Patent US3960827A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4847797A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Adaptive blind equilization method and device
Assignee: Siemens Telecomunicazioni SpA
•
Filing: 1987-02-27
•
Granted: 1989-07-11
•
Expires: 2007-02-27
Abstract
Abstract An adaptive blind equalization method and device uses self-decisions both in the convergence phase and the steady-state phase, making it possible to obtain a good and smooth adaptation in the convergence phase and a low error probability for the decided symbols in the steady state phase. By using the self-decided error and a reference error, a binary consent function is constructed which tells when it is allowed to proceed with the adaptation and when the adaptation should not be used. The binary consent function compares the self-decided error sign with the reference error sign and is based on the discovery that in certain areas of the symbol constellation plane, when the signs of the previous errors are equal, there is a high probability that the self-decided error signs and true error signs (unknown) will also be equal.
Inventors
- 👤 Giorgio Picchi
- 👤 Giancarlo Prati
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-25 17:45
CPC Classifications
H; H04; H04L; H04L25/00; H04L25/02; H04L25/03; H04L25/03006; H04L25/03012; H04L25/03019; H04L25/03057; H04L25/0307
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 45
Claim 1
Independent Claim
119 words
An adaptive blind equalization method for reception of electrical signals codified into symbols and transmitted on a transmission channel of unknown characteristics that are variable in time and introduce intersymbol interference comprising the steps of: delaying said symbols with a chain of delay elements; multiplying delayed symbols with adaptable parameters; adding delayed and multiplied symbols to obtain signal samples; assigning a decided symbol to each signal sample using a decision process; and adjusting said adaptable parameters to obtain minimum intersymbol interference, said adjusting step including the steps of: minimizing a cost function to determine an optimal configuration of said adaptable parameters. determining if a reliability criterion is met, and implementing said optimal configuration when said reliability criterion is met.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
119 words
An adaptive blind equalization method for reception of electrical signals codified into symbols and transmitted on a transmission channel of unknown characteristics that are variable in time and introduce intersymbol interference comprising the steps of: delaying said symbols with a chain of delay elements; multiplying delayed symbols with adaptable parameters; adding delayed and multiplied symbols to obtain signal samples; assigning a decided symbol to each signal sample using a decision process; and adjusting said adaptable parameters to obtain minimum intersymbol interference, said adjusting step including the steps of: minimizing a cost function to determine an optimal configuration of said adaptable parameters. determining if a reliability criterion is met, and implementing said optimal configuration when said reliability criterion is met.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
25 words
A method according to claim 1 wherein said cost function uses a mean square error that exists between said decided symbols and said signal samples.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
24 words
A method according to claim 1 wherein said cost function uses a peak distortion that exists between said decided symbols and said signal samples.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
27 words
A method according to claim 1 wherein said delaying step successively delays for a period equal to a signal transmission time to produce a synchronous signal equalization.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
31 words
A method according to claim 1 wherein said delaying step successively delays for a period smaller than a signal transmission time, thus producing an equalization of signals with fractionary spacing cells.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
22 words
A method according to claim 5 wherein said delaying step successively delays for a period equal to half said signal transmission time.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
19 words
A method according to claim 1 wherein said reliability criterion of said determining step is a binary consent function.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
24 words
A method according to claim 7 wherein said binary consent function compares a sign of decided error with a sign of a reference error.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
40 words
A method according to claim 8 wherein said decided error is a difference between said signal samples and said decided symbols and said reference error is a difference between said signal samples and a reference point of said decided symbols.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
19 words
A method according to claim 1 wherein said electrical signals are transmitted on two carriers at the same frequency.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
12 words
A method according to claim 10 wherein said carriers are in quadrature.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
14 words
A method according to claim 11 wherein said carriers in quadrature are amplitude modulated.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
19 words
A method according to claim 7 wherein said binary consent function has a real part and an imaginary part.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
35 words
A method according to claim 13 wherein said real part and imaginary part of said binary consent function independently provide for adaptation of the real part and the imaginary part, respectively, of the adaptable parameters.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
37 words
A method according to claim 14 wherein said real part and said imaginary part of said binary consent function must both consent for adaptation of the real part and the imaginary part, respectively, of the adaptable parameters.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
74 words
A method according to claim 13 wherein: said real part of the binary consent function is constructed by comparing a sign of the real part of a decided error with a sign of the real part of a reference error, and said imaginary part of the binary consent function is constructed by comparing a sign of the imaginary part of a decided error with a sign of the imaginary part of a reference error.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
120 words
A method according to claim 16 wherein: said sign of the real part of the decided error is a difference between the real part of said signal samples and the real part of said decided symbols, said sign of the imaginary part of the decided error is a difference between the imaginary part of said signal samples and the imaginary part of said decided symbols, the real part of the reference error is a difference between the real part of said signal samples and a reference point of the symbol constellation plane, and the imaginary part of the reference error is a difference between the imaginary part of said signal samples with said reference point of the symbol constellation plane.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
29 words
A method according to claim 1 further including the step of adjusting second adaptable parameters by feedback filtering to further minimize said cost function and obtain minimal intersymbol interference.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
40 words
A method according to claim 1 further including the steps of: automatically controlling a gain of said symbols before said delaying step; and recovering a carrier phase of said symbol after said gain control step and before said delaying step.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
137 words
An adaptive blind equalization apparatus for reception of electrical signals codified into symbols and transmitted on a transmission channel of unknown characteristics that are variable in time and introduce intersymbol interference comprising; first means for delaying said symbols with a chain of delay elements; first means for multiplying delayed symbols with adaptable parameters; first means for adding delayed and multiplied symbols to obtain signal samples; means for assigning a decided symbol to each signal sample using a decision process; and means for adjusting said adaptable parmeters to obtain minimum intersymbol interference, said adjusting means including: means for minimizing a cost function to determine an optimal configuration of said adaptable parameters, control means for determining if a reliability criterion is met, and means for implementing said optimal configuration of said adaptable parameters when said reliability criterion is met.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
137 words
An adaptive blind equalization apparatus for reception of electrical signals codified into symbols and transmitted on a transmission channel of unknown characteristics that are variable in time and introduce intersymbol interference comprising; first means for delaying said symbols with a chain of delay elements; first means for multiplying delayed symbols with adaptable parameters; first means for adding delayed and multiplied symbols to obtain signal samples; means for assigning a decided symbol to each signal sample using a decision process; and means for adjusting said adaptable parmeters to obtain minimum intersymbol interference, said adjusting means including: means for minimizing a cost function to determine an optimal configuration of said adaptable parameters, control means for determining if a reliability criterion is met, and means for implementing said optimal configuration of said adaptable parameters when said reliability criterion is met.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
30 words
An apparatus according to claim 20 wherein said reliability criterion of said control means is a binary consent signal that is input to a first multiplier in said control means.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
79 words
An apparatus according to claim 20 further including: feedback means for further minimizing said cost function, sad feedback means including: second means for delaying said decided symbols, second means for multiplying said delayed decided symbols with second adaptable parameters, second means for adding said delayed decided symbols, and third means for adding said delayed decided symbols and said delayed symbols; and wherein said adjusting means further includes means for adjusting said second adaptable parameters to obtain minimum intersymbol interference.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
57 words
An apparatus according to claim 22 wherein: said minimizing means minimizes said cost function to determine an optimal configuration of said first adaptable parameters, said control means determines if said reliability criterion is met, and said implementing means implements said optimal configuration of said second adaptable parameters when said reliability criterion is met using a second multiplier.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
50 words
An apparatus according to claim 20 further including: means for controlling gain of said symbols; means for recovering a carrier phase of said symbols; and wherein said implementing means enables or inhibits said gain controlling means and said carrier phase recovering means using a first multiplier and said reliability criterion.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
20 words
An apparatus according to claim 24 wherein said reliability criterion is a binary consent signal generated by a second multiplier.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
39 words
An apparatus according to claim 25 wherein said second multiplier receives at a first input a decided error signal coming from a first adder and at a second input a binary consent function coming from a first decision block.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
40 words
An apparatus according to claim 26 wherein said first decision block receives at its input the output signal of a third multiplier which in turn receives at its input the output signals of a first and second sign calculation block.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
25 words
An apparatus according to claim 27 wherein said first sign calculation block receives at its input a reference error signal generated by a second adder.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
30 words
An apparatus according to claim 28 wherein said second adder receives at its noninverting input said signal samples and at its inverting input the output signal of a fourth multiplier.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
31 words
An apparatus according to claim 29 wherein said fourth multiplier receives at its inputs a real quantity output of a third sign calculation block and the output of a block generator.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
19 words
An apparatus according to claim 30 wherein said third sign calculation block receives at its input said signal samples.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
26 words
An apparatus according to claim 26 wherein said first adder receives at an inverting input said decided symbols and at its noninverting input said signal samples.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
32 words
An apparatus according to claim 32 wherein said binary consent signal is made up of a real part generated by a third multiplier and an imaginary part generated by a fourth multiplier.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
83 words
An apparatus according to claim 33 wherein: said third multiplier receives at a first input a real part of a decided error from a second adder and at a second input a real part signal of said binary consent function from said first decision block, and said fourth multiplier receives at a first input an imaginary part of said decided error from said first adder and at a second input an imaginary part of said binary consent function from a second decision block.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
76 words
An apparatus according to claim 34 wherein: said first decision block receives at its input the output signal of a fifth multiplier, which, in turn, receives at its inputs the output signals of a first and a second sign calculation block, and said second decision block receives at its input the output signal of a sixth multiplier which in turn receives at its inputs the output signals of a third and a fourth sign calculation block.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
50 words
An apparatus according to claim 35 wherein: said first sign calculation block receives at its input a real part of a reference error generated by a third adder, and said fourth sign calculation block receives at its input an imaginary part of a reference error generated by a fourth adder.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim
62 words
An apparatus according to claim 36 wherein: said third adder receives at its noninverting input the real part of said signal samples and at its inverting input the output signal of a seventh multiplier, and said fourth adder receives at its noninverting input the imaginary part of said signal samples and at its inverting input the output signal of an eighth multiplier.
Claim 40
Dependent Claim
55 words
An apparatus according to claim 37 wherein: said seventh multiplier receives at its inputs the output of a fifth sign calculation block and a real quantity output of a block generator, and said eighth multiplier receives at its inputs the output of a sixth sign calculation block and said real quantity of said block generator.
Claim 41
Dependent Claim
40 words
An apparatus according to claim 38 wherein: said fifth sign calculation block receives at its input the real part of said signal samples, and said sixth sign calculation block receives at its input the imaginary part of said signal samples.
Claim 42
Dependent Claim
59 words
An apparatus according to claim 26 wherein said first adder receives at its inverting input a real part and an imaginary part of said decided symbols and at its noninverting input a real part and an imaginary part of said signal samples and generates at its output a decided error signal having a real part and an imaginary part.
Claim 43
Dependent Claim
21 words
An apparatus according to claim 21 wherein said first multiplier receives at one of its inputs an amplitude limited pilot vector.
Claim 44
Dependent Claim
38 words
An apparatus according to claim 21 wherein said first multiplier receives at one of its inputs a pilot vector and upstream from said first multiplier is inserted a first sign calculation block that extracts the pilot vector sign.
Claim 45
Dependent Claim
24 words
An apparatus according to claim 39 wherein upstream from said fourth multiplier is inserted seventh sign calculation block which extracts the decided error sign.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1992-07-10 | 1993-01-09 | 1993-07-11 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1996-07-10 | 1997-01-09 | 1997-07-11 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2000-07-10 | 2001-01-09 | 2001-07-11 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |