← Back to Patent Explorer
US4842792A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Drafting process for preparing a modified polyester fiber

Assignee: Clemson University Research Foundation
•
Filing: 1988-02-16
•
Granted: 1989-06-27
•
Expires: 2008-02-16
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract Preparation of a novel polyester fiber, such as a poly(ethylene terephthalate) fiber, having at least one continuous groove wherein the surface of the groove is rougher than the surface outside the groove is accomplished through a drafting process involving surface hydrolysis. The fibers have improved cover, softness, and wetting characteristics.

Inventors

  • 👤 Shriram Bagrodia
  • 👤 Bobby M. Phillips

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-02 19:26
CPC Classifications
D; D01; D01D; D01D5/00; D01D5/253; D01F; D01F11/00; D01F11/04; D01F11/08; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S8/00; Y10S8/04

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 19
Claim 1
Independent Claim 100 words
A drafting process for preparing a modified polyester fiber comprising: hydrolyzing and drafting an unhydrolyzed polyester fiber having formed therein and extending along the length thereof at least one continuous groove. wherein the cross-section of said fiber has at least one groove such that 0.15 ≦W/H ≦8.0 where W is width of the groove and H is height of the groove; said hydrolyzing ocurring to the extent necessary to modify said polyester fiber such that the mean EB Roughness at the bottom of said groove is about 10% to about 600% higher than the mean EB Roughness outside said groove.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 100 words
A drafting process for preparing a modified polyester fiber comprising: hydrolyzing and drafting an unhydrolyzed polyester fiber having formed therein and extending along the length thereof at least one continuous groove. wherein the cross-section of said fiber has at least one groove such that 0.15 ≦W/H ≦8.0 where W is width of the groove and H is height of the groove; said hydrolyzing ocurring to the extent necessary to modify said polyester fiber such that the mean EB Roughness at the bottom of said groove is about 10% to about 600% higher than the mean EB Roughness outside said groove.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 111 words
A drafting process for preparing a modified polyester fiber comprising: (a) contacting an alkaline medium and an unhydrolyzed polyester fiber having formed therein and extending along the length thereof at least one continuous groove, wherein the cross-section of said fiber has at least one groove such that 0.15 ≦W/H ≦8.0 where W is width of the groove and H is height of the groove: and (b) heating and drafting the fiber treated by step (a) to the extent necessary to modify said polyester fiber such that the mean EB Roughness at the bottom of said groove is about 10% to about 600% higher than the mean EB Roughness outside said groove.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 111 words
A drafting process for preparing a modified polyester fiber comprising: (a) contacting an alkaline medium and an unhydrolyzed polyester fiber having formed therein and extending along the length thereof at least one continuous groove, wherein the cross-section of said fiber has at least one groove such that 0.15 ≦W/H ≦8.0 where W is width of the groove and H is height of the groove: and (b) heating and drafting the fiber treated by step (a) to the extent necessary to modify said polyester fiber such that the mean EB Roughness at the bottom of said groove is about 10% to about 600% higher than the mean EB Roughness outside said groove.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 12 words
The process of claim 1 wherein said polyester material is poly(ethylene terephthalate).
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 12 words
The process of claim 2 wherein said polyester material is poly(ethylene terephthalate).
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 17 words
The process of claim 2 wherein said alkaline solution is an aqueous solution of a metal hydroxide.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 12 words
The process of claim 3 wherein said metal hydroxide is sodium hydroxide.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 84 words
The process of claim 2 wherein the concentration of sodium hydroxide in the alkaline solution is between about 1 percent and about 10 percent by weight, the residence time of step (a) is between about 1 second and about 10 seconds, the temperature for step (a) is between about 60° and about 90° C., the residence time for step (b) is between about 1 second and about 60 seconds, and the temperature for step (b) is between about 130° C. and about 240° C.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 31 words
The process of claim 2 wherein the residence time of step (b) is between about 1 to 30 seconds at a temperature of between about 170° C. to about 230° C.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 17 words
The process of claim 2 wherein step (b) is carried out in the presence of superheated steam.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 13 words
The process of claim 1 wherein said fiber has 2 to 6 grooves.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 13 words
The process of claim 2 wherein said fiber has 2 to 6 grooves.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 19 words
The process of claim 2 including the additional steps of neutralizing, drying, lubricating, crimping and cutting the treated fiber.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 12 words
The process of claim 2 wherein said alkaline solution contains an accelerator.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 40 words
The process of claim 1 wherein the modified fiber has a mean EB Roughness at the bottom of said groove of about 0.08μ to about 0.37μ and a mean EB Roughness outside said groove of about 0.06μ to about 0.20μ.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 40 words
The process of claim 2 wherein the modified fiber has a mean EB Roughness at the bottom of said groove of about 0.08μ to about 0.37μ and a mean EB Roughness outside said groove of about 0.06μ to about 0.20μ.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 34 words
The proces of claim 1 wherein, after hydrolysis, the mean EB Roughness at the bottom of said groove is about 25 to about 500 percent higher than the mean EB Roughness outside said groove.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 35 words
The process of claim 2 wherein, after step (b), the mean EB Roughness at the bottom of said groove is about 25 to about 500 percent higher than the mean EB Roughness outside said groove.

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1992-06-26 1992-12-26 1993-06-27 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1996-06-26 1996-12-26 1997-06-27 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2000-06-26 2000-12-26 2001-06-27 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag