US4862359A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Topographical mapping of brain functionality from neuropsychological test results
Assignee: Bio Logic Systems Corp
•
Filing: 1986-12-30
•
Granted: 1989-08-29
•
Expires: 2006-12-30
Abstract
Abstract A method and apparatus for evaluating physiological and behavioral functioning of predetermined regions of interest of the human brain by displaying topographical maps of measured information. Brain electrical activity and/or predetermined physical parameters are measured in association with selected neuropsychological tests, and the measured information is operated on by providing weighted output signals characteristic of physiological functioning of the regions of interest of the patient's brain. The resulting weighted output signals are plotted as a topographical map. The measured brain electrical activity and measured predetermined physical parameters are also compared and a conversion matrix developed based on data bases of measured information for normal and abnormal subjects.
Inventors
- 👤 Sushma S. Trivedi
- 👤 Raquel E. Gur
- 👤 Ruben Gur
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 13:08
CPC Classifications
A; A61; A61B; A61B5/00; A61B5/02; A61B5/026; A61B5/0275; A61B5/02755; A61B5/74; A61B5/742; A61B5/72; A61B5/7235; A61B5/7253; A61B5/7257
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 47
Claim 1
Independent Claim
81 words
A method of evaluating brain functionality of a subject comprising the steps of: providing neuropsychological test result data obtained from said subject in response to at least one preselected test; generating a weighted matrix of test output signals by applying to said test result data a plurality of coefficients, each said coefficient being representative of said one preselected test and corresponding to a preselected region of the brain; and displaying said weighted matrix of test output signals as a topographic map.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
81 words
A method of evaluating brain functionality of a subject comprising the steps of: providing neuropsychological test result data obtained from said subject in response to at least one preselected test; generating a weighted matrix of test output signals by applying to said test result data a plurality of coefficients, each said coefficient being representative of said one preselected test and corresponding to a preselected region of the brain; and displaying said weighted matrix of test output signals as a topographic map.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
19 words
The evaluation method of claim 1 wherein said test result data is provided for a plurality of preselected tests.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
24 words
The evaluation method of claim 1 wherein said test result data comprises a normatively based statistical analysis of test results obtained from said subject.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
65 words
The evaluation method of claim 1 wherein said test result data is provided for a plurality of tests; said coefficients are applied to said test result data for each said test to obtain a plurality of test output signal matrices; and said plurality of test output signal matrices are combined to obtain a composite test output signal matrix which is displayed as a topographic map.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
24 words
The evaluation method of claim 4 wherein said test result data comprises a normatively based statistical analysis of test results obtained from said subject.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
55 words
The evaluation method of claim 1 further including the steps of measuring at least one predetermined physical parameter of the subject's brain, generating a matrix of physical output signals in response to said measured parameter, and simultaneously displaying a topographic map of said physical output signals with said topographic map of said test output signals.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
14 words
The evaluation method of claim 6 wherein said measuring step comprises an electroencephalogram measurement.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
15 words
The evaluation method of claim 6 wherein said measuring step comprises an evoked potential measurement.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
14 words
The evaluation method of claim 6 wherein said measuring step comprises a magnetoencephalogram measurement.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
14 words
The evaluation method of claim 6 wherein said measuring step comprises positron emission tomography.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
15 words
The evaluation method of claim 6 wherein said measuring step comprises cerebral blood flow measurement.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
60 words
The evaluation method of claim 1 further including the steps of measuring at least one physical parameter of the subject's brain, generating a matrix of physical output signals responsive to said measured parameter, and combining said test output signal matrix with said physical output signal matrix to obtain a composite output signal matrix which is displayed as a topographic map.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
23 words
The evaluation method of claim 1 wherein said topographic map depicts brain functionality at an internal surface or plane within the subject's brain.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
20 words
The evaluation method of claim 1 wherein said topographic map is displayed within a three-dimensional representation of the human head.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
21 words
The evaluation method of claim 14 wherein said topographic map and three-dimensional representation are changed to provide a different perspective view.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
33 words
The evaluation method of claim 1 further including the steps of generating interpolated output signals between adjacent test output signals and displaying said interpolated and test output signals together as a topographic map.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
42 words
The evaluation method of claim 1 further including the steps of measuring at least one physical parameter of the subject's brain, generating a display of said one physical parameter and superimposing said physical parameter display over the display of said topographic map.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
25 words
The evaluation method of claim 17 wherein said topographic map and superimposed physical parameter display are presented within a three-dimensional representation of the human head.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
14 words
The evaluation method of claim 17 wherein said measuring step comprises an electroencephalogram measurement.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
15 words
The evaluation method of claim 17 wherein said measuring step comprises an evoked potential measurement.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
14 words
The evaluation method of claim 17 wherein said measuring step comprises a magnetoencephalogram measurement.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
14 words
The evaluation method of claim 17 wherein said measuring step comprises positron emission tomography.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
15 words
The evaluation method of claim 17 wherein said measuring step comprises cerebral blood flow measurement.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
36 words
The evaluation method of claim 1 further including the steps of scanning the anatomy of the subject's brain, generating a display of said anatomy and superimposing said anatomical display over the display of said topographic map.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
24 words
The evaluation method of claim 24 wherein said topographic map and said anatomical display are presented within a three-dimensional representation of the human head.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
16 words
The evaluation method of claim 24 wherein said anatomical display is made by x-ray computerized tomography.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
17 words
The evaluation method of claim 24 wherein said anatomical display is made by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
44 words
The evaluation method of claim 1 further including the steps of scanning the anatomy of the subject's brain, generating a matrix of anatomical output signals, and simultaneously displaying an image of said anatomical output signals with said topographic map of said test output signals.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
24 words
The evaluation method of claim 28 wherein said topographic map and said anatomical display are presented within a three-dimensional representation of the human head.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
16 words
The evaluation method of claim 28 wherein said anatomical display is made by x-ray computerized tomography.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
17 words
The evaluation method of claim 28 wherein said anatomical display is made by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.
Claim 33
Independent Claim
90 words
A method of evaluating brain-functionality of a subject comprising the steps of: providing neuropsychological test result data obtained from said subject in response to at least one preselected test; generating a matrix of test output signals by applying to said test result data a plurality of coefficients, each said coefficient being representative of said one preselected test and corresponding to a preselected region of the brain; generating interpolated output signals between adjacent test output signals; and displaying said test output signals and said interpolated output signals as a topographic map.
Claim 34
Independent Claim
90 words
A method of evaluating brain-functionality of a subject comprising the steps of: providing neuropsychological test result data obtained from said subject in response to at least one preselected test; generating a matrix of test output signals by applying to said test result data a plurality of coefficients, each said coefficient being representative of said one preselected test and corresponding to a preselected region of the brain; generating interpolated output signals between adjacent test output signals; and displaying said test output signals and said interpolated output signals as a topographic map.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
19 words
The evaluation method of claim 32 wherein said test result data is provided for a plurality of preselected tests.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
24 words
The evaluation method of claim 32 wherein said test result data comprises a normatively based statistical analysis of test results obtained from said subject.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
70 words
The evaluation method of claim 32 wherein said test result data is provided for a plurality of tests; said coefficients are applied to said test result data for each said test to obtain a plurality of test output signal matrices; and said plurality of test output signal matrices are combined to obtain a composite test output signal matrix which is displayed with said interpolated output signals as a topographic map.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
55 words
The evaluation method of claim 32 further including the steps of measuring at least one predetermined physical parameter of the subject's brain, generating a matrix of physical output signals in response to said measured parameter, and simultaneously displaying a topographic map of said physical output signals with said topographic map of said test output signals.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim
60 words
The evaluation method of claim 32 further including the steps of measuring at least one physical parameter of the subject's brain, generating a matrix of physical output signals responsive to said measured parameter, and combining said test output signal matrix with said physical output signal matrix to obtain a composite output signal matrix which is displayed as a topographic map.
Claim 40
Dependent Claim
23 words
The evaluation method of claim 32 wherein said topographic map depicts brain functionality at an internal surface or plane within the subject's brain.
Claim 41
Dependent Claim
20 words
The evaluation method of claim 32 wherein said topographic map is displayed within a three-dimensional representation of the human head.
Claim 42
Dependent Claim
42 words
The evaluation method of claim 32 further including the steps of measuring at least one physical parameter of the subject's brain, generating a display of said one physical parameter and superimposing said physical parameter display over the display of said topographic map.
Claim 43
Dependent Claim
36 words
The evaluation method of claim 32 further including the steps of scanning the anatomy of the subject's brain, generating a display of said anatomy and superimposing said anatomical display over the display of said topographic map.
Claim 44
Independent Claim
72 words
A method of evaluating brain functionality of a subject comprising the steps of: providing neuropsychological test result data obtained from said subject in response to at least one preselected test; generating a plurality of test output signals from said test result data, each said test output signal corresponding to said one preselected test and a preselected region of the brain; and displaying said plurality of test output signals as a topographic map.
Claim 45
Independent Claim
72 words
A method of evaluating brain functionality of a subject comprising the steps of: providing neuropsychological test result data obtained from said subject in response to at least one preselected test; generating a plurality of test output signals from said test result data, each said test output signal corresponding to said one preselected test and a preselected region of the brain; and displaying said plurality of test output signals as a topographic map.
Claim 46
Independent Claim
75 words
A method of evaluating brain functionality of a subject comprising the steps of: providing neuropsychological test result data obtained from said subject in response to at least one preselected test; generating a matrix of weighted test output signals from said test result data, each said weighted output signal being representative of said one preselected test and a preselected region of the brain; and displaying said matrix of weighted test output signals as a topographic map.
Claim 47
Independent Claim
75 words
A method of evaluating brain functionality of a subject comprising the steps of: providing neuropsychological test result data obtained from said subject in response to at least one preselected test; generating a matrix of weighted test output signals from said test result data, each said weighted output signal being representative of said one preselected test and a preselected region of the brain; and displaying said matrix of weighted test output signals as a topographic map.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1992-08-28 | 1993-02-27 | 1993-08-29 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1996-08-28 | 1997-02-27 | 1997-08-29 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2000-08-28 | 2001-02-27 | 2001-08-29 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |