Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
253 words
A process for encoding digital speech information to represent human speech as audible synthesized speech with a reduced speech data rate while retaining speech quality in the reproduction of the encoded digital speech information as audible synthesized speech, said process comprising: encoding a sequence of input data in the form of a plurality of phonological linguistic units representative of a written version of a message to be coded to provide a first encoded speech sequence corresponding to the written version of the message to be coded; encoding a second sequence of input data derived from a spoken version of the same message to which the written version pertains in the form of a plurality of phonological linguistic units and intonation parameters corresponding thereto, wherein the phonological linguistic units are equivalent to the phonological linguistic units of said first encoded speech sequence, thereby providing a second encoded speech sequence including intonation parameters of the speech as a portion thereof and corresponding to the spoken version of the message to be coded; combining with the first encoded speech sequence corresponding to the written version of the message to be coded, the portion of the second encoded speech sequence corresponding to the spoken version of the message to be coded which includes the intonation parameters of the speech; and producing a composite encoded speech sequence corresponding to the message from the combination of the first encoded speech sequence and the encoded intonation parameters of the speech included in the portion of the second encoded speech sequence.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
253 words
A process for encoding digital speech information to represent human speech as audible synthesized speech with a reduced speech data rate while retaining speech quality in the reproduction of the encoded digital speech information as audible synthesized speech, said process comprising: encoding a sequence of input data in the form of a plurality of phonological linguistic units representative of a written version of a message to be coded to provide a first encoded speech sequence corresponding to the written version of the message to be coded; encoding a second sequence of input data derived from a spoken version of the same message to which the written version pertains in the form of a plurality of phonological linguistic units and intonation parameters corresponding thereto, wherein the phonological linguistic units are equivalent to the phonological linguistic units of said first encoded speech sequence, thereby providing a second encoded speech sequence including intonation parameters of the speech as a portion thereof and corresponding to the spoken version of the message to be coded; combining with the first encoded speech sequence corresponding to the written version of the message to be coded, the portion of the second encoded speech sequence corresponding to the spoken version of the message to be coded which includes the intonation parameters of the speech; and producing a composite encoded speech sequence corresponding to the message from the combination of the first encoded speech sequence and the encoded intonation parameters of the speech included in the portion of the second encoded speech sequence.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
98 words
A process as set forth in claim 1, wherein the encoding of the second sequence of input data derived from the spoken version of the message in providing the second encoded speech sequence includes encoding the duration and pitch of the phonological linguistic units as the encoded intonation parameters of the speech; and the combining of the first encoded speech sequence and the portion of the second encoded speech sequence includes the use of the encoded duration and pitch of the phonological linguistic units as the encoded intonation parameters of the portion of the second encoded speech sequence.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
15 words
A process as set forth in claim 2, wherein said phonological linguistic units comprise phonemes.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
15 words
A process as set forth in claim 2, wherein said phonological linguistic units comprise allophones.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
15 words
A process as set forth in claim 2, wherein said phonological linguistic units comprise diphones.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
76 words
A process as set forth in claim 1, further including providing a plurality of segment components of the message to be coded from the written version of the message, wherein each of the plurality of segment components comprises one or more phonological linguistic units; and encoding the written version of the message in conformance with the plurality of segment components in providing the first encoded speech sequence in which the plurality of segment components are encompassed.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
102 words
A process as set forth in claim 6, wherein the encoding of the second sequence of input data derived from the spoken version of the message is accomplished by analyzing the second sequence of input data to obtain the phonological linguistic units and intonation parameters corresponding thereto in providing the second encoded speech sequence; comparing the first encoded speech sequence corresponding to the written version of the message and the second encoded speech sequence corresponding to the spoken version of the message; and determining the proper time alignment between the first and second encoded speech sequences in response to the comparison therebetween.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
62 words
A process as set forth in claim 7, wherein the plurality of segment components of the message to be coded from the written version of the message are provided by concatenating phonological linguistic units which are stored as individual short sound segments in a dictionary; and comparing the spoken version of the message with said concatenated phonological linguistic units via dynamic programming.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
51 words
A process as set forth in claim 8, wherein the dynamic programming is operable on spectral distances to minimize the total spectral distance between the first encoded speech sequence corresponding to the written version of the message and the second encoded speech sequence corresponding to the spoken version of the message.