Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 11
Claim 1
Independent Claim
203 words
A holographic display system comprising: (a) a display source emitting light; (b) a first hologram receiving the light from the display source and diffracting the received light, wherein the light from the display source is applied to the first hologram at an incident angle A1 and moves from the first hologram at an outgoing angle B1; and (c) a second hologram receiving the light from the first hologram and diffractively reflecting the received light, wherein the light diffractively reflected by the second hologram forms an image of the display source in viewer's field of view, and wherein the light from the first hologram is applied to the second hologram at an incident angle A2 and moves from the second hologram at an outgoing angle B2; wherein the first and second holograms are nonparallel to remove a ghost image of the display source which would result from at least one of surface reflections at the first and second holograms, wherein the first hologram has an angle θ relative to the second hologram, and wherein the angles A1, B1, A2, B2, and θ are in a fixed relationship to remove chromatic aberration which would result fro the nonparallel arrangement of the first and second holograms.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
203 words
A holographic display system comprising: (a) a display source emitting light; (b) a first hologram receiving the light from the display source and diffracting the received light, wherein the light from the display source is applied to the first hologram at an incident angle A1 and moves from the first hologram at an outgoing angle B1; and (c) a second hologram receiving the light from the first hologram and diffractively reflecting the received light, wherein the light diffractively reflected by the second hologram forms an image of the display source in viewer's field of view, and wherein the light from the first hologram is applied to the second hologram at an incident angle A2 and moves from the second hologram at an outgoing angle B2; wherein the first and second holograms are nonparallel to remove a ghost image of the display source which would result from at least one of surface reflections at the first and second holograms, wherein the first hologram has an angle θ relative to the second hologram, and wherein the angles A1, B1, A2, B2, and θ are in a fixed relationship to remove chromatic aberration which would result fro the nonparallel arrangement of the first and second holograms.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
26 words
The holographic display system of claim 1 wherein the angle θ is in a range of +5° to +20° and a range of -5° to -20°.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
25 words
The holographic display system of claim 1 wherein the fixed relationship is expressed by an equation as follows: (cos (B1-θ)/cos B1)·((sin A1-sin B1)/(sin A2-sin B2))=-1.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
22 words
The holographic display system of claim 1 wherein the first and second holograms have surfaces provided with multilayer coats preventing surface reflection.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
51 words
The holographic display system of claim 1 wherein the first hologram diffractively reflects a first component of the display source light toward the second hologram and transmits a second component of the display source light, and the display source is allowed to be seen from the viewer through the first hologram.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
40 words
The holographic display system of claim 1 wherein the first and second holograms act on essentially only light having a wavelength in a predetermined range, and the light emitted from the display source has a wavelength in the predetermined range.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
25 words
The holographic display system of claim 6 wherein the first and second holograms have diffraction efficiencies which peak at essentially equal predetermined light wavelengths respectively.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
20 words
The holographic display system of claim 7 wherein the diffraction efficiency of the first hologram is essentially higher than 80%.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
24 words
The holographic display system of claim 7 wherein the diffraction efficiency of the second hologram is essentially in the range of 30 to 80%.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
37 words
The holographic display system of claim 7 wherein the diffraction efficiency of the first hologram is essentially higher than 80%, and the diffraction efficiency of the second hologram is essentially in the range of 30 to 80%.