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 14 words
The apparatus of claim 11, wherein said storing means comprises a knowledge base unit.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 17 words
The apparatus of claim 11, wherein said assignment aptitude value obtaining means comprises a fuzzy inference unit.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 47 words
The apparatus of claim 11, wherein a total assignment value is obtained by said assignment aptitude value obtaining means by adding the assignment aptitude values for said elevator cars from a previous rule group to assignment aptitude values for said elevator cars of a current rule group.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 53 words
The apparatus of claim 12, wherein said assignment aptitude value obtaining means comprises a fuzzy inference unit, said fuzzy inference unit obtaining a total assignment value adding the assignment aptitude values for said elevator cars from a previous rule group to assignment aptitude values for said elevator cars of a current rule group.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 18 words
The apparatus of claim 11, further comprising means for setting a predetermined threshold value for each rule group.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 18 words
The apparatus of claim 12, further comprising means for setting a predetermined threshold value for each rule group.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

JPS5323458A Cited
JPS6317778A Cited
GB2195792A Cited
US4760896A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1994-06-10 1994-12-10 1995-06-11 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1998-06-10 1998-12-10 1999-06-11 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2002-06-10 2002-12-10 2003-06-11 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag