US4989953A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Video display terminal filter
Assignee: LARGO INVESTMENT Corp
•
Filing: 1989-01-24
•
Granted: 1991-02-05
•
Expires: 2009-01-24
Abstract
Abstract An optical filter for use with visual display devices such as cathode ray tubes (CRT's) used with video display terminals (VDT's), television sets and the like enhances the viewability of characters and graphics displayed by increasing the contrast ratio, i.e., relative brightness, between illuminated picture elements (pixels) and un-illuminated pixels. The filter comprises a thin, transparent flexible polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic film adherable to the faceplate of the CRT or other display device by surface adhesion alone. Dyes are incorporated into the plastic film which color the film subtractively complementarily to the emission color of the display, thereby causing reduced light transmittance for wavelengths close to wavelength of peak light emission of the display device. The filters are attached to the faceplate of the CRT or other display device, by first coating one surface of the film with water, pressing the film against the faceplate, and drawing a straight edge or similar rigid edged surface across the outer surface of the film, thereby squeegeeing water from between the film and faceplate, and adhering the film thereto. A magenta colored filter, subtractively complementarily colored to the peak emission color of CRT having a green phosphor, is used with that color CRT. A bluish colored filter is used with CRT's having an amber colored phosphor. A neutral density, or gray colored filter is used with multi-color and black and white displays.
Inventors
- 👤 Kevin A. Kirschner
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-28 17:55
CPC Classifications
H; H01; H01J; H01J29/00; H01J29/86; H01J29/89; H01J29/898
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 28
Claim 1
Independent Claim
69 words
An optical filter for improving the viewability of images displayed on a visual display device of the type having a faceplate viewing window, comprising a thin, generally uniform thickness, substantially transparent flexible plastic film adherable to said faceplate without the use of an adhesive, said film having an optical transmission property which enhances the brightness of said images on said display device relative to background areas not displaying images.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
69 words
An optical filter for improving the viewability of images displayed on a visual display device of the type having a faceplate viewing window, comprising a thin, generally uniform thickness, substantially transparent flexible plastic film adherable to said faceplate without the use of an adhesive, said film having an optical transmission property which enhances the brightness of said images on said display device relative to background areas not displaying images.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
36 words
The filter of claim 1, wherein said film is adherable to said faceplate by means of a thin film of water interposed between a rear surface of said film and the front surface of said faceplate.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
16 words
The filter of claim 1, wherein said plastic film is further defined as being polyvinyl chloride.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
32 words
The filter of claim 1, wherein said optical transmission property comprises a relatively uniform degree of absorption over a visible wavelength range including the wavelength of images displayed on said display device.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
23 words
The filter of claim 4, wherein the overall light transmission of said filter, integrated over the visible spectrum, is approximately 60 percent±10 percent.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
41 words
The filter of claim 1, wherein said optical transmission property comprises a spectrally selective light absorbance giving said filter a color which is substantially subtractively complementary to at least one wavelength of peak emission of said images on said display device.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
23 words
The filter of claim 6, wherein the overall light transmission of said filter, integrated over the visible spectrum, is approximately 60 percent±10 percent.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
44 words
The filter of claim 1, wherein said optical transmission property comprises a selectively greater light absorbance for wavelengths near at least one wavelength of peak emission of said images on said display device, than for other wavelengths in other portions of the visible spectrum.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
23 words
The filter of claim 8, wherein the overall light transmission of said filter, integrated over the visible spectrum, is approximately 60 percent±10 percent.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
83 words
A filter for enhancing the contrast ratio between higher intensity radiation emitting locations of a finite spectral bandwidth in a source array, relative to lower intensity radiation emitting locations, comprising a mask superimposable over said source array between said source array and an intended receiving location for receiving radiation emitted from said array, said mask having selectively greater attenuation for radiation wavelengths near the wavelength of peak emission of said array, relative to the attenuation of other wavelengths receivable by said receiving location.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
83 words
A filter for enhancing the contrast ratio between higher intensity radiation emitting locations of a finite spectral bandwidth in a source array, relative to lower intensity radiation emitting locations, comprising a mask superimposable over said source array between said source array and an intended receiving location for receiving radiation emitted from said array, said mask having selectively greater attenuation for radiation wavelengths near the wavelength of peak emission of said array, relative to the attenuation of other wavelengths receivable by said receiving location.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
31 words
The filter of claim 10, wherein said selectively greater attenuation of said filter is further defined as being a notch-shaped transmission minimum at a wavelength near said wavelength of peak emission.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
25 words
The filter of claim 11, wherein said transmission notch has a narrower bandwidth than the spectral bandwidth of said radiation emitted from said source array.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
16 words
The filter of claim 10, wherein said radiation emitted from said source array is electromagnetic radiation.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
17 words
The filter of claim 13, wherein said electromagnetic radiation lies in the visible portion of the spectrum.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
28 words
The filter of claim 14, wherein said mask is an optical filter which is subtractively complementarily colored with respect to a predominate emission color of said source array.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
56 words
An optical filter for enhancing the viewability of images displayed on a visual display device having a faceplate viewing window, said filter comprising a thin, generally uniform thickness substantially transparent plastic film conformable to the surface of said faceplate and adherable thereto without the use of an adhesive, said film having a controlled light absorption characteristic.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
56 words
An optical filter for enhancing the viewability of images displayed on a visual display device having a faceplate viewing window, said filter comprising a thin, generally uniform thickness substantially transparent plastic film conformable to the surface of said faceplate and adherable thereto without the use of an adhesive, said film having a controlled light absorption characteristic.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
19 words
The optical filter of claim 16, wherein said transparent plastic film is further defined as being polyvinyl chloride film.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
56 words
The filter of claim 17, wherein said controlled light absorption characteristic is further defined as comprising a spectrally selective light absorption peak/transmission notch at a wavelength near at least one wavelength of peak emission of said images on said display device, the bandwidth of said transmission notch being smaller than the bandwidth of said emission peak.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
23 words
The filter of claim 18, wherein the overall light transmission of said filter, integrated over the visible spectrum, is approximately 60 percent±10 percent.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
38 words
The optical filter of claim 17, wherein said controlled light absorption characteristic is further defined as comprising a relatively uniform degree of absorption over a visible wavelength range including the wavelength of images displayed on said display device.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
23 words
The filter of claim 20, wherein the overall light transmission of said filter integrated over the visible spectrum, is approximately 60 percent±10 percent.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
29 words
The filter of claim 21, wherein the thickness of said polyvinyl chloride film is further defined as having a thickness in a range from 0.0005 inch to 0.015 inch.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
30 words
The filter of claim 17, wherein said filter has a color which is substantially subtractively complementary to at least one predominate emission color of said images on said display device.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
23 words
The filter of claim 23, wherein the overall light transmission of said filter, integrated over the visible spectrum, is approximately 60 percent±10 percent.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
29 words
The filter of claim 24, wherein the thickness of said polyvinyl chloride film is further defined as having a thickness in a range from 0.0005 inch to 0.015 inch.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3382183A
Cited
US3382393A
Cited
US3582189A
Cited
US3873863A
Cited
US3957354A
Cited
US4246613A
Cited
US4253737A
Cited
US4253737B1
Cited
US4504867A
Cited
US4633322A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1994-02-04 | 1994-08-06 | 1995-02-05 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1998-02-04 | 1998-08-06 | 1999-02-05 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2002-02-04 | 2002-08-06 | 2003-02-05 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |