US4845975A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for monitoring a work vehicle suspension
Assignee: Caterpillar Inc
•
Filing: 1988-03-02
•
Granted: 1989-07-11
•
Expires: 2008-03-02
Abstract
Abstract Off-highway trucks generally rely on a suspension system which employs a plurality of gas-over-liquid type struts. These struts are critical to proper operation of the vehicle such that a single collapsed strut can have serious manifestations in structural damage, tire wear, and payload monitor accuracy. These consequences can be mitigated by an accurate and reliable strut monitor. Pressure type sensors are disposed on each of the struts and their pressure is monitored during three critical phases of operation. These phases include static, loading, and roading modes and each mode requires a distinct method for detecting a collapsing strut. The presence of a collapsing strut, detected by any of the three methods, is communicated to the vehicle operator whereby operation can be immediately suspended. The system avoids the serious consequences of vehicle operation with a collapsed strut by providing the operator with immediate and positive feedback on the condition of the struts.
Inventors
- 👤 Christos T. Kyrtsos
- 👤 F. Paul Lutgen
- 👤 Adam J. Gudat
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-31 02:10
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01M; G01M17/00; G01M17/007; G01M17/04; B; B60; B60C; B60C23/00; B60C23/001; B60C23/002; B60G; B60G17/00; B60G17/015; B60G17/018; B60G17/0185; B60G2300/00; B60G2300/02; B60G2300/026; B60G2300/07; B60G2400/00; B60G2400/20; B60G2400/204; B60G2400/50; B60G2400/51; B60G2400/52; B60G2400/60; B60G2600/00; B60G2600/02; B60G2600/04; B60G2600/08
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 6
Claim 1
Independent Claim
169 words
A method for detecting a collapsed strut of a work vehicle having a plurality of left and right strut mounted wheels, comprising: periodically sensing the internal pressure of selected struts; delivering a plurality of first signals each having a magnitude correlative to the internal pressure of each respective strut; storing a first set of the periodically delivered first signals having a first magnitude; storing a second set of the periodically delivered first signals in response to the first signals remaining substantially stable at a second magnitude for a preselected duration of time; computing the stiffness of at least two of the selected struts in response to the difference between the first and second magnitudes; comparing the stiffness of at least one of the selected struts to the stiffness of another of the selected struts and delivering second signals each having a magnitude correlative to the stiffness differential; delivering a signal indicative of a collapsed strut in response to the magnitude of the second signals being outside a preselected range.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
169 words
A method for detecting a collapsed strut of a work vehicle having a plurality of left and right strut mounted wheels, comprising: periodically sensing the internal pressure of selected struts; delivering a plurality of first signals each having a magnitude correlative to the internal pressure of each respective strut; storing a first set of the periodically delivered first signals having a first magnitude; storing a second set of the periodically delivered first signals in response to the first signals remaining substantially stable at a second magnitude for a preselected duration of time; computing the stiffness of at least two of the selected struts in response to the difference between the first and second magnitudes; comparing the stiffness of at least one of the selected struts to the stiffness of another of the selected struts and delivering second signals each having a magnitude correlative to the stiffness differential; delivering a signal indicative of a collapsed strut in response to the magnitude of the second signals being outside a preselected range.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
25 words
A method, as set forth in claim 1, wherein the step of comparing includes comparing the stiffness of only the left and right rear struts.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
39 words
A method, as set forth in claim 2, wherein the step of comparing includes calculating the ratio of the stiffness of the left and right rear struts and delivering the second signal responsive to the magnitude of the ratio.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
28 words
A method, as set forth in claim 3, wherein the step of delivering a signal indicative of a collapsed strut includes comparing the ratio to the preselected range.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
16 words
A method, as set forth in claim 4, wherein the preselected range is 0.7 to 1.3.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2638777A
Cited
SU141329A1
Cited
US3900828A
Cited
US4317105A
Cited
US4459579A
Cited
GB2093946A
Cited
US4458234A
Cited
US4426683A
Cited
US4574267A
Cited
US4550385A
Cited
US4468650A
Cited
US4635739A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1992-07-10 | 1993-01-09 | 1993-07-11 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1996-07-10 | 1997-01-09 | 1997-07-11 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2000-07-10 | 2001-01-09 | 2001-07-11 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |