US4832480A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Differential diagnosis of sensory abnormalities using a normalized, ratiometric analysis of steady state evoked potentials
Assignee: Optek Inc
•
Filing: 1988-02-16
•
Granted: 1989-05-23
•
Expires: 2008-02-16
Abstract
Abstract A method for testing the visual system to detect the presence of disease, and to distinguish disease which has degraded the linear visual pathway from disease degrading the nonlinear visual pathway in a manner which is substantially independent of the stimulus applied to the eye and the connection of the instrumentation to the patient being tested. Three light sources having their amplitude varied at different frequencies stimulate the eye. The response evoked in the brain is detected and Fourier analyzed. The amplitude of selected Fourier components are detected and used to compute a ratio which removes the dependence upon the factors stated above. The Fourier component amplitude factors are selected so that the number of factors in the numerator of the ratio is equal to the number in the denominator and the sum of the orders of the factors in the numerator are equal to the sum of the orders in the denominator. This provides a ration of the response of the linear system to the response of a nonlinear system, which can be compared to a data bank of such test results to determine whether a particular patient being tested deviates enough from the normal response to suspect disease, and the direction and magnitude of that deviation so that the type and extent of disease can be indicated.
Inventors
- 👤 Karl Kornacker
- 👤 Marvin E. Monroe
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-24 02:01
CPC Classifications
A; A61; A61B; A61B5/00; A61B5/72; A61B5/7235; A61B5/7253; A61B5/7257; A61B5/24; A61B5/316; A61B5/369; A61B5/377
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 15
Claim 1
Independent Claim
183 words
A machine implemented method for testing a visual sensory system of a vertebrate to obtain measurements for use in determining whether a disease condition exists and for differentiating disease affecting the linear pathway of the sensory system from disease affecting the non-linear pathway of the sensory system, the method comprising: (a) applying a periodic visual stimulus to the eye of the vertebrate; (b) detecting the periodic electrical signal evoked by the stimulus in the brain of the vertebrate; (c) detecting the amplitude of selected Fourier components of the evoked signal, said components being selected to enable the performance of step (d) and to exclude any higher order components at frequencies which are present in said periodic visual stimulus, one of said components being a first order factor; (d) machine computing a ratio having a numerator and a denominator representing the ratio of the transfer functions of said linear and non-linear pathways, either the numerator or denominator including a first order amplitude factor selected and detected in step (c) and the other including a higher order amplitude factor selected and detected in step (c).
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
183 words
A machine implemented method for testing a visual sensory system of a vertebrate to obtain measurements for use in determining whether a disease condition exists and for differentiating disease affecting the linear pathway of the sensory system from disease affecting the non-linear pathway of the sensory system, the method comprising: (a) applying a periodic visual stimulus to the eye of the vertebrate; (b) detecting the periodic electrical signal evoked by the stimulus in the brain of the vertebrate; (c) detecting the amplitude of selected Fourier components of the evoked signal, said components being selected to enable the performance of step (d) and to exclude any higher order components at frequencies which are present in said periodic visual stimulus, one of said components being a first order factor; (d) machine computing a ratio having a numerator and a denominator representing the ratio of the transfer functions of said linear and non-linear pathways, either the numerator or denominator including a first order amplitude factor selected and detected in step (c) and the other including a higher order amplitude factor selected and detected in step (c).
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
85 words
A method in accordance with claim 2 wherein the numerator and the denominator are each a product of a multiplication of selected Fourier component amplitude factors, the number of factors in the numerator being equal to the number of factors in the denominator so that output gain factors will be cancelled and the sum of the orders of the factors in the numerator being equal to the sum of the orders of the factors in the denominator so that input gain factors will be cancelled.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
76 words
A method in accordance with claim 2 further comprising: (e) applying the method of claim 1 to a base of vertebrates of like species to detect and store a data base of said ratios; (f) selecting a range of values of said ratio about the average or mean of the ratios of the data base; and (g) machine computing the ratio from a test of a particular vertebrate signalling whether the ratio is within the range.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
22 words
A method in accordance with claim 3 and further comprising machine computing the amount by which the ratio falls outside said range.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
15 words
A method in accordance with claim 4 wherein the stimulus comprises a radiating light source.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
27 words
A method in accordance with claim 5 wherein said periodic visual stimulus comprises three light sources, each source having its light intensity varied at a different frequency.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
24 words
A method in accordance with claim 6 wherein the frequency of each source is less than the second harmonic of the lowest source frequency.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
30 words
A method in accordance with claim 7 wherein the source frequencies are selected so that the lowest source frequency is greater than twice the difference between the other two frequencies.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
15 words
A method in accordance with claim 8 wherein the frequencies are 8, 9 and 11Hz.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
29 words
A method in accordance with claim 7 wherein each selected Fourier amplitude factor is a coefficient of a Fourier term below the second harmonic of the lowest source frequency.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
77 words
A method in accordance with claim 1 or claim 2 wherein said periodic visual stimulus comprises three light sources, each source having its light intensity varied at a different frequency and wherein one of either said numerator or said denominator is the squared amplitude of a second order factor and the other of said numerator or said denominator is the product of the amplitude of a first order factor and the amplitude of a third order factor.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
26 words
A method in accordance with claim 1 or 2 or 3 wherein said periodic stimulus is a single linear light source driven by a sinusoidal signal.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
34 words
A method in accordance with claim 1 or 2 or 3 wherein said periodic stimulus is a single linear light source driven by a signal having Fourier components of at least three different frequencies.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
28 words
A method in accordance with claim 1 or 2 or 3 wherein said periodic stimulus is two light sources driven by square wave signals at two different frequencies.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4181407A
Cited
US4493327A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1992-05-22 | 1992-11-21 | 1993-05-23 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1996-05-22 | 1996-11-21 | 1997-05-23 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2000-05-22 | 2000-11-21 | 2001-05-23 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |