US4943374A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Use of a microporous membrane constructed of polyether sulfon and hydrophilization agent for the filtration of beer
Assignee: Neenah Gessner GmbH
•
Filing: 1988-04-25
•
Granted: 1990-07-24
•
Expires: 2008-04-25
Abstract
Abstract The invention concerns the use of a microporous membrane constructed of polyether sulfon and a hydrophilization agent having a pore size which is within the range of between 0.1 and 1.2 microns for the filtration of beer. This membrane filter proves to be particularly suitable for the microbiological stabilization of the beer and for the separation of the turbid substances. The membrane makes it possible to remove the germs which are harmful to the beer and the harmful turbid substances and to simultaneously filter the beer with a high throughput and therefore economically and with low costs.
Inventors
- 👤 Hans-Ulrich Heininger
- 👤 Wilhelm Munninger
- 👤 Ernst Pawlowsky
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 06:39
CPC Classifications
B; B01; B01D; B01D71/00; B01D71/06; B01D71/66; B01D71/68; C; C12; C12H; C12H1/00; C12H1/02; C12H1/06; C12H1/063
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 44
Claim 1
Independent Claim
48 words
A process for the separation of harmful germs, turbid substances and yeast from beer comprising filtering beer containing germs, turbid substances and/or yeast with a microporous membrane, constructed of polyether sulfone and a hydrophilization agent, having a pore size in the range of between 0.1 and 1.2 microns.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
48 words
A process for the separation of harmful germs, turbid substances and yeast from beer comprising filtering beer containing germs, turbid substances and/or yeast with a microporous membrane, constructed of polyether sulfone and a hydrophilization agent, having a pore size in the range of between 0.1 and 1.2 microns.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
31 words
A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the polyether sulfone constitutes a polyarylether sulfone having the repeating structural unit [C 6 H 4 --SO 2 --C 6 H 4 --O].
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
22 words
A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein hydrophilic groups are integrated in the polyether sulfone as substituents, as the hydrophilization agent.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
40 words
A process in accordance with claim 3 wherein the hydrophilic groups are selected from the group consisting of --NR 2 , --SO 3 H, --COOR and --OR, where R is an alkyl, aralkyl or aryl radical or a hydrogen atom.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
34 words
A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the hydrophilization agent constitutes at least one hydrophilic polymer, which is polymerized with the polyether sulfone or is mixed in a mixture with the polyether sulfone.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
33 words
A process in accordance with claim 5 wherein the hydrophilic polymer is selected from the group consisting of polyethylene glycol, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyvinylalcohol, polyvinylacetate, polyacrylic acid, polyacrylic acid ester, cellulose derivatives and combinations thereof.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
35 words
A process in accordance with claim 6 wherein the hydrophilic polymer is present in a concentration in the range of from 0.1% to 6% based by weight, based on the weight of the polyether sulfone.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
31 words
A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the hydrophilization agent is present in an amount of from 0.05% to 20 % weight, based on the weight of the polyether sulfone.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
30 words
A process in accordance with claim 8 wherein said hydrophilization agent is present in an amount of from 0.1% to 8% weight, based on the weight of the polyether sulfone.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
24 words
A process in accordance with claim 1, wherein the pore size of the membrane is within the range of between 0.2 and 0.8 micron.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
24 words
A process in accordance with claim 10 wherein the pore size of the membrane is within the range of between 0.45 and 0.65 micron.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
39 words
A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the magnitude ratio of the pores on one side of the membrane to the pores on the opposite side of the membrane is in the range of between 1.5:1 and 2.5:1.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
18 words
A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the void volume of the membrane is at least 70%.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
31 words
A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the water flow rate at a pressure of 0.7 bar is within the range of from 10 to 200 ml/min. cm 2 .
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
30 words
A process in accordance with claim 14 wherein said water flow rate is in the range of between 30 and 65 ml/min. cm 2 at a pressure of 0.7 bar.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
27 words
A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the air flow rate at a pressure of 0.7 bar is between 1 and 24 1/min. cm 2 .
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
27 words
A process in accordance with claim 16 wherein said air flow rate, at a pressure of 0.7 bar, is between 4 and 8 1/min. cm 2 .
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
19 words
A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the bubble point with water is from 0.7 to 7.5 bars.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
17 words
A process in accordance with claim 18 wherein said bubble point is between 1.2 and 2.5 bars
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
46 words
A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein, after washing the membrane with a lower alcohol, the contact angle with glycerine is less than 40° on one side of the membrane and a contact angle of less than 25° on the opposite side of the membrane.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
38 words
A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the membrane, after washing with a lower alcohol and subsequent drying, remains spontaneously and completely wettable with water, with no additional wetting agent necessary for the filtration of the beer.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
111 words
A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the membrane has a pore diameter of from 0.45 to 0.65 micron, a porosity of at least 70%, a water flow rate of from 30 to 65 ml/min. cm 2 at a pressure of 0.7 bar, an air flow rate of from 4 to 8 1/min. cm 2 at a pressure of 0.7 bar, a bubble point with water of 0.2 bar to 2.5 bars and, after washing the membrane with a lower alcohol, a contact angel with glycerine of less than 40° on one side of the membrane and an angle of less than 25° on the opposite side of the membrane.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
19 words
A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the thickness of said membrane is from 50 to 300 microns.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
23 words
A process in accordance with claim 23 wherein the thickness of said membrane is in the range of between 120 and 180 microns.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
26 words
A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the basis weight of the membrane is within the range of from 1.3 to 8.0 mg/cm 2 .
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
18 words
A process in accordance with claim 25 wherein said membrane weighs between 3.2 and 4.8 mg/cm 2 .
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
19 words
A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the membrane is resistant to hydrochloric acid and caustic soda solution.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
21 words
A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein less than 1.0% by weight of the membrane is extractable is boiling water.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
21 words
A process in accordance with claim 28 wherein less than 0.5% by weight in extractable from said membrane is boiling water.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
17 words
A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the membrane is provided with support for mechanical stabilization.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
43 words
A process in accordance with claim 30 wherein said supported membrane is designed as a flat filter selected from the group consisting of a disc filter, a spiral wound cartridge, a pleated cartridge, a plate and frame filter and a dynamic pressure filter.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
17 words
A process in accordance with claim 30 wherein said supported membrane is designed as a tubular filter.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
17 words
A process in accordance with claim 30 wherein said supported membrane is designed as a capillary filter.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
28 words
A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein the membrane is formed by precipitation from a solution of a polar aprotic solvent, polyether sulfone and a hydrophilization agent.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
23 words
A process in accordance with claim 34 wherein the polar aprotic solvent is selected from the group consisting of dimethylformamide, dimethylacetamide and N-methylpyrrolidone.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
32 words
A process in accordance with claim 34 wherein the polar aprotic solvent is present in an amount of from 17% to 45% by weight, based on the total weight of the solution.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
34 words
A process in accordance with claim 34 wherein the polyethene sulfone is present in the solution in an amount of from 10% to 15% by weight, based on the total weight of the solution.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim
46 words
A process in accordance with claim 34 wherein the membrane is produced by dissolving polyether sulfone in the aprotic polar solvent, adding polyethylene glycol and polyvinylpyrrolidone to the solution, the solution thus obtained poured into a thin layer and then adequately moistened to precipitate the membrane.
Claim 40
Dependent Claim
24 words
A process in accordance with claim 34 wherein said hydrophilization agent is selected from the group consisting of polyethylene glycol, polyvinylpyrrolidone and mixtures thereof.
Claim 41
Dependent Claim
36 words
A process in accordance with claim 39 wherein said hydrophilization agent includes polyethylene glycol present in a concentration in the range of between 40% and 70% by weight, based on the total weight of said solution.
Claim 42
Dependent Claim
35 words
A process in accordance with claim 39 wherein said hydrophilization agent includes polyvinylpyrrolidone present in said solution in a concentration of no more than 1% by weight, based on the weight of said polyether sulfone.
Claim 43
Dependent Claim
20 words
A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein said germs are filtered from said beer by means of static filtration.
Claim 44
Dependent Claim
29 words
A process in accordance with claim 1 wherein said turbid substances and said yeast are separated from said beer by means of dynamic cross-flow filtration or dynamic pressure filtration.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4720343A
Cited
US4481260A
Cited
US4612196A
Cited
EP0208450A2
Cited
DE3533306A1
Cited
EP0228072B1
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1993-07-23 | 1994-01-22 | 1994-07-24 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1997-07-23 | 1998-01-22 | 1998-07-24 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2001-07-23 | 2002-01-22 | 2002-07-24 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |