Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 14
Claim 1
Independent Claim
129 words
Method for control of a magnet of a magnetically levitated railroad, wherein each individual magnet (j) has a controller which comprises an observer (10, 60) and which forms a controller output signal u R determining the voltage at a magnet coil from measured values of magnet gap width s and magnet acceleration b with determination of estimated values of magnet gap width s, gap change velocity s, and magnet acceleration s, comprising: obtaining an additional rail signal u from a further rail observer (20, 70) and from the measured magnitudes of the magnet gap width s and the magnet acceleration b of one of the magnets (j--k) which are leading in a travel direction; and feeding the additional rail signal u to the controller of the individual magnet (j).
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
129 words
Method for control of a magnet of a magnetically levitated railroad, wherein each individual magnet (j) has a controller which comprises an observer (10, 60) and which forms a controller output signal u R determining the voltage at a magnet coil from measured values of magnet gap width s and magnet acceleration b with determination of estimated values of magnet gap width s, gap change velocity s, and magnet acceleration s, comprising: obtaining an additional rail signal u from a further rail observer (20, 70) and from the measured magnitudes of the magnet gap width s and the magnet acceleration b of one of the magnets (j--k) which are leading in a travel direction; and feeding the additional rail signal u to the controller of the individual magnet (j).
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
82 words
Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the rail signal u in the further rail observer unit (20, 70) are formed by multiplication of the difference s-s by ω v 2 whereby ω v is given by ω v =2vD v /Δx and v is the magnet velocity in traveling direction, Dv the damping constant of the further rail observer unit (20, 70) of the respectively leading magnet (j--k) as well as Δ x the distance of the respective two magnets.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
95 words
Method according to claim 2, characterized in that the rail signal u derived from a respectively leading magnet (j--k) is added to the measured value b for the support loop (60) of the magnet (j), that estimated values for s and s are obtained from the measured values b and s, that an estimated value for s is formed by summation of the measured value b and an additional magnitude u derived from the rail signal u and that the controller output signal u R is obtained by linear combination of the three estimated values.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
61 words
Method according to claim 2, characterized in that addends derived respectively from the rail signal u of a leading magnet (j--k) are added to the estimated values of the magnet gap width s, the gap change velocity s and the magnet acceleration s and that the controller output signal u R is obtained by a linear combination of the resulting sums.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
70 words
Method according to claim 4, characterized in that the addends are derived by multiplication with the factors 1/N (for s), p/N (for s) and 2Dω s p/N (for s) from the rail signal wherein N=p 2 +2/dω s P+ω s 2 , D is the damping constant and ω s the cutoff frequency of the support loop (10) of the respectively trailing magnets (j) and p is the differential operator.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
43 words
Method according to claim 3, characterized in that the additional magnitude u is formed from the rail signal u and an additional observer unit (80) with multiplication by (2Dω s p+ω s z )/N where N=p 2 +2Dω s p+ω s 2 .
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
41 words
Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the measured values b and s used for formation of the rail signal u are obtained at a vehicle point leading in traveling direction with respect to the magnet (j) to be regulated.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
203 words
Control unit for generation of a controller output signal u R for controlling the magnets of a magnetic levitation railroad, wherein at least one support loop circuitry is assigned to each magnet, which contains a first summation member for addition of a measured value of the magnet acceleration b and a first feedback signal, an integrator downstream of the first summation member, a second summation member adding the output signal of said integrator as well as a second feedback signal, a second integrator downstream of said second summation member as well as a summation member subtracting the output signal of the second integrator from the measured value s, from whose output signal the two feedback signals are formed after multiplication by factors depending on the cutoff frequency ω s of the support circuit, characterized in that at least one rail observer-circuitry (20, 70) is assigned to each magnet (j--k), whose structure is identical to that of the support loop circuitry (10, 60), whose feedback signals are formed by multiplication with factors which are a function of the speed dependent cutoff frequency ω v =2vD v /Δx and whose first feedback signal is feedable as a rail signal u to a trailing magnet (j).
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
203 words
Control unit for generation of a controller output signal u R for controlling the magnets of a magnetic levitation railroad, wherein at least one support loop circuitry is assigned to each magnet, which contains a first summation member for addition of a measured value of the magnet acceleration b and a first feedback signal, an integrator downstream of the first summation member, a second summation member adding the output signal of said integrator as well as a second feedback signal, a second integrator downstream of said second summation member as well as a summation member subtracting the output signal of the second integrator from the measured value s, from whose output signal the two feedback signals are formed after multiplication by factors depending on the cutoff frequency ω s of the support circuit, characterized in that at least one rail observer-circuitry (20, 70) is assigned to each magnet (j--k), whose structure is identical to that of the support loop circuitry (10, 60), whose feedback signals are formed by multiplication with factors which are a function of the speed dependent cutoff frequency ω v =2vD v /Δx and whose first feedback signal is feedable as a rail signal u to a trailing magnet (j).
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
105 words
Control unit according to claim 8, with amplification members for receiving estimated values for the magnet gap width s, the gap width change velocity s and the magnet acceleration s obtainable from the support loop circuitry and a summation member receiving the output signals of the amplification members and supplying the controller output signal u R at the output, characterized in that, respectively, one additional summation member (8, 9, 18) is wired upstream of the amplification members (11, 12, 13), to which summation members addends derived from the rail signal of a leading magnet (j--k) in addition to the respective estimated value can be supplied.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
81 words
Control unit according to claim 8, with amplification members for receiving estimated values for the magnet gap width s and the gap width change velocity s obtainable from the support loop circuitry and a summation member receiving the output signals of the amplification members and supplying the controller output signal at the output, characterized in that a rail signal u formed in the rail observer circuitry (70) of a leading magnet (j--k) is additionally feedable to the first summation member (31).
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
70 words
Controller according to claim 10, including an additional summation member (49) to which the measured value of the magnet acceleration b and an additional signal u derived from the rail signal u can be fed, and which includes an additional amplifier member (48) switched downstream of said summation member (49) which on its output side is connected with the summation member (40) supplying the controller output signal u R .
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
86 words
Controller according to claim 11, including, respectively, one additional observer (80) forming the additional signal u from the rail signal u whose structure corresponds essentially to that of the observer (60), except that the first summation member (31) is eliminated, that the first backfeed signal is directly feedable to the first integrator (53) and that the rail signal u is feedable to the third summation member (52), this in addition to the output signal of the second integrator (54) which also represents the additional signal u.